Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (51)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bazot, M.
Right arrow Articles by Uzan, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bazot, M.
Right arrow Articles by Uzan, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 16, No. 11, 2427-2433, November 2001
© 2001 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Ultrasonography compared with magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: correlation with histopathology

Marc Bazot1,4, Annie Cortez2, Emile Darai3, Jérome Rouger1, Jocelyne Chopier1, Jean-Marie Antoine3 and Serge Uzan3

1 Departments of Radiology, 2 Pathology and 3 Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hôpital Tenon, 4 rue de la Chine, 75020, France,

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to compare the accuracy of transabdominal (TAUS) and transvaginal sonography (TVUS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the diagnosis of adenomyosis, and to correlate imaging with histological findings. METHODS: In a prospective study, 120 consecutive patients referred for hysterectomy underwent TAUS, TVUS and MRI. Results of these examinations were interpreted blindly to histopathological findings. RESULTS: Histological prevalence of adenomyosis and leiomyomas was 33.0 and 47.5% respectively. Adenomyotic uteri were accompanied by additional pelvic disorders in 82.5% of cases. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of TAUS and TVUS were 32.5 and 65.0%, 95.0 and 97.5%, 76.4 and 92.8%, and 73.8 and 88.8% respectively. Myometrial cyst was the most sensitive and specific TVUS criterion. In MRI, the presence of a high-signal-intensity myometrial spot was as specific but less sensitive than a maximal junctional zone thickness (JZmax) >12 mm and a JZmax to myometrial thickness ratio >40%. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of MRI were 77.5, 92.5, 83.8 and 89.2% respectively. No difference in accuracy was found between TVUS and MRI, but sensitivity was lower with sonography in women with associated myomas. CONCLUSIONS: TVUS is as efficient as MRI for the diagnosis of adenomyosis in women without myoma, while MRI could be recommended for women with associated leiomyoma.

Key words: adenomyosis/leiomyoma/MRI/ultrasound/uterus

4 To whom correspondence is addressed at: Service de Radiologie, Hôpital Tenon, 4 rue de la Chine, 75020,Paris, France. E-mail: marc.bazot{at}tnn.ap-hop-paris.fr


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
G. Tropeano, S. Amoroso, and G. Scambia
Non-surgical management of uterine fibroids
Hum. Reprod. Update, May 1, 2008; 14(3): 259 - 274.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
E. Somigliana, P. Vercellini, R. Daguati, R. Pasin, O. De Giorgi, and P.G. Crosignani
Fibroids and female reproduction: a critical analysis of the evidence
Hum. Reprod. Update, September 1, 2007; 13(5): 465 - 476.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
M. A. Hobson, M. Z. Kiss, T. Varghese, A. M. Sommer, M. A. Kliewer, J. A. Zagzebski, T. J. Hall, J. Harter, E. M. Hartenbach, and E. L. Madsen
In Vitro Uterine Strain Imaging: Preliminary Results
J. Ultrasound Med., July 1, 2007; 26(7): 899 - 908.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C.-J. Jeng, S.-H. Huang, J. Shen, C.-S. Chou, and C.-R. Tzeng
Laparoscopy-guided myometrial biopsy in the definite diagnosis of diffuse adenomyosis
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2007; 22(7): 2016 - 2019.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Bazot, C. Bornier, G. Dubernard, G. Roseau, A. Cortez, and E. Darai
Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and rectal endoscopic sonography for the prediction of location of deep pelvic endometriosis
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2007; 22(5): 1457 - 1463.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
S. Chopra, A. S. Lev-Toaff, F. Ors, and D. Bergin
Adenomyosis:common and uncommon manifestations on sonography and magnetic resonance imaging.
J. Ultrasound Med., May 1, 2006; 25(5): 617 - 627.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
G. Dubernard, M. Piketty, R. Rouzier, S. Houry, M. Bazot, and E. Darai
Quality of life after laparoscopic colorectal resection for endometriosis
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2006; 21(5): 1243 - 1247.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
T T Zacharia and M J O'Neill
Prevalence and distribution of adnexal findings suggesting endometriosis in patients with MR diagnosis of adenomyosis.
Br. J. Radiol., April 1, 2006; 79(940): 303 - 307.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Bazot, O. Fiori, and E. Darai
Adenomyosis in endometriosis - prevalence and impact on fertility. Evidence from magnetic resonance imaging.
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2006; 21(4): 1101 - 1102.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
Y. Kitamura, S. J. Allison, R. C. Jha, J. B. Spies, P. A. Flick, and S. M. Ascher
MRI of adenomyosis: changes with uterine artery embolization.
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2006; 186(3): 855 - 864.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J.-P. Pelage, D. Jacob, A. Fazel, J. Namur, A. Laurent, R. Rymer, and O. Le Dref
Midterm Results of Uterine Artery Embolization for Symptomatic Adenomyosis: Initial Experience
Radiology, March 1, 2005; 234(3): 948 - 953.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
K. Tamai, K. Togashi, T. Ito, N. Morisawa, T. Fujiwara, and T. Koyama
MR Imaging Findings of Adenomyosis: Correlation with Histopathologic Features and Diagnostic Pitfalls
RadioGraphics, January 1, 2005; 25(1): 21 - 40.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Bazot, E. Darai, R. Hourani, I. Thomassin, A. Cortez, S. Uzan, and J.-N. Buy
Deep Pelvic Endometriosis: MR Imaging for Diagnosis and Prediction of Extension of Disease
Radiology, August 1, 2004; 232(2): 379 - 389.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Bazot, E. Darai, S. C. de Givry, F. Boudghene, S. Uzan, and A. F. Le Blanche
Fast Breath-Hold T2-Weighted MR Imaging Reduces Interobserver Variability in the Diagnosis of Adenomyosis
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2003; 180(5): 1291 - 1296.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
P. L. Williams, S. L. Laifer-Narin, and N. Ragavendra
US of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding
RadioGraphics, May 1, 2003; 23(3): 703 - 718.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.