Human Reproduction, Vol. 15, No. 7, 1427-1430,
July 2000
© 2000 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
Debate continued |
Hydrosalpinx and ART
Hydrosalpinx functional surgery or salpingectomy?
1 Leuven Institute for Fertility and Embryology, Tiensevest 168, B-3000 Leuven, 2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St Elisabeth Hospital, Avenue De Fré 206, B-1180 Brussels, and 3 Unit for Reproductive Medicine, H.Hart Hospital, Naamsestraat 205, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
Abstract
The debate on the effect of the hydrosalpinx on medically-assisted reproduction has demonstrated the importance of understanding the complex pathophysiology of the hydrosalpinx in outlining the principles of its clinical management, whether it is by functional surgery or IVF, preceded or not by salpingectomy. New endoscopic techniques are available to accurately assess, both in the operating room and the office, the quality of the tubal mucosa. The direct endoscopic evaluation of the tubal mucosa in hydrosalpinges is at present the most reliable technique to select between functional surgery and preventive salpingectomy. In future, prospective randomized studies on salpingectomy will benefit greatly from accurate clinicopathological data.
Key words: hydrosalpinx/mucosal adhesions/salpingectomy/tubal surgery/tubal mucosa
Notes
4 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Leuven Institute for Fertility and Embryology, Tiensevest 168, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium. E-mail: ivo.brosens{at}med.kuleuven.ac.be
This debate was previously published on Webtrack, May 3, 2000
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Siassakos, A. Syed, and P. Wardle Tubal disease and assisted reproduction Obstet Gynaecol (Lond), April 1, 2008; 10(2): 80 - 87. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Strandell, A. Lindhard, U. Waldenstrom, and J. Thorburn Hydrosalpinx and IVF outcome: cumulative results after salpingectomy in a randomized controlled trial Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2001; 16(11): 2403 - 2410. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Bildirici, O. Bukulmez, A. Ensari, H. Yarali, and T. Gurgan A prospective evaluation of the effect of salpingectomy on endometrial receptivity in cases of women with communicating hydrosalpinges Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2001; 16(11): 2422 - 2426. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. H. Salha, V. K. Lamb, and A. H. Balen A postal survey of embryo transfer practice in the UK Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2001; 16(4): 686 - 690. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Dechaud Hydrosalpinx and ART: Hydrosalpinges suitable for salpingectomy before IVF Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2000; 15(12): 2464 - 2465. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Strandell and A. Lindhard Hydrosalpinx and ART: Salpingectomy prior to IVF can be recommended to a well-defined subgroup of patients Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2000; 15(10): 2072 - 2074. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

