Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (26)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scriven, P.N.
Right arrow Articles by Ogilvie, C. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scriven, P.N.
Right arrow Articles by Ogilvie, C. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 16, No. 11, 2267-2273, November 2001
© 2001 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Robertsonian translocations—reproductive risks and indications for preimplantation genetic diagnosis

P.N. Scriven1,4, F.A. Flinter2, P. R. Braude3 and C. Mackie Ogilvie1

1 Guy's & St Thomas' Centre for PGD, Cytogenetics Department 5th Floor, Guy's Tower, St Thomas Street, London SE1 9RT, 2 Clinical Genetics, 7th Floor, New Guy's House, St Thomas Street, London SE1 9RT and 3 Assisted Conception Unit, 10th Floor North Wing, St Thomas' Hospital, Lambeth Palace Road, London SE1 7EH, UK4

BACKGROUND: Robertsonian translocations carry reproductive risks that are dependent on the chromosomes involved and the sex of the carrier. We describe five couples that presented for preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD). METHODS: PGD was carried out using cleavage-stage (day 3) embryo biopsy, fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) with locus-specific probes, and day 4 embryo transfer. RESULTS: Couple A (45,XX,der(14;21)(q10;q10)) had two previous pregnancies, one with translocation trisomy 21. A successful singleton pregnancy followed two cycles of PGD. Couple B (45,XX,der(13;14)(q10;q10)) had four miscarriages, two with translocation trisomy 14. One cycle of PGD resulted in triplets. Couple C (45,XX,der(13;14)(q10;q10)) had four years of infertility; two cycles were unsuccessful. Couple D (45,XY,der(13;14)(q10;q10)) presented with oligozoospermia. A singleton pregnancy followed two cycles of PGD. Couple E (45,XY,der(13;14)(q10;q10)) had a sperm count within the normal range and low levels of aneuploid spermatozoa. PGD was therefore not recommended. No evidence for a high incidence of embryos with chaotic or mosaic chromosome complements was found. CONCLUSIONS: For fertile couples, careful risk assessment and genetic counselling should precede consideration for PGD. Where translocation couples need assisted conception for subfertility, PGD is a valuable screen for imbalance, even when the risk of viable chromosome abnormality is low.

Key words: PGD/reproductive risks/Robertsonian translocation

4 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: paul.scriven{at}gstt.sthames.nhs.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
K. Keymolen, C. Staessen, W. Verpoest, A. Michiels, M. Bonduelle, P. Haentjens, J. Vanderelst, and I. Liebaers
A proposal for reproductive counselling in carriers of Robertsonian translocations: 10 years of experience with preimplantation genetic diagnosis
Hum. Reprod., June 3, 2009; (2009) dep201v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
R.H. Martin
Cytogenetic determinants of male fertility
Hum. Reprod. Update, June 4, 2008; (2008) dmn017v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M.F. Portnoi, A. Aboura, G. Tachdjian, P. Bouchard, D. Dewailly, N. Bourcigaux, R. Frydman, A.-C. Reyss, S. Brisset, and S. Christin-Maitre
Molecular cytogenetic studies of Xq critical regions in premature ovarian failure patients
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2006; 21(9): 2329 - 2334.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. Hatakeyama, H. Gao, K. Harmer, and S. Ma
Meiotic segregation patterns and ICSI pregnancy outcome of a rare (13;21) Robertsonian translocation carrier: a case report
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2006; 21(4): 976 - 979.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
F. Brugnon, E. Van Assche, G. Verheyen, B. Sion, D. Boucher, J.L. Pouly, L. Janny, P. Devroey, I. Liebaers, and A. Van Steirteghem
Study of two markers of apoptosis and meiotic segregation in ejaculated sperm of chromosomal translocation carrier patients
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2006; 21(3): 685 - 693.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
G. Ogur, E. Van Assche, W. Vegetti, G. Verheyen, H. Tournaye, M. Bonduelle, A. Van Steirteghem, and I. Liebaers
Chromosomal segregation in spermatozoa of 14 Robertsonian translocation carriers
Mol. Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2006; 12(3): 209 - 215.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
B. Baccetti, G. Collodel, R. Marzella, E. Moretti, P. Piomboni, G. Scapigliati, and F. Serafini
Ultrastructural studies of spermatozoa from infertile males with Robertsonian translocations and 18, X, Y aneuploidies
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2005; 20(8): 2295 - 2300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
T. Anahory, S. Hamamah, B. Andreo, B. Hedon, M. Claustres, P. Sarda, and F. Pellestor
Sperm segregation analysis of a (13;22) Robertsonian translocation carrier by FISH: a comparison of locus-specific probe and whole chromosome painting
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2005; 20(7): 1850 - 1854.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
S. Kumar and A. O'Brien
Recent developments in fetal medicine
BMJ, April 24, 2004; 328(7446): 1002 - 1006.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. A. Robertson
Extending preimplantation genetic diagnosis: the ethical debate: Ethical issues in new uses of preimplantation genetic diagnosis
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2003; 18(3): 465 - 471.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. Rubio, C. Simon, F. Vidal, L. Rodrigo, T. Pehlivan, J. Remohi, and A. Pellicer
Chromosomal abnormalities and embryo development in recurrent miscarriage couples
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2003; 18(1): 182 - 188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
L. Gianaroli, M.C. Magli, A.P. Ferraretti, S. Munne, B. Balicchia, T. Escudero, and A. Crippa
Possible interchromosomal effect in embryos generated by gametes from translocation carriers
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2002; 17(12): 3201 - 3207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.