Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (26)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ngai, S. W.
Right arrow Articles by Ho, P. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ngai, S. W.
Right arrow Articles by Ho, P. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 16, No. 7, 1493-1496, July 2001
© 2001 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Vaginal misoprostol as medical treatment for first trimester spontaneous miscarriage

Suk Wai Ngai,1, Yik Ming Chan, Oi Shan Tang and Pak Chung Ho

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong SAR, China

BACKGROUND: Misoprostol is effective for cervical priming prior to suction evacuation in first trimester pregnancy termination. This is the first randomized study to compare vaginal misoprostol versus expectant treatment in women presenting with spontaneous miscarriage. METHODS: Sixty women presenting with spontaneous miscarriage were recruited to the study at the Queen Mary Hospital between 1998 and 1999. They were randomized to group 1: misoprostol; and group 2: expectant management. Women in the misoprostol group received vaginal misoprostol 400 µg on days 1, 3 and 5. The expectant group was followed up according to the same schedule. Suction evacuation was performed if there was excessive bleeding or abdominal pain; or if a gestational sac was detected by transvaginal scan on day 15. RESULTS: Fifty-nine women completed the trial. Those who did not require suction evacuation up to the time of return of normal menstruation were considered to be successful. The incidence of side-effects was comparable between the two groups. Three women in the expectant group and one in the misoprostol group underwent emergency suction evacuation because of excessive bleeding. The mean duration of vaginal bleeding was similar for both groups (14.6 days in the misoprostol group versus 15.0 days in the expectant group). The successful rate in the misoprostol group was significantly higher than that of the expectant group (83.3 versus 48.3%, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: We recommend repeated vaginal misoprostol 400 µg given on days 1, 3 and 5 as a treatment option for women with first trimester spontaneous miscarriage.

Key words: expectant management/misoprostol/randomized trial/spontaneous miscarriage

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: cora{at}hkucc.hku.hk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BMJHome page
J Trinder, P Brocklehurst, R Porter, M Read, S Vyas, and L Smith
Management of miscarriage: expectant, medical, or surgical? Results of randomised controlled trial (miscarriage treatment (MIST) trial)
BMJ, May 27, 2006; 332(7552): 1235 - 1240.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
O. S. Tang, C. Y.T. Ong, K. Y. Tse, E. H.Y. Ng, S. W.H. Lee, and P. C. Ho
A randomized trial to compare the use of sublingual misoprostol with or without an additional 1 week course for the management of first trimester silent miscarriage
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2006; 21(1): 189 - 192.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. H.S. You and T. K.H. Chung
Expectant, medical or surgical treatment for spontaneous abortion in first trimester of pregnancy: a cost analysis
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2005; 20(10): 2873 - 2878.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
B. Winikoff
Pregnancy Failure and Misoprostol -- Time for a Change
N. Engl. J. Med., August 25, 2005; 353(8): 834 - 836.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
G.C.M. Graziosi, B.W.J. Mol, P.J.H. Reuwer, A. Drogtrop, and H.W. Bruinse
Misoprostol versus curettage in women with early pregnancy failure after initial expectant management: a randomized trial
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2004; 19(8): 1894 - 1899.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J.S. Bagratee, V. Khullar, L. Regan, J. Moodley, and H. Kagoro
A randomized controlled trial comparing medical and expectant management of first trimester miscarriage
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2004; 19(2): 266 - 271.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
O. S. Tang, W. N. T. Lau, E. H. Y. Ng, S. W. H. Lee, and P. C. Ho
A prospective randomized study to compare the use of repeated doses of vaginal with sublingual misoprostol in the management of first trimester silent miscarriages
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2003; 18(1): 176 - 181.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
O. S. Tang, S. W.H. Lee, and P. C. Ho
A prospective randomized study on the measured blood loss in medical termination of early pregnancy by three different misoprostol regimens after pretreatment with mifepristone
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2002; 17(11): 2865 - 2868.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Wieringa-de Waard, J. Vos, G. J. Bonsel, P. J.E. Bindels, and W. M. Ankum
Management of miscarriage: a randomized controlled trial of expectant management versus surgical evacuation
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2002; 17(9): 2445 - 2450.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.