Human Reproduction, Vol. 16, No. 3, 469-475,
March 2001
© 2001 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
Efficacy, tolerability and acceptability of a novel contraceptive vaginal ring releasing etonogestrel and ethinyl oestradiol
1 Atrium Medisch Centrum, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heerlen, The Netherlands, 2 Väestöliitto, Department of Gynecology, Helsinki, Finland and 3 Clinical Development Department, Contraception, NV Organon, Oss, The Netherlands
A novel contraceptive vaginal ring releasing etonogestrel 120 µg and ethinyl oestradiol 15 µg daily over a period of 3 weeks was tested. Each ring was used for one cycle, comprising 3 weeks of ring use followed by a 1 week ring-free period. This 1 year, multicentre study assessed the contraceptive efficacy, cycle control, tolerability and acceptability of the contraceptive. Altogether, 1145 women were exposed to the vaginal ring for 12 109 cycles (928 woman-years). Six pregnancies occurred during treatment, giving a Pearl Index of 0.65 (95% confidence interval 0.241.41). Cycle control was very good, since irregular bleeding was rare (2.66.4% of evaluable cycles) and withdrawal bleeding (mean duration 4.75.3 days) occurred in 97.999.4% of evaluable cycles. Compliance to the prescribed regimen was high with criteria being fulfilled in 90.8% of cycles. The ring was well tolerated. The majority of women considered this new contraceptive method easy to use, and it offers an effective, convenient, well-accepted and novel method for hormonal contraception.
Key words: acceptability/efficacy/ethinyl oestradiol/etonogestrel/vaginal ring
4 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Atrium Medisch Centrum, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, H. Dunantstraat 5, P.O.Box 4446, 6401 CX Heerlen, The Netherlands. E-mail: roumenfj{at}knmg.nl
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. A. Fisher and A. Black Contraception in Canada: a review of method choices, characteristics, adherence and approaches to counselling Can. Med. Assoc. J., March 27, 2007; 176(7): 953 - 961. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Milsom, I. Lete, A. Bjertnaes, K. Rokstad, I. Lindh, C.J. Gruber, M.H. Birkhauser, E. Aubeny, T. Knudsen, and C. Bastianelli Effects on cycle control and bodyweight of the combined contraceptive ring, NuvaRing, versus an oral contraceptive containing 30 {micro}g ethinyl estradiol and 3 mg drospirenone Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2006; 21(9): 2304 - 2311. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. S. David, E. A. Boatwright, B. S. Tozer, D. P. Verma, J. E. Blair, A. P. Mayer, and J. A. Files Hormonal Contraception Update Mayo Clin. Proc., July 1, 2006; 81(7): 949 - 955. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Crosignani, D. Olive, A. Bergqvist, and A. Luciano Advances in the management of endometriosis: an update for clinicians Hum. Reprod. Update, March 1, 2006; 12(2): 179 - 189. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Massai, L. Makarainen, A. Kuukankorpi, C. Klipping, I. Duijkers, and T. Dieben The combined contraceptive vaginal ring and bone mineral density in healthy pre-menopausal women Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2005; 20(10): 2764 - 2768. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Oddsson, B. Leifels-Fischer, D. Wiel-Masson, N.R. de Melo, C. Benedetto, C.H.J. Verhoeven, and T.O.M. Dieben Superior cycle control with a contraceptive vaginal ring compared with an oral contraceptive containing 30 {micro}g ethinylestradiol and 150 {micro}g levonorgestrel: a randomized trial Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2005; 20(2): 557 - 562. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. C. Raney and J. Methot Recent Advances in Hormonal and Barrier Contraception Journal of Pharmacy Practice, June 1, 2003; 16(3): 209 - 217. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Long-Acting Contraceptives: Effective and Convenient Journal Watch Women's Health, May 7, 2003; 2003(507): 6 - 6. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
T. M.T. Mulders, T. O.M. Dieben, and H. J.T.C. Bennink Ovarian function with a novel combined contraceptive vaginal ring Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2002; 17(10): 2594 - 2599. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||





