Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (71)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alikani, M.
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Alikani, M.
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 15, No. 12, 2634-2643, December 2000
© 2000 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Cleavage anomalies in early human embryos and survival after prolonged culture in-vitro

Mina Alikani1, Gloria Calderon, Giles Tomkin, John Garrisi, Magdalena Kokot and Jacques Cohen

Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Science of Saint Barnabas Medical Center, West Orange, New Jersey, USA

This study examines the relationship between common morphological anomalies of cleaving embryos and their ability to form apparently normal blastocysts in vitro. The impact of cleavage rate, fragmentation, and multinucleation on compaction, cavitation, along with inner cell mass and trophectoderm formation has been assessed. The study population consisted of 102 patients who elected or were selected to have a day 5 embryo transfer. Clinical pregnancy and implantation rates were 66.7 and 49% respectively. Slow and fast cleavage had a significant negative association with normal blastocyst formation. Only 13.8% (67/484) of embryos with <7 cells and 27.5% (25/91) of those with >9 cells on day 3 formed blastocysts with apparently normal morphology, compared to 41.9% (252/602) with 7–9 cells on day 3 (P < 0.001). Fragmentation had a negative impact on normal blastocyst formation. Embryos with >15% fragmentation formed normal blastocysts at a significantly lower rate (46/279; 16.5%) than embryos with 0–15% fragmentation (311/935; 33.3%) (P < 0.001). Furthermore, the pattern of fragmentation was associated with blastocyst formation. Type IV fragmentation led to a significant reduction in blastocyst formation (25/170 or 14.7%), compared to types I, II and III which performed much better (38.6, 32.9 and 32.4% respectively). Only 15.9% (22/138) of embryos with one or more multinucleate cells on day 2 and/or 3 formed normal blastocysts compared with 31.9% (335/1051) (P < 0.001) of those without multinucleation. Collectively, the data suggest that cleavage anomalies, some of which do not preclude development after short-term culture, may reduce the developmental competence of embryos after prolonged culture.

Key words: blastocyst/cleavage rate/fragmentation degree/fragmentation pattern/multinucleation

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Science of Saint Barnabas Medical Center, 101 Old Short Hills Road, Suite 501, West Orange,NJ 07052, USAE-mail: mina.alikani{at}embryos.net


