Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (19)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Raymond, E. G.
Right arrow Articles by Lessey, B. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Raymond, E. G.
Right arrow Articles by Lessey, B. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 15, No. 11, 2351-2355, November 2000
© 2000 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Effect of the Yuzpe regimen of emergency contraception on markers of endometrial receptivity

Elizabeth G. Raymond1,5, Laurie P. Lovely2, Mario Chen-Mok1, Markku Seppälä3, Robert J. Kurman4 and Bruce A. Lessey2

1 Family Health International, Research Triangle Park, NC, 2 Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA, 3 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland and 4 Departments of Gynecology and Obstetrics and of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA

This exploratory study was designed to determine whether treatment with the Yuzpe regimen of emergency contraception altered endometrial integrin expression or other markers of uterine receptivity. Nineteen parous women were followed for two menstrual cycles. In the second cycle, each participant took 100 mg ethinyl oestradiol and 1 mg norgestrel on the day of the urinary luteinizing hormone (LH) surge and repeated the dose 12 h later. In both cycles, endometrial biopsy, phlebotomy and vaginal sonogram were performed 8–10 days after the urinary LH surge. No significant difference was found between untreated and treated cycles in most measures of endometrial histology or in endometrial expression of ß3 integrin subunit, leukaemia inhibitory factor, glycodelin, or progesterone receptors assessed by immunohistochemical techniques. Five statistically significant changes were noted in treated cycles: a reduction in endometrial MUC-1 expression, an increase in endometrial oestrogen receptor, lower luteal phase serum oestrogen concentration, reduced endometrial thickness, and greater proportion of glandular supranuclear vacuoles. The relationship of these findings to the contraceptive action of the Yuzpe regimen is unclear.

Key words: emergency contraception/endometrial receptivity/integrins/leukaemia inhibitory factor/oestrogen receptors

5 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Family Health International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann Fam MedHome page
J. W. Campbell III, S. C. Busby, and T. E. Steyer
Attitudes and Beliefs About Emergency Contraception Among Patients at Academic Family Medicine Clinics
Ann. Fam. Med, January 1, 2008; 6(suppl_1): S23 - S27.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
D. A. Grimes and E. G. Raymond
Emergency Contraception
Ann Intern Med, August 6, 2002; 137(3): 180 - 189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
M. Seppala, R. N. Taylor, H. Koistinen, R. Koistinen, and E. Milgrom
Glycodelin: A Major Lipocalin Protein of the Reproductive Axis with Diverse Actions in Cell Recognition and Differentiation
Endocr. Rev., August 1, 2002; 23(4): 401 - 430.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.