Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (35)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ferland, R.
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, P.K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ferland, R.
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, P.K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 16, No. 12, 2718-2723, December 2001
© 2001 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Evaluation of a sprayable polyethylene glycol adhesion barrier in a porcine efficacy model

R. Ferland1,3, D. Mulani2 and P.K. Campbell2

1 Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI 02905 and 2 Confluent Surgical Inc., 101A First Avenue, Waltham, MA 02451, USA

BACKGROUND: The formation of adhesions following pelvic surgery remains one of the leading causes of infertility, small bowel obstruction and re-operation for pelvic pain. A novel hydrophilic polyethylene glycol based adhesion barrier (SprayGel) is formed by simultaneously spraying two liquid precursors onto surgical sites. The liquids polymerize to form a gel that effectively coats and adheres to tissue. After about 5 days, the hydrogel layer is absorbed and subsequently undergoes renal clearance. It is believed that the presence of such a barrier would inhibit the formation of adhesions following surgical insult. METHODS: A porcine adhesion model was developed wherein bilateral uterine horn transection and re-anastomosis, along with peritoneal side wall excision was performed via laparotomy. In each animal (n = 10, including the pilot study) one pelvic side wall was treated with adhesion barrier, while the contralateral side remained untreated. RESULTS: At second look laparoscopy, 90% of the untreated sites had adhesions, compared with 30% of the treated sites (P = 0.006). Also observed were statistically significant reductions in the adhesion extent (P = 0.029) and adhesion severity scores (P = 0.023) at the treated sites. However, if the pilot study was excluded (n = 8) the differences obtained were no longer significant. CONCLUSIONS: Polyethylene glycol (SprayGel) merits further investigation as an effective barrier to the formation of post-operative adhesions in this porcine model.

Key words: adhesion prevention/post-surgical adhesions/large animal models/laparoscopy/adhesion barriers

3 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: 695 Eddy St., Providence, RI 02905, USA. E-mail: roger_ferland{at}brown.edu

Statement of commercial interest

D.Mulani is a former employee while P.K.Campbell is a current employee of Confluent Surgical Inc. R.Ferland is a consultant to Confluent Surgical Inc.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
C. Nappi, A. Di Spiezio Sardo, E. Greco, M. Guida, S. Bettocchi, and G. Bifulco
Prevention of adhesions in gynaecological endoscopy
Hum. Reprod. Update, July 1, 2007; 13(4): 379 - 394.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
G. Acunzo, M. Guida, M. Pellicano, G. A. Tommaselli, A. Di Spiezio Sardo, G. Bifulco, D. Cirillo, A. Taylor, and C. Nappi
Effectiveness of auto-cross-linked hyaluronic acid gel in the prevention of intrauterine adhesions after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis: a prospective, randomized, controlled study
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2003; 18(9): 1918 - 1921.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.