Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (23)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hapangama, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Baird, D. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hapangama, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Baird, D. T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 16, No. 6, 1145-1150, June 2001
© 2001 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Feasibility of administering mifepristone as a once a month contraceptive pill

Dharani K. Hapangama, Audrey Brown, Anna F. Glasier and David T. Baird1,

Contraceptive Development Network, Department of Reproductive and Development Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Centre for Reproductive Biology, 37 Chalmers Street, Edinburgh, EH3 9ET, UK

Many women find the idea of a once-a-month contraceptive pill an attractive concept. Mifepristone has been shown to be effective as a contraceptive if administered in the early luteal phase. We tested the contraceptive efficacy of 200 mg of mifepristone on day luteinizing hormone (LH) + 2 in a group of 32 women who used a fertility monitor to identify the LH surge. We also recruited a control group, comprising 20 women who were trying to conceive. In this group, 12 women conceived during a total of 50 control cycles (probability of pregnancy 0.25–0.32). Women in the treatment group contributed to a total of 178 cycles and there were two pregnancies (probability of pregnancy 0.01). An LH surge was not detected in 34 cycles (19.1%). In 20 cycles (11.2%) this was due to imperfect use while 14 were monitor method failures (7.9%). Treatment with mifepristone in the early luteal phase did not disrupt the cycle length but women reported slight vaginal bleeding in 15% of the cycles. The combination of a home-use fertility monitor with once-a-month administration of mifepristone (especially if mifepristone is administered at the early luteal phase) is an acceptable contraceptive option with minimal side effects. Unfortunately, it is difficult to envisage how an easier way of defining the correct timing, which required less compliance, could be devised.

Key words: contraceptive/home use fertility monitor/LH surge/Mifepristone/once-a-month pill

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: The University of Edinburgh, Centre of Reproductive Biology, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK. E-mail: dtbaird{at}ed.ac.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
N. Chabbert-Buffet, G. Meduri, P. Bouchard, and I. M. Spitz
Selective progesterone receptor modulators and progesterone antagonists: mechanisms of action and clinical applications
Hum. Reprod. Update, May 1, 2005; 11(3): 293 - 307.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
H.Z. Li, X. Sun, A. Stavreus-Evers, and K. Gemzell-Danielsson
Effect of mifepristone on the expression of cytokines in the human Fallopian tube
Mol. Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2004; 10(7): 489 - 493.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
K. Gemzell-Danielsson and L. Marions
Mechanisms of action of mifepristone and levonorgestrel when used for emergency contraception
Hum. Reprod. Update, July 1, 2004; 10(4): 341 - 348.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.