Human Reproduction, Vol. 15, No. 11, 2379-2382,
November 2000
© 2000 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
Transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy compared with laparoscopy for the evaluation of infertile women: a prospective comparative blind study
1 Service de Gynécologie, Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu de Paris and 2 Service de Gynécologie Hôpital Boucicaut, Paris, France
Standard diagnostic laparoscopy is considered the gold standard to investigate tubo-peritoneal infertility. It requires general anaesthesia and full operative facilities. Due to the risk of complications, laparoscopy is frequently postponed to the final stage of infertility evaluation or even after treatment trials have failed. Transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy (THL) is based on vaginal access using a needle puncture technique and saline for distention. THL can be performed on an outpatient basis under local anaesthesia. However, little data exist concerning the accuracy of THL in comparison with laparoscopy. We conducted a prospective comparative blind trial to assess the feasibility and accuracy of THL compared with diagnostic laparoscopy in infertile women. Sixty women were assigned to undergo THL immediately prior to laparoscopy. Different operators evaluated the findings of the two procedures. In order to evaluate the accuracy of THL, findings in terms of tubal pathology, endometriosis and adhesions were analysed. The success rate of accessing the pouch of Douglas was 90.2%. Complication rate was 1.6%. THL diagnosis was correlated with that of laparoscopy in 92.3% of cases. In cases of abnormal findings by THL, there were no normal laparoscopies. Our pilot study suggests that THL is a safe and reproducible method. Retroverted uterus should be considered as a relative contraindication to THL. When a complete evaluation by THL is available, it is a highly accurate technique in comparison with the laparoscopy.
Key words: adhesions/endometriosis/hydrolaparoscopy/infertility/laparoscopy
3 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Service de Gynécologie, Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu de Paris, 2 rue d'arcole,75004 Paris, France. E-mail: emile.darai{at}htd.ap-hop-paris.fr
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  R. Campo and C. R. Molinas Modern endoscopic-based exploration of the female reproductive tract: a model for developing countries? ESHRE Monogr, July 1, 2008; 2008(1): 54 - 59. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E.A.A. van Tetering, M.Y. Bongers, M.A.H.M. Wiegerinck, B.W.J. Mol, and C.A.M. Koks Prognostic capacity of transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy to predict spontaneous pregnancy Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2007; 22(4): 1091 - 1094. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. L. Kataoka, K. Togashi, T. Yamaoka, T. Koyama, H. Ueda, H. Kobayashi, M. Rahman, T. Higuchi, and S. Fujii Posterior Cul-de-Sac Obliteration Associated with Endometriosis: MR Imaging Evaluation Radiology, March 1, 2005; 234(3): 815 - 823. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Watrelot, M. Nisolle, H. Chelli, C. Hocke, C. Rongieres, and C. Racinet Is laparoscopy still the gold standard in infertility assessment? A comparison of fertiloscopy versus laparoscopy in infertility: Results of an international multicentre prospective trial: The 'FLY' (Fertiloscopy-LaparoscopY) study Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2003; 18(4): 834 - 839. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Gordts, R. Campo, P. Puttemans, H. Verhoeven, L. Gianaroli, J. Brosens, and I. Brosens Investigation of the infertile couple : A one-stop outpatient endoscopy-based approach Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2002; 17(7): 1684 - 1687. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Shibahara, H. Fujiwara, Y. Hirano, T. Suzuki, H. Obara, S. Takamizawa, S. Idei, and I. Sato Usefulness of transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy in investigating infertile women with Chlamydia trachomatis infection Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2001; 16(8): 1690 - 1693. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|