Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (69)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kahraman, S.
Right arrow Articles by Dönmez, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kahraman, S.
Right arrow Articles by Dönmez, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 15, No. 9, 2003-2007, September 2000
© 2000 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Healthy births and ongoing pregnancies obtained by preimplantation genetic diagnosis in patients with advanced maternal age and recurrent implantation failure

S. Kahraman1,4, M. Bahçe2, H. Samli3, N. Imirzalioglu2, K. Yakisn1, G. Cengiz1 and E. Dönmez1

1 Sevgi Hospital, Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Reproductive Endocrinology Unit, 2 G.A.T.A., Genetic Division and 3 Sevgi Hospital, Genetic Division, Ankara, Turkey

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) and subsequent embryo development was evaluated in 72 couples presenting at our centre for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) due to severe male factor. The embryo biopsies were performed in Ca2+/Mg2+-free medium. These patients were further divided into those with advanced maternal age (AMA, n = 49) and those with recurrent implantation failure (RIF, n = 23). Fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) was carried out on 329 blastomeres (91.3%) with probes for the X, Y, 13, 18 and 21 chromosomes. The chromosomal abnormality rate was 41.3% with no significant difference between the AMA and RIF groups. Aneuploidy accounted for the majority (72.8%) of chromosomal abnormalities. Out of 329 embryos, 84.2% had cleaved after 24 h and 15.1% had arrested. Embryos were transferred in 70 patients and 22 pregnancies were achieved (31.4% with an ongoing pregnancy rate of 28.5%). There were no significant differences between the pregnancy rates of the AMA and RIF groups (32.5 and 30% respectively). Therefore PGD should be offered to patients with AMA and RIF. Furthermore, the use of Ca2+/Mg2+-free medium during the blastomere biopsy facilitates the procedure, while further embryo cleavage, ongoing pregnancies and healthy births are possible.

Key words: aneuploidy/Ca2+/Mg2+-free medium/chromosomes X, Y, 13, 18, 21/FISH/preimplantation genetic diagnosis

4 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Istanbul Memorial Hospital, Reproductive Endocrinology and ART Unit, Piyalepasa Bulvar1, 80270, Okmeydan1 – Sisli Istanbul, Turkey.E-mail: semrakahraman{at}hotmail.com


