Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hung Yu Ng, E.
Right arrow Articles by Chung Ho, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hung Yu Ng, E.
Right arrow Articles by Chung Ho, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 15, No. 9, 1903-1908, September 2000
© 2000 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

A rapid decline in serum oestradiol concentrations around the mid-luteal phase had no adverse effect on outcome in 763 assisted reproduction cycles

Ernest Hung Yu Ng1, William Shu Biu Yeung, Estella Yee Lan Lau, William Wai Ki So and Pak Chung Ho

Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China

Progesterone is essential in the luteal phase whereas luteal oestradiol may play only a permissive role on the endometrium. However, a rapid decline in oestradiol concentrations around the mid-luteal period may compromise the endometrial integrity leading to poor IVF outcomes. A retrospective analysis of 763 women aged <40 years undergoing their first IVF cycle and having <=3 embryos replaced was undertaken. In cycles receiving human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) for luteal support, 25th, 50th and 75th centiles of the ratio of day-of-HCG oestradiol to mid-luteal oestradiol (oestradiol ratio) were 1.8, 2.8 and 5.0 respectively. Hormonal parameters were not different between pregnant and non-pregnant cycles. The outcomes were similar irrespective of the oestradiol ratio. Progesterone supplementation was used instead when the HCG oestradiol was >18 000 pmol/l or there were features of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Pregnancy rates of these hyperstimulated cycles were 16.7 and 11.4% per cycle respectively when oestradiol ratio was <=5.0 and >5.0. This difference did not reach statistical significance. Our results could not find an adverse outcome in cycles showing a rapid decline in oestradiol during the mid-luteal phase.

Key words: implantation rate/IVF/luteal phase/oestradiol/pregnancy rate

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 6/F, Professorial Block, Queen Mary Hospital, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong. E-mail: nghye{at}hkucc.hku.hk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
G. Makkar, E. H. Y. Ng, W. S. B. Yeung, and P. C. Ho
Reduced Expression of Interleukin-11 and Interleukin-6 in the Periimplantation Endometrium of Excessive Ovarian Responders during in Vitro Fertilization Treatment
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2006; 91(8): 3181 - 3188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C. C. W. Chan, E. H. Y. Ng, O. S. Tang, W. S. B. Yeung, E. Y. L. Lau, and P. C. Ho
A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study to Compare Two Doses of Recombinant Human Chorionic Gonadotropin in Inducing Final Oocyte Maturity and the Hormonal Profile during the Luteal Phase
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2005; 90(7): 3933 - 3938.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E. H. Y. Ng, C. C. W. Chan, O. S. Tang, W. S. B. Yeung, and P. C. Ho
Endometrial and subendometrial blood flow measured during early luteal phase by three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound in excessive ovarian responders
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2004; 19(4): 924 - 931.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
F. I. Sharara and E. Hung Yu Ng
Value of mid-luteal oestradiol level: prognostic implications for IVF
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2001; 16(11): 2476 - 2476.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E. H. Y. Ng
Value of mid-luteal oestradiol level: prognostic implications for IVF
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2001; 16(11): 2476 - 2476.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.