Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (124)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Martikainen, H.
Right arrow Articles by Hovatta, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Martikainen, H.
Right arrow Articles by Hovatta, O.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 16, No. 9, 1900-1903, September 2001
© 2001 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

One versus two embryo transfer after IVF and ICSI: a randomized study

Hannu Martikainen1,5, Aila Tiitinen4, Candido Tomás1, Juha Tapanainen1, Mauri Orava1, Leena Tuomivaara2, Sirpa Vilska3, Christel Hydén-Granskog4, Outi Hovatta3 and the Finnish ET Study Group,*

1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oulu University Central Hospital, Oulu, 2 The Family Federation of Finland, Oulu, 3 The Family Federation of Finland, Helsinki and 4 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland

BACKGROUND: The main reason for adverse treatment outcome in assisted reproduction is the high rate of multiple pregnancies. The only strategy to avoid dizygotic twins is to transfer one embryo at a time. METHODS: A total of 144 women, who had had at least four good quality embryos available after IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and who had no more than one previous failed treatment cycle, were randomized to have either one or two embryos transferred. The treatment outcomes including those after frozen embryo transfer were compared between these groups. RESULTS: The clinical pregnancy rate per transfer was 32.4% in the one embryo transfer group and 47.1% in the two embryo transfer group, the difference being not significant. Eleven twin deliveries (n = 39) occurred in the two embryo transfer group and there was one pair of monozygotic twins in the one embryo transfer group. The cumulative pregnancy rate per patient after transfer of fresh and frozen embryos was 47.3% in the one embryo transfer group and 58.6% in the two embryo transfer group. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that among women who have good quality embryos in their first IVF/ICSI, good treatment results can be achieved. They support the idea of changing embryo transfer policy towards one embryo transfer without any remarkable decrease in the success rate, while dizygotic twins can be avoided.

Key words: assisted reproductive technology/IVF/ICSI/multiple pregnancy

5 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oulu, Kajaanintie 52, 90220 Oulu, Finland. E-mail: hmartika{at}cc.oulu.fi

