Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (30)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Strandell, A.
Right arrow Articles by Thorburn, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Strandell, A.
Right arrow Articles by Thorburn, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 16, No. 11, 2403-2410, November 2001
© 2001 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Hydrosalpinx and IVF outcome: cumulative results after salpingectomy in a randomized controlled trial*

A. Strandell1,4, A. Lindhard2, U. Waldenström3 and J. Thorburn1

1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, S-413 45 Göteborg, Sweden, 2 The Fertility Clinic, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark and 3 IVF Center Falun, Falu Hospital, S-791 82 Falun, Sweden

BACKGROUND: A randomized controlled trial of salpingectomy prior to IVF in patients with hydrosalpinges has been conducted in Scandinavia. The results from the first transfer cycle have been published and clearly demonstrated an improved pregnancy outcome after salpingectomy had been performed in patients with hydrosalpinges large enough to be visible on ultrasound. The present article is aimed at analysing the effect of salpingectomy on cumulative birth rate, including all individual transfer cycles. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 186 women underwent 452 cycles. Among the 77 women randomized to no surgical intervention, 24 underwent salpingectomy after one or two failed cycles. Cumulative results were analysed by Cox regression, taking into account the number of cycles per patient and the presence of a salpingectomy after a previous transfer. Salpingectomy implied a significant increase in birth rate (hazard ratio 2.1, 95% CI 1.6–3.6, P = 0.014). Within the subgroup of patients with ultrasound-visible hydrosalpinges, the birth rate was even higher (hazard ratio 3.8, 95% CI 1.5–9.2, P = 0.004). Implantation rate was significantly higher in patients who had undergone salpingectomy (27.2% versus 20.2, P = 0.03) and, in the subgroup of patients with ultrasound-visible hydrosalpinges, the difference was even larger (30.3% versus 17.1%, P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the cumulative cycles strengthen the recommendation for a laparoscopic salpingectomy prior to IVF in patients with ultrasound-visible hydrosalpinges.

Key words: cumulative pregnancy rates/hydrosalpinx/IVF/randomized controlled trial/salpingectomy

* The study group for the multicentre trial and responsible investigator at each site were as follows. Sweden: Annika Strandell, Dept Ob/Gyn, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg; Urban Waldenström, IVF Center Falun, Falu Hospital, Falun; Niklas Simberg, Dept Ob/Gyn, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala; Leif Hägglund, International Fertility Center, Malmö; György Csemiczky, Dept Ob/Gyn, Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm. Denmark: Anette Lindhard, The Fertility Clinic, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital, Copenhagen. Norway: Vidar von Düring, Dept Ob/Gyn, Trondheim; Kari Flo, Dept Ob/Gyn, University of Tromsø. Iceland: GuPmundur Arason, Dept Ob/Gyn, National University Hospital, Reykjavik.

4 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: annika.strandell{at}medfak.gu.se


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Reproductive SciencesHome page
G. Weiss, L. T. Goldsmith, R. N. Taylor, D. Bellet, and H. S. Taylor
Inflammation in Reproductive Disorders
Reproductive Sciences, February 1, 2009; 16(2): 216 - 229.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
K. Wanggren, P.G. Lalitkumar, F. Hambiliki, B. Stabi, K. Gemzell-Danielsson, and A. Stavreus-Evers
Leukaemia inhibitory factor receptor and gp130 in the human Fallopian tube and endometrium before and after mifepristone treatment and in the human preimplantation embryo
Mol. Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2007; 13(6): 391 - 397.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Strandell, A. Lindhard, and I. Eckerlund
Cost--effectiveness analysis of salpingectomy prior to IVF, based on a randomized controlled trial
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2005; 20(12): 3284 - 3292.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E. Seli, U. A. Kayisli, H. Cakmak, O. Bukulmez, I. Bildirici, O. Guzeloglu-Kayisli, and A. Arici
Removal of hydrosalpinges increases endometrial leukaemia inhibitory factor (LIF) expression at the time of the implantation window
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2005; 20(11): 3012 - 3017.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
L. C. Ajonuma, E. H. Y. Ng, P. H. Chow, C. Y. Hung, L. L. Tsang, A. N. Y. Cheung, C. Brito-Jones, I. H. Lok, C. J.Haines, and H. C. Chan
Increased cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) expression in the human hydrosalpinx
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2005; 20(5): 1228 - 1234.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. A. Akman, H. F. Erden, and M. Bahceci
Endometrial fluid visualized through ultrasonography during ovarian stimulation in IVF cycles impairs the outcome in tubal factor, but not PCOS, patients
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2005; 20(4): 906 - 909.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
H. Fernandez and A. Gervaise
Ectopic pregnancies after infertility treatment: modern diagnosis and therapeutic strategy
Hum. Reprod. Update, November 1, 2004; 10(6): 503 - 513.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. W. Sagoskin, B. A. Lessey, G. L. Mottla, K. S. Richter, R. J. Chetkowski, A. S. Chang, M. J. Levy, and R. J. Stillman
Salpingectomy or proximal tubal occlusion of unilateral hydrosalpinx increases the potential for spontaneous pregnancy
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2003; 18(12): 2634 - 2637.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
P. M. Lam, C. Briton-Jones, C. K. Cheung, L. S. Po, L. P. Cheung, and C. Haines
Increased mRNA expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptor (flt-1) in the hydrosalpinx
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2003; 18(11): 2264 - 2269.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
S. Smith, S. M. Pfeifer, and J. A. Collins
Diagnosis and Management of Female Infertility
JAMA, October 1, 2003; 290(13): 1767 - 1770.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Strandell and A. Lindhard
Why does hydrosalpinx reduce fertility?: The importance of hydrosalpinx fluid
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2002; 17(5): 1141 - 1145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.