Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (66)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lundin, K.
Right arrow Articles by Hardarson, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lundin, K.
Right arrow Articles by Hardarson, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 16, No. 12, 2652-2657, December 2001
© 2001 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Early embryo cleavage is a strong indicator of embryo quality in human IVF

K. Lundin,1, C. Bergh and T. Hardarson

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Göteborg University, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden

BACKGROUND: In order to decrease multiple birth rates without decreasing birth rates overall, it is important to increase the capability of selecting the most optimal embryos for transfer. It has been shown that human embryos which cleave early, i.e. complete the first mitotic division within 25–27 h post insemination, provide higher pregnancy and implantation rates. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this prospective study, an evaluation of 10 798 scored embryos showed that early cleavage resulted in a significantly higher proportion of good quality embryos compared with late cleavage (62.5 versus 33.4%, P < 0.0001). When examining both day 2 and day 3 transfers together, early-cleaving embryos (306 transfers) gave rise to significantly higher rates of pregnancy/transfer (40.5 versus 31.3%, P = 0.0049), implantation (28.0 versus 19.5%, P = 0.0001) and birth/ongoing pregnancy (34.3 versus 24.0%, P = 0.0009) than did late-cleaving embryos (521 transfers). A stepwise logistic regression of all data showed that the total number of good quality embryos and female age were independent predictors of both pregnancies and birth. For intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) embryos, early cleavage was found to be an independent predictor of birth. CONCLUSIONS: Early embryo cleavage is a strong biological indicator of embryo potential, and may be used as an additional embryo selection factor for ICSI embryos.

Key words: early cleavage/embryo quality/good quality embryos/IVF/pregnancy

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: IVF-lab, Reproductive Medicine, SU/Sahlgrenska, SE-413 45 Göteborg, Sweden. E-mail: kersti.lundin{at}medfak.gu.se