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
Z. Han, N. R. Mtango, B. G. Patel, C. Sapienza, and K. E. Latham
Hybrid Vigor and Transgenerational Epigenetic Effects on Early Mouse Embryo Phenotype
Biol Reprod, October 1, 2008; 79(4): 638 - 648.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Ziebe, K. Lundin, R. Janssens, L. Helmgaard, J.-C. Arce, and for the MERIT (Menotrophin vs Recombinant FSH in v
Influence of ovarian stimulation with HP-hMG or recombinant FSH on embryo quality parameters in patients undergoing IVF
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2007; 22(9): 2404 - 2413.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
F. Guerif, A. Le Gouge, B. Giraudeau, J. Poindron, R. Bidault, O. Gasnier, and D. Royere
Limited value of morphological assessment at days 1 and 2 to predict blastocyst development potential: A prospective study based on 4042 embryos
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2007; 22(7): 1973 - 1981.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S.R. Soares, C. Simon, J. Remohi, and A. Pellicer
Cigarette smoking affects uterine receptiveness
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2007; 22(2): 543 - 547.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M.A.B. Melo, M. Meseguer, N. Garrido, E. Bosch, A. Pellicer, and J. Remohi
The significance of premature luteinization in an oocyte-donation programme
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2006; 21(6): 1503 - 1507.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E. Van den Abbeel, M. Camus, G. Verheyen, L. Van Waesberghe, P. Devroey, and A. Van Steirteghem
Slow controlled-rate freezing of sequentially cultured human blastocysts: an evaluation of two freezing strategies
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2005; 20(10): 2939 - 2945.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
H. Chen, K. Qian, J. Hu, D. Liu, W. Lu, Y. Yang, D. Wang, H. Yan, S. Zhang, and G. Zhu
The derivation of two additional human embryonic stem cell lines from day 3 embryos with low morphological scores
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2005; 20(8): 2201 - 2206.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. R. Soares, C. Troncoso, E. Bosch, V. Serra, C. Simon, J. Remohi, and A. Pellicer
Age and Uterine Receptiveness: Predicting the Outcome of Oocyte Donation Cycles
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2005; 90(7): 4399 - 4404.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
M. Alikani, T. Schimmel, and S. M. Willadsen
Cytoplasmic fragmentation in activated eggs occurs in the cytokinetic phase of the cell cycle, in lieu of normal cytokinesis, and in response to cytoskeletal disorder
Mol. Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2005; 11(5): 335 - 344.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
B. Mateusen, A. Van Soom, D. G D Maes, I. Donnay, L. Duchateau, and A.-S. Lequarre
Porcine embryo development and fragmentation and their relation to apoptotic markers: a cinematographic and confocal laser scanning microscopic study
Reproduction, April 1, 2005; 129(4): 443 - 452.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E.M. Kolibianakis, K. Zikopoulos, W. Verpoest, M. Camus, H. Joris, A.C. Van Steirteghem, and P. Devroey
Should we advise patients undergoing IVF to start a cycle leading to a day 3 or a day 5 transfer?
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2004; 19(11): 2550 - 2554.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M.-L. Windt, T.F. Kruger, K. Coetzee, and C.J. Lombard
Comparative analysis of pregnancy rates after the transfer of early dividing embryos versus slower dividing embryos
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2004; 19(5): 1155 - 1162.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
F. J. Los, D. Van Opstal, and C. van den Berg
The development of cytogenetically normal, abnormal and mosaic embryos: a theoretical model
Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2004; 10(1): 79 - 94.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
P. Gamiz, C. Rubio, M. J. d. l. Santos, A. Mercader, C. Simon, J. Remohi, and A. Pellicer
The effect of pronuclear morphology on early development and chromosomal abnormalities in cleavage-stage embryos
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2003; 18(11): 2413 - 2419.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Alikani, N. A. Cekleniak, E. Walters, and J. Cohen
Monozygotic twinning following assisted conception: an analysis of 81 consecutive cases
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2003; 18(9): 1937 - 1943.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
P. Vanderzwalmen, G. Bertin, Ch. Debauche, V. Standaert, N. Bollen, E.v. Roosendaal, M. Vandervorst, R. Schoysman, and N. Zech
Vitrification of human blastocysts with the Hemi-Straw carrier: application of assisted hatching after thawing
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2003; 18(7): 1504 - 1511.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E. V. Royen, K. Mangelschots, M. Vercruyssen, D. D. Neubourg, M. Valkenburg, G. Ryckaert, and J. Gerris
Multinucleation in cleavage stage embryos
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2003; 18(5): 1062 - 1069.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
K. Hardy, J. Stark, and R. M.L. Winston
Maintenance of the Inner Cell Mass in Human Blastocysts from Fragmented Embryos
Biol Reprod, April 1, 2003; 68(4): 1165 - 1169.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
G. De Placido, M. Wilding, I. Strina, E. Alviggi, C. Alviggi, A. Mollo, M. T. Varicchio, A. Tolino, C. Schiattarella, and B. Dale
High outcome predictability after IVF using a combined score for zygote and embryo morphology and growth rate
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2002; 17(9): 2402 - 2409.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
B. Balaban, B. Urman, A. Isiklar, C. Alatas, S. Aksoy, R. Mercan, A. Mumcu, and A. Nuhoglu
The effect of pronuclear morphology on embryo quality parameters and blastocyst transfer outcome
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2001; 16(11): 2357 - 2361.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Sandalinas, S. Sadowy, M. Alikani, G. Calderon, J. Cohen, and S. Munne
Developmental ability of chromosomally abnormal human embryos to develop to the blastocyst stage
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2001; 16(9): 1954 - 1958.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. D. Fisch, H. Rodriguez, R. Ross, G. Overby, and G. Sher
The Graduated Embryo Score (GES) predicts blastocyst formation and pregnancy rate from cleavage-stage embryos
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2001; 16(9): 1970 - 1975.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.