Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Check, J.H.
Right arrow Articles by Nazari, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Check, J.H.
Right arrow Articles by Nazari, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 15, No. 8, 1679-1684, August 2000
© 2000 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

No evidence of increased uterine vascular impedance with patient ageing following IVF

J.H. Check1, C. Dietterich, D. Lurie and A. Nazari

The University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School at Camden, Cooper Hospital/University Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Camden, New Jersey, USA

A study was conducted to determine if uterine vascular impedance increases with advancing age in women undergoing ovarian stimulation for IVF. A group of 162 women who had undergone conventional IVF and embryo transfer was subdivided into three subgroups by age: 30–34 years (n = 49), 35–39 years (n = 79) and 40–44 years (n = 34). The pulsatility index (PI) and resistance index (RI) of the right and left uterine arteries were measured at baseline, on the day of oocyte retrieval, and at the mid-luteal phase. There were no differences in the average PI or RI by age at any phase of the cycle. In all age groups, the luteal phase values of PI and RI were lower than those observed earlier in the cycle. Endometrial thickness was not associated with age. There was no significant correlation between PI, RI and serum oestradiol and progesterone concentrations at any phase of the cycle. Ovarian response, as measured by average number of oocytes retrieved, decreased significantly with age. Thus, reduced pregnancy rates in older women undergoing ovarian stimulation are more likely to occur because of oocyte quality and quantity rather than uterine senescence. If future studies determine that the use of ovarian stimulation does decrease implantation rates more in older versus younger women, a mechanism other than increased uterine vascular impedance must be sought.

Key words: Doppler imaging/endometrial receptivity/uterine blood flow/uterine senescence

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: 7447 Old York Road, Melrose Park, PA 19027, USA. E-mail: laurie{at}ccivf.com


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E. H. Y. Ng, C. C. W. Chan, O. S. Tang, W. S. B. Yeung, and P. C. Ho
Factors affecting endometrial and subendometrial blood flow measured by three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound during IVF treatment
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2006; 21(4): 1062 - 1069.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E. J. de Boer, I. den Tonkelaar, E. R. te Velde, C. W. Burger, F. E. van Leeuwen, and on behalf of the OMEGA-project group*
Increased risk of early menopausal transition and natural menopause after poor response at first IVF treatment
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2003; 18(7): 1544 - 1552.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.