Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (29)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ortmann, O.
Right arrow Articles by Diedrich, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ortmann, O.
Right arrow Articles by Diedrich, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 16, No. 4, 608-611, April 2001
© 2001 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology


Debates Continued

Embryo implantation and GnRH antagonists

Ovarian actions of GnRH antagonists

O. Ortmann,1, J.M. Weiss and K. Diedrich

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538 Lübeck, Germany

The gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists, cetrorelix and ganirelix, have both been approved for ovarian stimulation to prevent a premature LH surge. Since GnRH receptors and their gene expression have been detected in human ovary, concern has risen over whether GnRH antagonists might affect ovarian function. Three large trials which compared GnRH agonists (used in the standard protocol worldwide), with the new antagonist treatment found no significant differences concerning the most important goals, e.g. pregnancy rate, fertilization and quality of oocytes. However, the concentration of oestradiol, and the pregnancy and implantation rates were lower in GnRH antagonist-treated patients. These findings again fuelled the debate about the possible extrapituitary effects of GnRH antagonists. Here, we review the conflicting data in the literature on the ovarian effects of GnRH antagonists and discuss our own results. In our view, it is unlikely that GnRH antagonists have a relevant impact on ovarian steroidogenesis and function; however, GnRH antagonists may exert other effects on the ovary.

Key words: embryo implantation/GnRH antagonists/ovarian effects/ovarian stimulation protocols/steroidogenesis

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ortmann{at}medinf.mu-luebeck.de

This debate was previously published on Webtrack (www.oup.co.uk/humrep/comment) on December 7, 2000


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Reproductive SciencesHome page
C. Metallinou, B. Asimakopoulos, A. Schroer, and N. Nikolettos
Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone in the Ovary
Reproductive Sciences, December 1, 2007; 14(8): 737 - 749.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
H.-C. Ruan, X.-M. Zhu, Q. Luo, A.-X. Liu, Y.-L. Qian, C.-Y. Zhou, F. Jin, H.-F. Huang, and J.-Z. Sheng
Ovarian stimulation with GnRH agonist, but not GnRH antagonist, partially restores the expression of endometrial integrin beta3 and leukaemia-inhibitory factor and improves uterine receptivity in mice
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2006; 21(10): 2521 - 2529.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
Y. S. Choi, S.-Y. Ku, B.-C. Jee, C.-S. Suh, Y. M. Choi, J. G. Kim, S. Y. Moon, and S. H. Kim
Comparison of follicular fluid IGF-I, IGF-II, IGFBP-3, IGFBP-4 and PAPP-A concentrations and their ratios between GnRH agonist and GnRH antagonist protocols for controlled ovarian stimulation in IVF-embryo transfer patients
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2006; 21(8): 2015 - 2021.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C. R. McCartney, A. B. Bellows, M. B. Gingrich, Y. Hu, W. S. Evans, J. C. Marshall, and J. D. Veldhuis
Exaggerated 17-hydroxyprogesterone response to intravenous infusions of recombinant human LH in women with polycystic ovary syndrome
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, June 1, 2004; 286(6): E902 - E908.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
H. Al-Inany and M. Aboulghar
GnRH antagonist in assisted reproduction: a Cochrane review
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2002; 17(4): 874 - 885.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
H. Al-Innay
Subgroup analyses in Orgalutran trials
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2001; 16(12): 2726 - 2726.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
G. Ragni, W. Vegetti, E. Baroni, M. Colombo, M. Arnoldi, G. Lombroso, and P. G. Crosignani
Comparison of luteal phase profile in gonadotrophin stimulated cycles with or without a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2001; 16(11): 2258 - 2262.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.