Human Reproduction, Vol. 16, No. 11, 2267-2273,
November 2001
© 2001 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
Robertsonian translocationsreproductive risks and indications for preimplantation genetic diagnosis
1 Guy's & St Thomas' Centre for PGD, Cytogenetics Department 5th Floor, Guy's Tower, St Thomas Street, London SE1 9RT, 2 Clinical Genetics, 7th Floor, New Guy's House, St Thomas Street, London SE1 9RT and 3 Assisted Conception Unit, 10th Floor North Wing, St Thomas' Hospital, Lambeth Palace Road, London SE1 7EH, UK4
BACKGROUND: Robertsonian translocations carry reproductive risks that are dependent on the chromosomes involved and the sex of the carrier. We describe five couples that presented for preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD). METHODS: PGD was carried out using cleavage-stage (day 3) embryo biopsy, fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) with locus-specific probes, and day 4 embryo transfer. RESULTS: Couple A (45,XX,der(14;21)(q10;q10)) had two previous pregnancies, one with translocation trisomy 21. A successful singleton pregnancy followed two cycles of PGD. Couple B (45,XX,der(13;14)(q10;q10)) had four miscarriages, two with translocation trisomy 14. One cycle of PGD resulted in triplets. Couple C (45,XX,der(13;14)(q10;q10)) had four years of infertility; two cycles were unsuccessful. Couple D (45,XY,der(13;14)(q10;q10)) presented with oligozoospermia. A singleton pregnancy followed two cycles of PGD. Couple E (45,XY,der(13;14)(q10;q10)) had a sperm count within the normal range and low levels of aneuploid spermatozoa. PGD was therefore not recommended. No evidence for a high incidence of embryos with chaotic or mosaic chromosome complements was found. CONCLUSIONS: For fertile couples, careful risk assessment and genetic counselling should precede consideration for PGD. Where translocation couples need assisted conception for subfertility, PGD is a valuable screen for imbalance, even when the risk of viable chromosome abnormality is low.
Key words: PGD/reproductive risks/Robertsonian translocation
4 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: paul.scriven{at}gstt.sthames.nhs.uk
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Keymolen, C. Staessen, W. Verpoest, A. Michiels, M. Bonduelle, P. Haentjens, J. Vanderelst, and I. Liebaers A proposal for reproductive counselling in carriers of Robertsonian translocations: 10 years of experience with preimplantation genetic diagnosis Hum. Reprod., June 3, 2009; (2009) dep201v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R.H. Martin Cytogenetic determinants of male fertility Hum. Reprod. Update, June 4, 2008; (2008) dmn017v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.F. Portnoi, A. Aboura, G. Tachdjian, P. Bouchard, D. Dewailly, N. Bourcigaux, R. Frydman, A.-C. Reyss, S. Brisset, and S. Christin-Maitre Molecular cytogenetic studies of Xq critical regions in premature ovarian failure patients Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2006; 21(9): 2329 - 2334. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Hatakeyama, H. Gao, K. Harmer, and S. Ma Meiotic segregation patterns and ICSI pregnancy outcome of a rare (13;21) Robertsonian translocation carrier: a case report Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2006; 21(4): 976 - 979. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Brugnon, E. Van Assche, G. Verheyen, B. Sion, D. Boucher, J.L. Pouly, L. Janny, P. Devroey, I. Liebaers, and A. Van Steirteghem Study of two markers of apoptosis and meiotic segregation in ejaculated sperm of chromosomal translocation carrier patients Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2006; 21(3): 685 - 693. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Ogur, E. Van Assche, W. Vegetti, G. Verheyen, H. Tournaye, M. Bonduelle, A. Van Steirteghem, and I. Liebaers Chromosomal segregation in spermatozoa of 14 Robertsonian translocation carriers Mol. Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2006; 12(3): 209 - 215. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Baccetti, G. Collodel, R. Marzella, E. Moretti, P. Piomboni, G. Scapigliati, and F. Serafini Ultrastructural studies of spermatozoa from infertile males with Robertsonian translocations and 18, X, Y aneuploidies Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2005; 20(8): 2295 - 2300. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Anahory, S. Hamamah, B. Andreo, B. Hedon, M. Claustres, P. Sarda, and F. Pellestor Sperm segregation analysis of a (13;22) Robertsonian translocation carrier by FISH: a comparison of locus-specific probe and whole chromosome painting Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2005; 20(7): 1850 - 1854. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kumar and A. O'Brien Recent developments in fetal medicine BMJ, April 24, 2004; 328(7446): 1002 - 1006. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Robertson Extending preimplantation genetic diagnosis: the ethical debate: Ethical issues in new uses of preimplantation genetic diagnosis Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2003; 18(3): 465 - 471. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Rubio, C. Simon, F. Vidal, L. Rodrigo, T. Pehlivan, J. Remohi, and A. Pellicer Chromosomal abnormalities and embryo development in recurrent miscarriage couples Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2003; 18(1): 182 - 188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Gianaroli, M.C. Magli, A.P. Ferraretti, S. Munne, B. Balicchia, T. Escudero, and A. Crippa Possible interchromosomal effect in embryos generated by gametes from translocation carriers Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2002; 17(12): 3201 - 3207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



