Human Reproduction, Vol. 16, No. 11, 2427-2433,
November 2001
© 2001 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
Ultrasonography compared with magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: correlation with histopathology
1 Departments of Radiology, 2 Pathology and 3 Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hôpital Tenon, 4 rue de la Chine, 75020, France,
BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to compare the accuracy of transabdominal (TAUS) and transvaginal sonography (TVUS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the diagnosis of adenomyosis, and to correlate imaging with histological findings. METHODS: In a prospective study, 120 consecutive patients referred for hysterectomy underwent TAUS, TVUS and MRI. Results of these examinations were interpreted blindly to histopathological findings. RESULTS: Histological prevalence of adenomyosis and leiomyomas was 33.0 and 47.5% respectively. Adenomyotic uteri were accompanied by additional pelvic disorders in 82.5% of cases. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of TAUS and TVUS were 32.5 and 65.0%, 95.0 and 97.5%, 76.4 and 92.8%, and 73.8 and 88.8% respectively. Myometrial cyst was the most sensitive and specific TVUS criterion. In MRI, the presence of a high-signal-intensity myometrial spot was as specific but less sensitive than a maximal junctional zone thickness (JZmax) >12 mm and a JZmax to myometrial thickness ratio >40%. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of MRI were 77.5, 92.5, 83.8 and 89.2% respectively. No difference in accuracy was found between TVUS and MRI, but sensitivity was lower with sonography in women with associated myomas. CONCLUSIONS: TVUS is as efficient as MRI for the diagnosis of adenomyosis in women without myoma, while MRI could be recommended for women with associated leiomyoma.
Key words: adenomyosis/leiomyoma/MRI/ultrasound/uterus
4 To whom correspondence is addressed at: Service de Radiologie, Hôpital Tenon, 4 rue de la Chine, 75020,Paris, France. E-mail: marc.bazot{at}tnn.ap-hop-paris.fr
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Tropeano, S. Amoroso, and G. Scambia Non-surgical management of uterine fibroids Hum. Reprod. Update, May 1, 2008; 14(3): 259 - 274. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Somigliana, P. Vercellini, R. Daguati, R. Pasin, O. De Giorgi, and P.G. Crosignani Fibroids and female reproduction: a critical analysis of the evidence Hum. Reprod. Update, September 1, 2007; 13(5): 465 - 476. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Hobson, M. Z. Kiss, T. Varghese, A. M. Sommer, M. A. Kliewer, J. A. Zagzebski, T. J. Hall, J. Harter, E. M. Hartenbach, and E. L. Madsen In Vitro Uterine Strain Imaging: Preliminary Results J. Ultrasound Med., July 1, 2007; 26(7): 899 - 908. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-J. Jeng, S.-H. Huang, J. Shen, C.-S. Chou, and C.-R. Tzeng Laparoscopy-guided myometrial biopsy in the definite diagnosis of diffuse adenomyosis Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2007; 22(7): 2016 - 2019. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Bazot, C. Bornier, G. Dubernard, G. Roseau, A. Cortez, and E. Darai Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and rectal endoscopic sonography for the prediction of location of deep pelvic endometriosis Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2007; 22(5): 1457 - 1463. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Chopra, A. S. Lev-Toaff, F. Ors, and D. Bergin Adenomyosis:common and uncommon manifestations on sonography and magnetic resonance imaging. J. Ultrasound Med., May 1, 2006; 25(5): 617 - 627. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Dubernard, M. Piketty, R. Rouzier, S. Houry, M. Bazot, and E. Darai Quality of life after laparoscopic colorectal resection for endometriosis Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2006; 21(5): 1243 - 1247. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T T Zacharia and M J O'Neill Prevalence and distribution of adnexal findings suggesting endometriosis in patients with MR diagnosis of adenomyosis. Br. J. Radiol., April 1, 2006; 79(940): 303 - 307. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Bazot, O. Fiori, and E. Darai Adenomyosis in endometriosis - prevalence and impact on fertility. Evidence from magnetic resonance imaging. Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2006; 21(4): 1101 - 1102. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Kitamura, S. J. Allison, R. C. Jha, J. B. Spies, P. A. Flick, and S. M. Ascher MRI of adenomyosis: changes with uterine artery embolization. Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2006; 186(3): 855 - 864. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-P. Pelage, D. Jacob, A. Fazel, J. Namur, A. Laurent, R. Rymer, and O. Le Dref Midterm Results of Uterine Artery Embolization for Symptomatic Adenomyosis: Initial Experience Radiology, March 1, 2005; 234(3): 948 - 953. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Tamai, K. Togashi, T. Ito, N. Morisawa, T. Fujiwara, and T. Koyama MR Imaging Findings of Adenomyosis: Correlation with Histopathologic Features and Diagnostic Pitfalls RadioGraphics, January 1, 2005; 25(1): 21 - 40. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Bazot, E. Darai, R. Hourani, I. Thomassin, A. Cortez, S. Uzan, and J.-N. Buy Deep Pelvic Endometriosis: MR Imaging for Diagnosis and Prediction of Extension of Disease Radiology, August 1, 2004; 232(2): 379 - 389. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Bazot, E. Darai, S. C. de Givry, F. Boudghene, S. Uzan, and A. F. Le Blanche Fast Breath-Hold T2-Weighted MR Imaging Reduces Interobserver Variability in the Diagnosis of Adenomyosis Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2003; 180(5): 1291 - 1296. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. L. Williams, S. L. Laifer-Narin, and N. Ragavendra US of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding RadioGraphics, May 1, 2003; 23(3): 703 - 718. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||






