Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liow, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Ng, S. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Liow, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Ng, S. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 16, No. 1, 9-12, January 2001
© 2001 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Prognostic value of Y deletion analysis

How reliable is the outcome of Y deletion analysis in providing a sound prognosis?

Swee Lian Liow, Eu Leong Yong and Soon Chye Ng1,1

1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, National University Hospital, Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore 119074

Y chromosomal microdeletions at the azoospermia factor (AZF) locus have been implicated as one of the major causes of idiopathic male infertility. The availability of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in treating a variety of male infertility has raised the risk of the transmission of Y microdeletions from father to son. In many IVF centres, Y microdeletion analysis has been used as a diagnostic tool for genetic counselling of infertile couples. Presently, the only prognosis that can be derived from Y microdeletion analysis is that the affected male offspring would benefit from proper clinical management of their infertility. Prognoses based on the pattern of Y microdeletions in relation to phenotype are rather subjective and inconclusive because of insufficient data to derive a definitive correlation whose significance can be determined by statistical analysis. Standardization of the number and choice of sequence-tagged sites (STS), whose deletions result in defective spermatogenesis, for the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis of Y microdeletions would enhance its reliability in the interpretation of the results which is crucial for therapeutic decision-making. Furthermore, in-depth understanding of the gene functions in male infertility, especially at the AZF locus, would contribute greatly to the quality of the prognostic value of Y microdeletion analysis.

Key words: AZF/azoospermia/male infertility/prognosis/Y microdeletions

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: obgngsc{at}nus.edu.sg

This debate was previously published on Webtrack, www.oup.co.uk/humrep/comment on October 10, 2000


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
R. D. Oates, S. Silber, L. G. Brown, and D. C. Page
Clinical characterization of 42 oligospermic or azoospermic men with microdeletion of the AZFc region of the Y chromosome, and of 18 children conceived via ICSI
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2002; 17(11): 2813 - 2824.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C.M. Luetjens, J. Gromoll, M. Engelhardt, S. von Eckardstein, M. Bergmann, E. Nieschlag, and M. Simoni
Manifestation of Y-chromosomal deletions in the human testis: a morphometrical and immunohistochemical evaluation
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2002; 17(9): 2258 - 2266.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A.L. Buonadonna, F. Cariola, E. Caroppo, A.D. Carlo, P. Fiorente, M.C. Valenzano, G. D'Amato, and M. Gentile
Molecular and cytogenetic characterization of an azoospermic male with a de-novo Y;14 translocation and alternate centromere inactivation
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2002; 17(3): 564 - 569.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.