* The Finnish ET Study Group: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oulu, Oulu: Laure Morin-Papunen, Riitta Koivunen, Ilkka Järvelä, Jouni Lakkakorpi; The Family Federation of Finland, Oulu: Sinikka Nuojua-Huttunen, Kaisa Juntunen; The Family Federation of Finland, Helsinki: Tarja Bützow, Tuija Foudila, Tiina Hakala-Ala-Pietilä, Seija Kaukoranta, Jarna Moilanen, Sirpa Mäkinen, Rita Siegberg, Viveca Söderström-Anttila, Maija Tulppala, Timo Tuuri; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki: Mervi Halttunen, Päivi Härkki-Siren.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Bechoua, K. Astruc, S. Thouvenot, S. Girod, A. Chiron, C. Jimenez, and P. Sagot
How to demonstrate that eSET does not compromise the likelihood of having a baby?
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2009; 24(12): 3073 - 3081.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
B. Berker, C. Kaya, R. Aytac, and H. Satiroglu
Homocysteine concentrations in follicular fluid are associated with poor oocyte and embryo qualities in polycystic ovary syndrome patients undergoing assisted reproduction
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2009; 24(9): 2293 - 2302.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
P. Devroey, B.C.J.M. Fauser, K. Diedrich, and on behalf of the Evian Annual Reproduction (EVAR)
Approaches to improve the diagnosis and management of infertility
Hum. Reprod. Update, July 1, 2009; 15(4): 391 - 408.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
Z. Veleva, P. Karinen, C. Tomas, J. S. Tapanainen, and H. Martikainen
Elective single embryo transfer with cryopreservation improves the outcome and diminishes the costs of IVF/ICSI
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2009; 24(7): 1632 - 1639.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
F. Guerif, M. Lemseffer, R. Bidault, O. Gasnier, M.H. Saussereau, V. Cadoret, C. Jamet, and D. Royere
Single Day 2 embryo versus blastocyst-stage transfer: a prospective study integrating fresh and frozen embryo transfers
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2009; 24(5): 1051 - 1058.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A.M. van Peperstraten, W.L.D.M. Nelen, R.P.M.G Hermens, L. Jansen, E. Scheenjes, D.D.M. Braat, R.P.T.M. Grol, and J.A.M. Kremer
Why don't we perform elective single embryo transfer? A qualitative study among IVF patients and professionals
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2008; 23(9): 2036 - 2042.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Obstetrician and GynaecologistHome page
I. Kosmas, J. Van der Elst, P. Devroey, and H. Tournaye
Elective single embryo transfer
Obstet Gynaecol (Lond), July 1, 2008; 10(3): 163 - 169.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
The ESHRE Capri Workshop Group
Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in 2006: Evidence and Evolution
Hum. Reprod. Update, November 1, 2007; 13(6): 515 - 526.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
P.O. Karlstrom and C. Bergh
Reducing the number of embryos transferred in Sweden-impact on delivery and multiple birth rates
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2007; 22(8): 2202 - 2207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. P.A. van Montfoort, A. A.A. Fiddelers, J. A. Land, C. D. Dirksen, J. L. Severens, J. P.M. Geraedts, J. L.H. Evers, and J. C.M. Dumoulin
eSET irrespective of the availability of a good-quality embryo in the first cycle only is not effective in reducing overall twin pregnancy rates
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2007; 22(6): 1669 - 1674.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
P. Donoso, W. Verpoest, E.G. Papanikolaou, I. Liebaers, H.M. Fatemi, K. Sermon, C. Staessen, J. Van der Elst, and P. Devroey
Single embryo transfer in preimplantation genetic diagnosis cycles for women <36 years does not reduce delivery rate
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2007; 22(4): 1021 - 1025.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
A.A.A. Fiddelers, J.L. Severens, C.D. Dirksen, J.C.M. Dumoulin, J.A. Land, and J.L.H. Evers
Economic evaluations of single- versus double-embryo transfer in IVF
Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2007; 13(1): 5 - 13.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
Z. Veleva, S. Vilska, C. Hyden-Granskog, A. Tiitinen, J. S. Tapanainen, and H. Martikainen
Elective single embryo transfer in women aged 36-39 years
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2006; 21(8): 2098 - 2102.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
N. Gleicher and D. Barad
The relative myth of elective single embryo transfer
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2006; 21(6): 1337 - 1344.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
R. Tang, J. Catt, and D. Howlett
Towards defining parameters for a successful single embryo transfer in frozen cycles
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2006; 21(5): 1179 - 1183.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
D. De Neubourg and J. Gerris
What about the remaining twins since single-embryo transfer? How far can (should) we go?
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2006; 21(4): 843 - 846.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. P.A. van Montfoort, A. A.A. Fiddelers, J.M. Janssen, J. G. Derhaag, C. D. Dirksen, G. A.J. Dunselman, J. A. Land, J. P.M. Geraedts, J. L.H. Evers, and J. C.M. Dumoulin
In unselected patients, elective single embryo transfer prevents all multiples, but results in significantly lower pregnancy rates compared with double embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2006; 21(2): 338 - 343.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. T. Kjellberg, P. Carlsson, and C. Bergh
Randomized single versus double embryo transfer: obstetric and paediatric outcome and a cost-effectiveness analysis
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2006; 21(1): 210 - 216.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
B. C. Heng
Egg-sharing in return for subsidized fertility treatment: a possible solution for therapeutic cloning?
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2005; 20(11): 3258 - 3258.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
A. Pinborg
IVF/ICSI twin pregnancies: risks and prevention
