Human Reproduction, Vol. 16, No. 6, 1115-1119,
June 2001
© 2001 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
Uterine contractility decreases at the time of blastocyst transfers
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Endocrinology, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, Clamart, France
High-frequency uterine contractions at the time of non-cavitating embryo transfer influence adversely IVF–embryo transfer outcome. This prompted us to quantify prospectively the possible decline in uterine contraction frequency occurring during later stages of the luteal phase of ovarian stimulation, up to the time of blastocyst transfers, in 43 IVF–embryo transfer candidates. Contractility was assessed on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration, 4 days after HCG (non-cavitating embryo transfer; HCG + 4), and 7 days after HCG (blastocyst transfers; HCG + 7). For this, 2 min sagittal uterine scans were obtained by ultrasound and digitized with a computerized system for the assessment of uterine contraction frequency. Our results indicated that a slight, yet significant, decrease in uterine contraction frequency, observed from the day of HCG (4.4 ± 0.2 contractions/min) to HCG + 4 (3.5 + 0.2 contractions/min), was followed by a more pronounced, additional decrease between HCG + 4 and HCG + 7 (1.5 ± 0.2 contractions/min; P < 0.001). In conclusion, during the luteal phase of ovarian stimulation, uterine contractility decreases progressively, and reaches a nearly quiescent status 7 days after HCG administration, at the time of blastocyst transfers. It is possible that such a uterine relaxation assists blastocyst implantation.
Key words: blastocyst/embryo implantation/ultrasound/uterine contractions
1 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Endocrinology, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, 157 rue de la Porte de Trivaux, 92141, Clamart, France. E-mail: renato.fanchin{at}abc.ap-hop-paris.fr
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  F. Guerif, M. Lemseffer, R. Bidault, O. Gasnier, M.H. Saussereau, V. Cadoret, C. Jamet, and D. Royere Single Day 2 embryo versus blastocyst-stage transfer: a prospective study integrating fresh and frozen embryo transfers Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2009; 24(5): 1051 - 1058. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I.P. Kosmas, H. Tournaye, J. Van der Elst, and P. Devroey Reply: Ultrasound guided embryo transfer does not offer any benefit in clinical outcome: a randomized controlled study Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2008; 23(2): 458 - 459. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Bernabeu, M. Roca, A. Torres, and J. Ten Indomethacin effect on implantation rates in oocyte recipients Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2006; 21(2): 364 - 369. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Schwarzler, H. Zech, M. Auer, K. Pfau, G. Gobel, P. Vanderzwalmen, and N. Zech Pregnancy outcome after blastocyst transfer as compared to early cleavage stage embryo transfer Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2004; 19(9): 2097 - 2102. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M.-L. Windt, T.F. Kruger, K. Coetzee, and C.J. Lombard Comparative analysis of pregnancy rates after the transfer of early dividing embryos versus slower dividing embryos Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2004; 19(5): 1155 - 1162. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F.P. Biervliet, P. Lesny, S.D. Maguiness, and S.R. Killick Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer maximizes the IVF results on day 3 and day 4 embryo transfer but has no impact on day 5 Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2002; 17(4): 1131 - 1132. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Lesny, S. Maguiness, F. Biervliet, and S.R. Killick Uterine contractility decreases at the time of blastocyst transfer Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2002; 17(3): 841 - 841. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|