Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stoddart, N.R.
Right arrow Articles by Fleming, S.D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stoddart, N.R.
Right arrow Articles by Fleming, S.D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 15, No. 7, 1580-1585, July 2000
© 2000 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Orientation of the first polar body of the oocyte at 6 or 12 o'clock during ICSI does not affect clinical outcome

N.R. Stoddart1,3 and S.D. Fleming2

1 Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University Hospital, Nottingham, UK and 2 Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Sydney, Westmead Hospital, NSW 2145, Australia

This study was designed to clarify whether orientation of the first polar body (PB) of the oocyte at 6 o'clock rather than 12 o'clock, during intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), significantly affects a number of clinically important outcome measures including fertilization, zygote cleavage, embryonic morphology, and clinical pregnancy and implantation rates. In all, 114 patients were allocated to one of two groups on the basis of strict alternation, both groups being treated by the same ICSI practitioner. In one group, all oocytes were injected with their first PB at 6 o'clock, whereas in the other, the orientation of the PB was reversed (12 o'clock). In all cases, a normally bevelled injection pipette was inserted into the oocyte in the 3 towards 9 o'clock direction. The orientation of the PB did not significantly affect the proportion of oocytes that failed to survive injection or the proportion scored as having either zero, one, two or three pronuclei. The proportion of normally fertilized zygotes that cleaved was not significantly different between the two groups, nor was the proportion of embryos classified as either grade 1, 2 or 3. However, the proportion of grade 4 embryos (the poorest grade) was significantly lower in the 12 o'clock, compared to the 6 o'clock group. Most importantly, there was no significant difference between the two groups in the proportion of patients having a positive clinical pregnancy test, nor in either the implantation rate or the mean number of fetal hearts detected per patient presenting with a clinical pregnancy.

Key words: embryo morphology/fertilization/ICSI/polar body/pregnancy

3 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Toll Center for Reproductive Sciences, Abington Memorial Hospital, Abington,PA 19001, USA. E-mail: neilandfaz{at}aol.com


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Cooke, J.P.P. Tyler, and G.L. Driscoll
Meiotic spindle location and identification and its effect on embryonic cleavage plane and early development
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2003; 18(11): 2397 - 2405.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. J. Quintans, M. J. Donaldson, M. V. Bertolino, and R. S. Pasqualini
Birth of two babies using oocytes that were cryopreserved in a choline-based freezing medium
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2002; 17(12): 3149 - 3152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.