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
V. Y. Fujimoto, J. P. Kane, B. Y. Ishida, M. S. Bloom, and R. W. Browne
High-density lipoprotein metabolism and the human embryo
Hum. Reprod. Update, August 28, 2009; (2009) dmp029v2.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
S. Assou, D. Haouzi, K. Mahmoud, A. Aouacheria, Y. Guillemin, V. Pantesco, T. Reme, H. Dechaud, J. De Vos, and S. Hamamah
A non-invasive test for assessing embryo potential by gene expression profiles of human cumulus cells: a proof of concept study
Mol. Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2008; 14(12): 711 - 719.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
N. Ledee, R. Lombroso, L. Lombardelli, J. Selva, S. Dubanchet, G. Chaouat, F. Frankenne, J.M. Foidart, E. Maggi, S. Romagnani, et al.
Cytokines and chemokines in follicular fluids and potential of the corresponding embryo: the role of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2008; 23(9): 2001 - 2009.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C.G. Vergouw, L.L. Botros, P. Roos, J.W. Lens, R. Schats, P.G.A. Hompes, D.H. Burns, and C.B Lambalk
Metabolomic profiling by near-infrared spectroscopy as a tool to assess embryo viability: a novel, non-invasive method for embryo selection
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2008; 23(7): 1499 - 1504.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
A. P.A. van Montfoort, J. P.M. Geraedts, J. C.M. Dumoulin, A. P.M. Stassen, J. L.H. Evers, and T. A.Y. Ayoubi
Differential gene expression in cumulus cells as a prognostic indicator of embryo viability: a microarray analysis
Mol. Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2008; 14(3): 157 - 168.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
N. R Mtango and K. E Latham
Differential Expression of Cell Cycle Genes in Rhesus Monkey Oocytes and Embryos of Different Developmental Potentials
Biol Reprod, February 1, 2008; 78(2): 254 - 266.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
D. A. Gook and D. H. Edgar
Human oocyte cryopreservation
Hum. Reprod. Update, November 1, 2007; 13(6): 591 - 605.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
P. J Booth, T. J Watson, and H. J Leese
Prediction of Porcine Blastocyst Formation Using Morphological, Kinetic, and Amino Acid Depletion and Appearance Criteria Determined During the Early Cleavage of In Vitro-Produced Embryos
Biol Reprod, November 1, 2007; 77(5): 765 - 779.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Ziebe, K. Lundin, R. Janssens, L. Helmgaard, J.-C. Arce, and for the MERIT (Menotrophin vs Recombinant FSH in v
Influence of ovarian stimulation with HP-hMG or recombinant FSH on embryo quality parameters in patients undergoing IVF
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2007; 22(9): 2404 - 2413.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
F. Guerif, A. Le Gouge, B. Giraudeau, J. Poindron, R. Bidault, O. Gasnier, and D. Royere
Limited value of morphological assessment at days 1 and 2 to predict blastocyst development potential: A prospective study based on 4042 embryos
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2007; 22(7): 1973 - 1981.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J.-C. Arce, S. Ziebe, K. Lundin, R. Janssens, L. Helmgaard, and P. Sorensen
Interobserver agreement and intraobserver reproducibility of embryo quality assessments
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2006; 21(8): 2141 - 2148.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. N. James, S. Hennessy, B. Reggio, K. Wiemer, F. Larsen, and J. Cohen
The limited importance of pronuclear scoring of human zygotes
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2006; 21(6): 1599 - 1604.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J.-C. Arce, A. Nyboe Andersen, and J. Collins
Resolving methodological and clinical issues in the design of efficacy trials in assisted reproductive technologies: a mini-review
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2005; 20(7): 1757 - 1771.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Thurin, T. Hardarson, J. Hausken, B. Jablonowska, K. Lundin, A. Pinborg, and C. Bergh
Predictors of ongoing implantation in IVF in a good prognosis group of patients
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2005; 20(7): 1876 - 1880.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
Y. Shen, T. Stalf, C. Mehnert, U. Eichenlaub-Ritter, and H.-R. Tinneberg
High magnitude of light retardation by the zona pellucida is associated with conception cycles
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2005; 20(6): 1596 - 1606.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
J. M.R. Gerris
Single embryo transfer and IVF/ICSI outcome: a balanced appraisal
Hum. Reprod. Update, March 1, 2005; 11(2): 105 - 121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. P.A. Van Montfoort, J. C.M. Dumoulin, A. D.M. Kester, and J. L.H. Evers
Early cleavage is a valuable addition to existing embryo selection parameters: a study using single embryo transfers
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2004; 19(9): 2103 - 2108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M.-L. Windt, T.F. Kruger, K. Coetzee, and C.J. Lombard
Comparative analysis of pregnancy rates after the transfer of early dividing embryos versus slower dividing embryos
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2004; 19(5): 1155 - 1162.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
L. R. Fraser and O. O. Osiguwa
Human sperm responses to calcitonin, angiotensin II and fertilization-promoting peptide in prepared semen samples from normal donors and infertility patients
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2004; 19(3): 596 - 606.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
V. Soderstrom-Anttila, S. Vilska, S. Makinen, T. Foudila, and A.-M. Suikkari
Elective single embryo transfer yields good delivery rates in oocyte donation
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2003; 18(9): 1858 - 1863.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Tiitinen, L. Unkila-Kallio, M. Halttunen, and C. Hyden-Granskog
Impact of elective single embryo transfer on the twin pregnancy rate
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2003; 18(7): 1449 - 1453.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E. Neuber, P. Rinaudo, J.R. Trimarchi, and D. Sakkas
Sequential assessment of individually cultured human embryos as an indicator of subsequent good quality blastocyst development
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2003; 18(6): 1307 - 1312.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Salumets, C. Hyden-Granskog, S. Makinen, A.-M. Suikkari, A. Tiitinen, and T. Tuuri
Early cleavage predicts the viability of human embryos in elective single embryo transfer procedures
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2003; 18(4): 821 - 825.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.