Hum. Reprod. Update, November 1, 2005; 11(6): 575 - 593.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
P. Kuivasaari, M. Hippelainen, M. Anttila, and S. Heinonen
Effect of endometriosis on IVF/ICSI outcome: stage III/IV endometriosis worsens cumulative pregnancy and live-born rates
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2005; 20(11): 3130 - 3135.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
Z. Pandian, A. Templeton, G. Serour, and S. Bhattacharya
Number of embryos for transfer after IVF and ICSI: a Cochrane review
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2005; 20(10): 2681 - 2687.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. A. Collins
Associate editor's commentary: Mathematical modelling and clinical prediction
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2005; 20(10): 2932 - 2934.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
R. Matorras, F. Matorras, R. Mendoza, M. Rodriguez, J. Remohi, F. J. Rodriguez-Escudero, and C. Simon
The implantation of every embryo facilitates the chances of the remaining embryos to implant in an IVF programme: a mathematical model to predict pregnancy and multiple pregnancy rates
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2005; 20(10): 2923 - 2931.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Porter, and S. Bhattacharya
Investigation of staff and patients' opinions of a proposed trial of elective single embryo transfer
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2005; 20(9): 2523 - 2530.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Pakkila, J. Rasanen, S. Heinonen, H. Tinkanen, L. Tuomivaara, K. Makikallio, M. Hippelainen, J.S. Tapanainen, and H. Martikainen
Low-dose aspirin does not improve ovarian responsiveness or pregnancy rate in IVF and ICSI patients: a randomized, placebo-controlled double-blind study
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2005; 20(8): 2211 - 2214.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
D.M. Kissin, L.A. Schieve, and M.A. Reynolds
Multiple-birth risk associated with IVF and extended embryo culture: USA, 2001
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2005; 20(8): 2215 - 2223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J.-C. Arce, A. Nyboe Andersen, and J. Collins
Resolving methodological and clinical issues in the design of efficacy trials in assisted reproductive technologies: a mini-review
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2005; 20(7): 1757 - 1771.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Blennborn, S. Nilsson, C. Hillervik, and D. Hellberg
The couple's decision-making in IVF: one or two embryos at transfer?
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2005; 20(5): 1292 - 1297.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
G. B. Inge, P. R. Brinsden, and K. T. Elder
Oocyte number per live birth in IVF: were Steptoe and Edwards less wasteful?
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2005; 20(3): 588 - 592.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
J. M.R. Gerris
Single embryo transfer and IVF/ICSI outcome: a balanced appraisal
Hum. Reprod. Update, March 1, 2005; 11(2): 105 - 121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
H.G.M. Lukassen, D. D.Braat, A. M.M. Wetzels, G. A. Zielhuis, E. M.M. Adang, E. Scheenjes, and J. A.M. Kremer
Two cycles with single embryo transfer versus one cycle with double embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2005; 20(3): 702 - 708.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. P.A. van Montfoort, J. C.M. Dumoulin, J. A. Land, E. Coonen, J. G. Derhaag, and J. L.H. Evers
Elective single embryo transfer (eSET) policy in the first three IVF/ICSI treatment cycles
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2005; 20(2): 433 - 436.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. Bergh
Single embryo transfer: a mini-review
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2005; 20(2): 323 - 327.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
P. Saldeen and P. Sundstrom
Would legislation imposing single embryo transfer be a feasible way to reduce the rate of multiple pregnancies after IVF treatment?
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2005; 20(1): 4 - 8.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
W. Ombelet, P. De Sutter, J. Van der Elst, and G. Martens
Multiple gestation and infertility treatment: registration, reflection and reaction--the Belgian project
Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2005; 11(1): 3 - 14.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
A. Thurin, J. Hausken, T. Hillensjo, B. Jablonowska, A. Pinborg, A. Strandell, and C. Bergh
Elective Single-Embryo Transfer versus Double-Embryo Transfer in in Vitro Fertilization
N. Engl. J. Med., December 2, 2004; 351(23): 2392 - 2402.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Tiitinen, C. Hyden-Granskog, and M. Gissler
What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction?: The value of cryopreservation on cumulative pregnancy rates per single oocyte retrieval should not be forgotten
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2004; 19(11): 2439 - 2441.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Bhattacharya and A. Templeton
What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction?: Redefining success in the context of elective single embryo transfer: evidence, intuition and financial reality
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2004; 19(9): 1939 - 1942.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
U.B. Wennerholm and C. Bergh
What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction?: Singleton live births should also include preterm births
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2004; 19(9): 1943 - 1945.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. P.A. Van Montfoort, J. C.M. Dumoulin, A. D.M. Kester, and J. L.H. Evers
Early cleavage is a valuable addition to existing embryo selection parameters: a study using single embryo transfers
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2004; 19(9): 2103 - 2108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
H. Martikainen, M. Orava, J. Lakkakorpi, and L. Tuomivaara
Day 2 elective single embryo transfer in clinical practice: better outcome in ICSI cycles
