Human Reproduction, Vol. 16, No. 10, 2036-2038,
October 2001
© 2001 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
Debates continued |
Gamete donation and anonymity
Disclosure to children conceived with donor gametes should be optional
1 Hospital University of Pennsylvania, Center Reproductive Medicine and Surgery, 3400 Spruce Street, 106 Dulles Building, Philadelphia, PA and 2 University of Washington School of Law and School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Washington, USA
To force potential parents to tell their child of his/her genetic origin as a requirement for admission into an infertility programme is both wrong and discriminatory. In addition, comparing the practice of using donor gametes to conceive a child with adoption is incorrect for a number of reasons. In this article we make the argument that mandatory disclosure is both inappropriate and intrusive, and the presently available data do not justify a rigid position. Furthermore, no reasonable, practical system can be envisaged to guarantee compliance with mandatory disclosure. Although it is entirely reasonable at the time of consultation to encourage couples to consider their positions and obtain a mutual agreement on their future intent prior to treatment, the final decision on this should be a matter of free choice within the context of the couple's own value system.
Key words: assisted reproduction/donor anonymity/donor gametes/insemination/oocyte donation
3 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ppatrizio{at}obgyn.upenn.edu
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  N. Nikolettos, B. Asimakopoulos, and I. Hatzissabas Intrafamilial sperm donation: ethical questions and concerns Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2003; 18(5): 933 - 936. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|