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C.E. Beyer, T. Osianlis, K. Boekel, E. Osborne, L. Rombauts, J. Catt, V. Kralevski, B.S. Aali, and L. Gras
Preimplantation genetic screening outcomes are associated with culture conditions
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2009; 24(5): 1212 - 1220.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
T. Hardarson, C. Hanson, K. Lundin, T. Hillensjo, L. Nilsson, J. Stevic, E. Reismer, K. Borg, M. Wikland, and C. Bergh
Preimplantation genetic screening in women of advanced maternal age caused a decrease in clinical pregnancy rate: a randomized controlled trial
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2008; 23(12): 2806 - 2812.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. Staessen, W. Verpoest, P. Donoso, P. Haentjens, J. Van der Elst, I. Liebaers, and P. Devroey
Preimplantation genetic screening does not improve delivery rate in women under the age of 36 following single-embryo transfer
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2008; 23(12): 2818 - 2825.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
K. Yakin and B. Urman
What next for preimplantation genetic screening? A clinician's perspective
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2008; 23(8): 1686 - 1690.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
W. M. Ankum, J. B. Reitsma, and M. Offringa
Reply: Ethical recruitment of patients for PGS trial
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2008; 23(6): 1472 - 1473.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
P. Donoso, C. Staessen, B.C.J.M. Fauser, and P. Devroey
Current value of preimplantation genetic aneuploidy screening in IVF
Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2007; 13(1): 15 - 25.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
N. Frydman, S. Madoux, L. Hesters, C. Duvernoy, E. Feyereisen, A. Le Du, G. Tachdjian, R. Frydman, and R. Fanchin
A randomized double-blind controlled study on the efficacy of laser zona pellucida thinning on live birth rates in cases of advanced female age
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2006; 21(8): 2131 - 2135.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
A. Pujol, J. Benet, C. Staessen, E. Van Assche, M. Campillo, J. Egozcue, and J. Navarro
The importance of aneuploidy screening in reciprocal translocation carriers.
Reproduction, June 1, 2006; 131(6): 1025 - 1035.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
F. Vialard, C. Petit, M. Bergere, D. M. Gomes, V. Martel-Petit, R. Lombroso, Y. Ville, H. Gerard, and J. Selva
Evidence of a high proportion of premature unbalanced separation of sister chromatids in the first polar bodies of women of advanced age
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2006; 21(5): 1172 - 1178.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Mastenbroek, P. M.M.Bossuyt, M. J. Heineman, S. Repping, and F. van der Veen
Comment 1 on Staessen et al. (2004). Design and analysis of a randomized controlled trial studying preimplantation genetic screening
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2005; 20(8): 2362 - 2363.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
L. Wilton
Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and chromosome analysis of blastomeres using comparative genomic hybridization
Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2005; 11(1): 33 - 41.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. Staessen, P. Platteau, E. Van Assche, A. Michiels, H. Tournaye, M. Camus, P. Devroey, I. Liebaers, and A. Van Steirteghem
Comparison of blastocyst transfer with or without preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in couples with advanced maternal age: a prospective randomized controlled trial
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2004; 19(12): 2849 - 2858.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
ESHRE Capri Workshop Group
Diagnosis and management of the infertile couple: missing information
Hum. Reprod. Update, July 1, 2004; 10(4): 295 - 307.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
F. J. Los, D. Van Opstal, and C. van den Berg
The development of cytogenetically normal, abnormal and mosaic embryos: a theoretical model
Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2004; 10(1): 79 - 94.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Ziebe, K. Lundin, A. Loft, C. Bergh, A. Nyboe Andersen, U. Selleskog, D. Nielsen, C. Grondahl, H. Kim, and J.-C. Arce
FISH analysis for chromosomes 13, 16, 18, 21, 22, X and Y in all blastomeres of IVF pre-embryos from 144 randomly selected donated human oocytes and impact on pre-embryo morphology
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2003; 18(12): 2575 - 2581.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J.Y.H. Kwak-Kim, H.S. Chung-Bang, S.C. Ng, E.I. Ntrivalas, C.P. Mangubat, K.D. Beaman, A.E. Beer, and A. Gilman-Sachs
Increased T helper 1 cytokine responses by circulating T cells are present in women with recurrent pregnancy losses and in infertile women with multiple implantation failures after IVF
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2003; 18(4): 767 - 773.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. Rubio, C. Simon, F. Vidal, L. Rodrigo, T. Pehlivan, J. Remohi, and A. Pellicer
Chromosomal abnormalities and embryo development in recurrent miscarriage couples
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2003; 18(1): 182 - 188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
L. Voullaire, L. Wilton, J. McBain, T. Callaghan, and R. Williamson
Chromosome abnormalities identified by comparative genomic hybridization in embryos from women with repeated implantation failure
Mol. Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2002; 8(11): 1035 - 1041.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
G.A. Palmer, J. Traeger-Synodinos, S. Davies, M. Tzetis, C. Vrettou, M. Mastrominas, and E. Kanavakis
Pregnancies following blastocyst stage transfer in PGD cycles at risk for {beta}-thalassaemic haemoglobinopathies
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2002; 17(1): 25 - 31.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
L. Wilton, R. Williamson, J. McBain, D. Edgar, and L. Voullaire
Birth of a Healthy Infant after Preimplantation Confirmation of Euploidy by Comparative Genomic Hybridization
N. Engl. J. Med., November 22, 2001; 345(21): 1537 - 1541.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
S. Elias
Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis by Comparative Genomic Hybridization
N. Engl. J. Med., November 22, 2001; 345(21): 1569 - 1571.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
K. Yakin and S. Kahraman
Certain forms of morphological anomalies of spermatozoa may reflect chromosomal aneuploidies
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2001; 16(8): 1779 - 1780.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.