Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (19)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tavaniotou, A.
Right arrow Articles by Devroey, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tavaniotou, A.
Right arrow Articles by Devroey, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 16, No. 4, 663-667, April 2001
© 2001 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology


Reproductive endocrinology

Comparison of LH concentrations in the early and mid-luteal phase in IVF cycles after treatment with HMG alone or in association with the GnRH antagonist Cetrorelix

Asimina Tavaniotou1, Carola Albano1, Johan Smitz1 and Paul Devroey1,2

1 Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Dutch-Speaking Free University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium

Abstract

Luteinizing hormone (LH) is mandatory for the maintenance of the corpus luteum. Ovarian stimulation for IVF has been associated with a defective luteal phase. The luteal phases of two groups of patients with normal menstrual cycles and no endocrinological cause of infertility were retrospectively analysed in IVF cycles. Thirty-one infertile patients stimulated with human menopausal gonadotrophins (HMG) for IVF to whom the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist Cetrorelix 0.25 mg was also administered to prevent the LH surge (group I) were compared with 31 infertile patients stimulated with HMG alone (group II). Despite differences in the stimulation outcome, luteal LH serum concentrations were similar in the two groups. LH values dropped from 2.3 ± 1 IU/l on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration to 1.1 ± 0.7 IU/l on day HCG +2 in group I (P < 0.0001) and from 5.1 ± 3 to 1.2 ± 1.7 IU/l (P < 0.0001) in group II. In the mid-luteal phase, LH concentrations were low in both groups. Our results suggest that suppressed LH concentrations in the early and mid-luteal phase may not be attributed solely to the GnRH-antagonist administration. Pituitary LH secretion may be inhibited by supraphysiological steroid serum concentrations via long-loop feedback and/or by the central action of the exogenously administered HCG via a short-loop mechanism.

Key words: GnRH antagonist/IVF/LH/luteal phase/ovarian stimulation

Notes

2 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: AZ-VUB, Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium. E-mail: paul.devroey{at}az.vub.ac.be or mtavaniotou{at}hotmail.com


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E.M. Kolibianakis, C.A. Venetis, E.G. Papanikolaou, K. Diedrich, B.C. Tarlatzis, and G. Griesinger
Estrogen addition to progesterone for luteal phase support in cycles stimulated with GnRH analogues and gonadotrophins for IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2008; 23(6): 1346 - 1354.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
I. E. Messinis
Ovarian feedback, mechanism of action and possible clinical implications
Hum. Reprod. Update, September 1, 2006; 12(5): 557 - 571.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
N. G M Beckers, P. Platteau, M. J Eijkemans, N. S Macklon, F. H de Jong, P. Devroey, and B. C J M Fauser
The early luteal phase administration of estrogen and progesterone does not induce premature luteolysis in normo-ovulatory women.
Eur. J. Endocrinol., August 1, 2006; 155(2): 355 - 363.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E.M. Kolibianakis, A. Schultze-Mosgau, A. Schroer, A. van Steirteghem, P. Devroey, K. Diedrich, and G. Griesinger
A lower ongoing pregnancy rate can be expected when GnRH agonist is used for triggering final oocyte maturation instead of HCG in patients undergoing IVF with GnRH antagonists
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2005; 20(10): 2887 - 2892.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.