Human Reproduction, Vol. 15, No. 10, 2173-2179,
October 2000
© 2000 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
Improvement in motion characteristics and acrosome status in cryopreserved human spermatozoa by swim-up processing before freezing*
1 Andrology Research & Clinical Laboratories, Department of Urology, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland OH 44195, USA and 2 Andrology & Human Reproduction Clinic (ANDROFERT), Rua Tiradentes, 289/61, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil 13023–190
The purpose of this study was to examine if selecting a sperm population with improved motion characteristics before freezing reduces the deleterious effects of cryopreservation. Semen specimens from 15 normal donors were divided into two equal aliquots. The first aliquot received no treatment (control), and the second was processed by swim-up from a washed sperm preparation to select a sperm population with better motility and motion characteristics (swim-up). Both aliquots were cryopreserved by the liquid nitrogen vapour method. Percentage motility and motion characteristics were evaluated by computer-assisted semen analysis. Acrosome integrity as well as spontaneous and calcium ionophore-induced acrosome reactions before freezing and after thawing were assessed by fluorescein isothiocyanate conjugated peanut agglutinin combined with a supra vital dye (Hoechst-33258). Swim-up processing enabled selection of a sperm population with better motion characteristics, percentage motility and viability before freezing (P < 0.001), but with no difference in percentage of acrosome-intact spermatozoa (P = 0.63). After thawing, the swim-up specimens exhibited faster velocity and progression than untreated specimens (P < 0.001). They also had higher percentages of spermatozoa with intact acrosomes and spermatozoa able to undergo acrosome reaction in response to calcium ionophore (P < 0.05). Selecting a highly motile sperm population before freezing enhances overall post-thaw spermatozoa quality.
Key words: acrosome/cryopreservation/human spermatozoa/sperm processing/swim-up
* Presented, in part, at the 93rd American Urological Association Annual Meeting (abstract # 785), San Diego, CA, USA.
3 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Andrology Research & Clinical Laboratories, Department of Urology, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, A19.1, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA. E-mail: agarwaa{at}ccf.org
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  E Isachenko, V Isachenko, J M Weiss, R Kreienberg, I I Katkov, M Schulz, A G-M I Lulat, M J Risopatron, and R Sanchez Acrosomal status and mitochondrial activity of human spermatozoa vitrified with sucrose Reproduction, August 1, 2008; 136(2): 167 - 173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. Oren-Benaroya, J. Kipnis, and M. Eisenbach Phagocytosis of human post-capacitated spermatozoa by macrophages Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2007; 22(11): 2947 - 2955. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Y.-H. Li, K.-J. Cai, A. Kovacs, and W.-Z. Ji Effects of Various Extenders and Permeating Cryoprotectants on Cryopreservation of Cynomolgus Monkey (Macaca fascicularis) Spermatozoa J Androl, May 1, 2005; 26(3): 387 - 395. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Isachenko, V. Isachenko, I.I. Katkov, G. Rahimi, T. Schondorf, P. Mallmann, S. Dessole, and F. Nawroth DNA integrity and motility of human spermatozoa after standard slow freezing versus cryoprotectant-free vitrification Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2004; 19(4): 932 - 939. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|