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2004; 19(6): 1364 - 1366.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. A. Land and J. L.H. Evers
What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction?: Defining outcome in ART: a Gordian knot of safety, efficacy and quality
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2004; 19(5): 1046 - 1048.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
W. Buckett and S. L. Tan
What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction?: The importance of informed choice
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2004; 19(5): 1043 - 1045.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Murray, A. Shetty, A. Rattray, V. Taylor, and S. Bhattacharya
A randomized comparison of alternative methods of information provision on the acceptability of elective single embryo transfer
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2004; 19(4): 911 - 916.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
T. J. Child, A. M. Henderson, and S. L. Tan
The desire for multiple pregnancy in male and female infertility patients
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2004; 19(3): 558 - 561.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. K. Min, S. A. Breheny, V. MacLachlan, and D. L. Healy
What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction? The singleton, term gestation, live birth rate per cycle initiated: the BESST endpoint for assisted reproduction
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2004; 19(1): 3 - 7.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Koivurova, A.-L. Hartikainen, U. Sovio, M. Gissler, E. Hemminki, and M.-R. Jarvelin
Growth, psychomotor development and morbidity up to 3 years of age in children born after IVF
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2003; 18(11): 2328 - 2336.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
V. Soderstrom-Anttila, S. Vilska, S. Makinen, T. Foudila, and A.-M. Suikkari
Elective single embryo transfer yields good delivery rates in oocyte donation
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2003; 18(9): 1858 - 1863.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
P. Tummers, P. D. Sutter, and M. Dhont
Risk of spontaneous abortion in singleton and twin pregnancies after IVF/ICSI
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2003; 18(8): 1720 - 1723.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Vahratian, L. A. Schieve, M. A. Reynolds, and G. Jeng
Live-birth rates and multiple-birth risk of assisted reproductive technology pregnancies conceived using thawed embryos, USA 1999-2000
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2003; 18(7): 1442 - 1448.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Tiitinen, L. Unkila-Kallio, M. Halttunen, and C. Hyden-Granskog
Impact of elective single embryo transfer on the twin pregnancy rate
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2003; 18(7): 1449 - 1453.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Pinborg, A. Loft, L. Schmidt, and A. N. Andersen
Morbidity in a Danish National cohort of 472 IVF/ICSI twins, 1132 non-IVF/ICSI twins and 634 IVF/ICSI singletons: health-related and social implications for the children and their families
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2003; 18(6): 1234 - 1243.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
T. El-Toukhy, Y. Khalaf, K. Al-Darazi, F. O'Mahony, E. Wharf, A. Taylor, and P. Braude
Cryo-thawed embryos obtained from conception cycles have double the implantation and pregnancy potential of those from unsuccessful cycles
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2003; 18(6): 1313 - 1318.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Salumets, C. Hyden-Granskog, S. Makinen, A.-M. Suikkari, A. Tiitinen, and T. Tuuri
Early cleavage predicts the viability of human embryos in elective single embryo transfer procedures
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2003; 18(4): 821 - 825.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Pinborg, A. Loft, L. Schmidt, and A. N. Andersen
Attitudes of IVF/ICSI-twin mothers towards twins and single embryo transfer
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2003; 18(3): 621 - 627.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J.A. Land and J.L.H. Evers
Risks and complications in assisted reproduction techniques: Report of an ESHRE consensus meeting
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2003; 18(2): 455 - 457.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
F. P. Hohmann, N. S. Macklon, and B. C. J. M. Fauser
A Randomized Comparison of Two Ovarian Stimulation Protocols with Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH) Antagonist Cotreatment for in Vitro Fertilization Commencing Recombinant Follicle-Stimulating Hormone on Cycle Day 2 or 5 with the Standard Long GnRH Agonist Protocol
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2003; 88(1): 166 - 173.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
P. De Sutter, J. Gerris, and M. Dhont
A health-economic decision-analytic model comparing double with single embryo transfer in IVF/ICSI
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2002; 17(11): 2891 - 2896.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
D.D. Neubourg, K. Mangelschots, E. Van Royen, M. Vercruyssen, G. Ryckaert, M. Valkenburg, J. Barudy-Vasquez, and J. Gerris
Impact of patients' choice for single embryo transfer of a top quality embryo versus double embryo transfer in the first IVF/ICSI cycle
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2002; 17(10): 2621 - 2625.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. Gerris, D. De Neubourg, K. Mangelschots, E. Van Royen, M. Vercruyssen, J. Barudy-Vasquez, M. Valkenburg, and G. Ryckaert
Elective single day 3 embryo transfer halves the twinning rate without decrease in the ongoing pregnancy rate of an IVF/ICSI programme
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2002; 17(10): 2626 - 2631.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
M. Seppala, R. N. Taylor, H. Koistinen, R. Koistinen, and E. Milgrom
Glycodelin: A Major Lipocalin Protein of the Reproductive Axis with Diverse Actions in Cell Recognition and Differentiation
Endocr. Rev., August 1, 2002; 23(4): 401 - 430.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.