Human Reproduction, Vol. 15, No. 5, 1112-1116,
May 2000
© 2000 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
The use of two density gradient centrifugation techniques and the swim-up method to separate spermatozoa with chromatin and nuclear DNA anomalies
1 Assisted Conception Unit, Birmingham Women's Hospital, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TG, UK, 2 Department of Animal Biology, University of Modena, Italy and 3 Clinic of Sterility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital of Geneva, Switzerland
Human semen is heterogeneous in quality, not only between males but also within a single ejaculate. Differences in quality are evident, both when examining the classical parameters of sperm number, motility and morphology and in the integrity of the sperm nucleus. The aim of this study was to determine the efficiency of the PureSperm®, Percoll® and swim-up preparation techniques to eliminate spermatozoa with nuclear anomalies. Semen samples were collected, washed and one part of the semen spread on a slide, the remainder was prepared using the swim-up, PureSperm® or Percoll® techniques. Spermatozoa from different fractions were fixed on slides and assessed. Sperm samples (n) from different men were stained using the chromomycin A3 (CMA3) fluorochrome, which indirectly demonstrates a decreased presence of protamine (n = 31 for swim-up; n = 45 for PureSperm®; n = 39 for Percoll®). Spermatozoa prepared using PureSperm® (n = 35) and Percoll® (n = 37) were also examined for the presence of endogenous DNA nicks. Good quality spermatozoa should not possess DNA nicks and not stain (i.e. fluoresce) with CMA3. When prepared using the swim-up technique the spermatozoa recovered showed no significant improvement with the CMA3 staining. When spermatozoa were prepared using the PureSperm® and Percoll® techniques, a significant (P < 0.001) decrease in both CMA3 positivity and DNA strand breakage was observed. These results indicate that both the PureSperm® and Percoll® techniques can enrich the sperm population by separating out those with nicked DNA and with poorly condensed chromatin.
Key words: Percoll®/PureSperm®/sperm chromatin/sperm nuclear DNA/sperm preparation
4 To whom correspondence should be addressed
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. Kheirollahi-Kouhestani, S. Razavi, M. Tavalaee, M.R. Deemeh, M. Mardani, J. Moshtaghian, and M.H. Nasr-Esfahani Selection of sperm based on combined density gradient and Zeta method may improve ICSI outcome Hum. Reprod., June 24, 2009; (2009) dep088v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Bungum, M. Spano, P. Humaidan, P. Eleuteri, M. Rescia, and A. Giwercman Sperm chromatin structure assay parameters measured after density gradient centrifugation are not predictive for the outcome of ART Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2008; 23(1): 4 - 10. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D.Y. Liu and H.W.G. Baker Human sperm bound to the zona pellucida have normal nuclear chromatin as assessed by acridine orange fluorescence Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2007; 22(6): 1597 - 1602. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 V. W. Aoki, B. R. Emery, L. Liu, and D. T. Carrell Protamine Levels Vary Between Individual Sperm Cells of Infertile Human Males and Correlate With Viability and DNA Integrity J Androl, November 1, 2006; 27(6): 890 - 898. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Borini, N. Tarozzi, D. Bizzaro, M.A. Bonu, L. Fava, C. Flamigni, and G. Coticchio Sperm DNA fragmentation: paternal effect on early post-implantation embryo development in ART Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2006; 21(11): 2876 - 2881. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. Oliva Protamines and male infertility Hum. Reprod. Update, July 1, 2006; 12(4): 417 - 435. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. R. Chohan, J. T. Griffin, M. Lafromboise, C. J. De Jonge, and D. T. Carrell Comparison of Chromatin Assays for DNA Fragmentation Evaluation in Human Sperm J Androl, January 1, 2006; 27(1): 53 - 59. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Seli and D. Sakkas Spermatozoal nuclear determinants of reproductive outcome: implications for ART Hum. Reprod. Update, July 1, 2005; 11(4): 337 - 349. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Oliveira-Ribeiro, C. A. Petta, L. A.L. De Angelo Andrade, L. Bahamondes, and M. M. Hidalgo Correlation between endometrial histology, microvascular density and calibre, matrix metalloproteinase-3 and bleeding pattern in women using a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2004; 19(8): 1778 - 1784. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Gandini, F. Lombardo, D. Paoli, F. Caruso, P. Eleuteri, G. Leter, R. Ciriminna, F. Culasso, F. Dondero, A. Lenzi, et al. Full-term pregnancies achieved with ICSI despite high levels of sperm chromatin damage Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2004; 19(6): 1409 - 1417. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Isachenko, V. Isachenko, I.I. Katkov, G. Rahimi, T. Schondorf, P. Mallmann, S. Dessole, and F. Nawroth DNA integrity and motility of human spermatozoa after standard slow freezing versus cryoprotectant-free vitrification Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2004; 19(4): 932 - 939. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Lachaud, J. Tesarik, M. L. Canadas, and C. Mendoza Apoptosis and necrosis in human ejaculated spermatozoa Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2004; 19(3): 607 - 610. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. G. Alvarez Nurture vs Nature: How Can We Optimize Sperm Quality? J Androl, September 1, 2003; 24(5): 640 - 648. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M.J. Tomlinson, O. Moffatt, G.C. Manicardi, D. Bizzaro, M. Afnan, and D. Sakkas Interrelationships between seminal parameters and sperm nuclear DNA damage before and after density gradient centrifugation: implications for assisted conception Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2001; 16(10): 2160 - 2165. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|