Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nilsson, C.H.
Right arrow Articles by Huhtaniemi, I.T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nilsson, C.H.
Right arrow Articles by Huhtaniemi, I.T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 16, No. 2, 230-235, February 2001
© 2001 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Disparate response of wild-type and variant forms of LH to GnRH stimulation in individuals heterozygous for the LHß variant allele

C.H. Nilsson1,,3, M. Kaleva2, H. Virtanen2, A.M. Haavisto2, K. Pettersson1 and I.T. Huhtaniemi2

1 Departments of Biotechnology and 2 Physiology, University of Turku, Finland

There is a common genetic variant of LH due to two amino acid changes in the LHß subunit, Trp8Arg and Ile15Thr. In order to compare the relative activities of wild type (wt-LH) and variant LHß (v-LHß) genes in LH production and secretion, we performed gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) stimulation tests for healthy females (n = 7) and males (n = 10) heterozygous for the v-LHß allele. Blood samples were drawn up to 180 min after injection of GnRH. The serum samples were subjected to two immunofluorometric assays, one detecting wt hormone, the other detecting equally both LH types. The wt/total ratio increased significantly (P <= 0.016) after GnRH injection in males. This indicates that the proportion of wt-LH increases in the circulation in men but not in women, and that women consequently secrete relatively more v-LH. An in-vitro bioassay was performed on 0 and 60 min samples, and the bio/immunoreactivity (B/I) ratio decreased in both sexes (P = 0.010–0.012). This supports the previously reported lower B/I ratio of wt than v-LH, since wt-LH is expected to accumulate in circulation because of its longer half-life. In conclusion, these findings demonstrate that wt- and v-LH respond differently to GnRH stimulation in men and women heterozygous for v-LHß. These results are in agreement with previously documented differences of the two forms in circulation, as well as with different promoter activities of the two LHß alleles.

Key words: bioassay/GnRH stimulation test/immunoassay/luteinizing hormone/variant

3 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Department of Biotechnology, University of Turku, Tykistökatu 6A, 6th floor, 20520 Turku, Finland. E-mail: christel.nilsson{at}wallac.fi


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.