Human Reproduction, Vol. 16, No. 5, 818-824,
May 2001
© 2001 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
Gamete donation and anonymity
The ethical and legal debate
Department of Primary Care, The University of Liverpool, The Whelan Building, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool L69 3GB, UK
The British government is currently considering whether to review the law on information provision for donor offspring. This paper therefore provides an overview of the current international legal situation relating to donor anonymity and a review of the key arguments and evidence on both sides of the debate. While the British government is considering all aspects of information giving, both identifying and non-identifying donor information, this paper will focus on the most contentious issue: the provision of information that would identify the donor. The current legal situation in the UK and internationally is examined, drawing attention to a possible international trend towards more information giving. The evolution of the present British system is outlined and it is asked whether some of the concerns and values that gave rise to the practice of anonymous donation are still relevant today. Looking at the concept of a child's right to know their biological identity it examines the possible basis of such a right and its potential conflict with the perceived interests of the child's parents. Finally, some of the practical obstacles to non-anonymous donation are evaluated. The paper concludes that a review of the British law is both timely and desirable.
Key words: anonymity/ethics/gamete donation/law
To whom correspondence should be addressed.E-mail: L.J.Frith{at}liverpool.ac.uk
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. S. Svanberg, G. Sydsjo, K. E. Selling, and C. Lampic Attitudes towards gamete donation among Swedish gynaecologists and obstetricians Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2008; 23(4): 904 - 911. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. Blyth and L. Frith The UK's gamete donor `crisis' - a critical analysis Critical Social Policy, February 1, 2008; 28(1): 74 - 95. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M K. Banu az-Zubair Who is a parent? Parenthood in Islamic ethics J. Med. Ethics, October 1, 2007; 33(10): 605 - 609. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Kirkman, D. Rosenthal, and L. Johnson Families working it out: adolescents' views on communicating about donor-assisted conception Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2007; 22(8): 2318 - 2324. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Yee, J. A. Hitkari, and E. M. Greenblatt A follow-up study of women who donated oocytes to known recipient couples for altruistic reasons Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2007; 22(7): 2040 - 2050. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. R. Wilson With friends like these: The liberalization of queer family policy Critical Social Policy, February 1, 2007; 27(1): 50 - 76. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Legge, R. Fitzgerald, and N. Frank A retrospective study of New Zealand case law involving assisted reproduction technology and the social recognition of 'new' family Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2007; 22(1): 17 - 25. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Lycett, K. Daniels, R. Curson, and S. Golombok School-aged children of donor insemination: a study of parents' disclosure patterns Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2005; 20(3): 810 - 819. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. S. Svanberg, C. Lampic, T. Bergh, and O. Lundkvist Characterization of potential oocyte donors in Sweden Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2003; 18(10): 2205 - 2215. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Nikolettos, B. Asimakopoulos, and I. Hatzissabas Intrafamilial sperm donation: ethical questions and concerns Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2003; 18(5): 933 - 936. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J.E. Scheib, M. Riordan, and S. Rubin Choosing identity-release sperm donors: the parents' perspective 13-18 years later Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2003; 18(5): 1115 - 1127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|