Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (119)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sandalinas, M.
Right arrow Articles by Munné, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sandalinas, M.
Right arrow Articles by Munné, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 16, No. 9, 1954-1958, September 2001
© 2001 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Developmental ability of chromosomally abnormal human embryos to develop to the blastocyst stage

M. Sandalinas,1, S. Sadowy, M. Alikani, G. Calderon, J. Cohen and S. Munné

Gamete and Embryo Research Laboratory, The Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Science of Saint Barnabas Medical Center, West Orange, NJ 07052, USA

BACKGROUND: A correlation between morphology, developmental competence and chromosome abnormalities is established. However, since absolute correlations are rare, embryo selection remains one of the most arduous tasks in assisted reproduction. This study was undertaken in order to determine which chromosomal abnormalities are compatible with development to the blastocyst stage. METHODS: Embryos diagnosed by preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) as chromosomally abnormal or unsuitable for transfer were cultured to day 5 or 6. Morphology and development were observed daily. After extended culture, embryos were fixed and analysed by two rounds of FISH with the same probes used for PGD. RESULTS: Some types of numerical chromosome abnormalities do not preclude full differentiation in vitro. For instance, extensive mosaicism was detected in blastocysts and trisomic embryos reached the blastocyst stage with a frequency of 37%. Interestingly, only those monosomies compatible with first trimester development (monosomy X and 21) were detected at blastocyst stage. CONCLUSION: Even though there is a strong selection against chromosomally abnormal embryos, extended culture to day 5 or 6 cannot be used as a reliable tool to select against clinically relevant chromosome abnormalities such as trisomies.

Key words: blastocyst/chromosome abnormalities/embryo development/extended culture

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mireia.sandalinas{at}embryos.net


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
K. Yamagata, R. Suetsugu, and T. Wakayama
Assessment of chromosomal integrity using a novel live-cell imaging technique in mouse embryos produced by intracytoplasmic sperm injection
Hum. Reprod., July 2, 2009; (2009) dep236v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. Staessen, W. Verpoest, P. Donoso, P. Haentjens, J. Van der Elst, I. Liebaers, and P. Devroey
Preimplantation genetic screening does not improve delivery rate in women under the age of 36 following single-embryo transfer
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2008; 23(12): 2818 - 2825.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E. Fragouli, M. Lenzi, R. Ross, M. Katz-Jaffe, W.B. Schoolcraft, and D. Wells
Comprehensive molecular cytogenetic analysis of the human blastocyst stage
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2008; 23(11): 2596 - 2608.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Obradors, E. Fernandez, M. Oliver-Bonet, M. Rius, A. de la Fuente, D. Wells, J. Benet, and J. Navarro
Birth of a healthy boy after a double factor PGD in a couple carrying a genetic disease and at risk for aneuploidy: Case Report
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2008; 23(8): 1949 - 1956.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
K. Yakin and B. Urman
What next for preimplantation genetic screening? A clinician's perspective
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2008; 23(8): 1686 - 1690.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
R. P.S. Jansen, M. C. Bowman, K. A. de Boer, D. A. Leigh, D. B. Lieberman, and S. J. McArthur
What next for preimplantation genetic screening (PGS)? Experience with blastocyst biopsy and testing for aneuploidy
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2008; 23(7): 1476 - 1478.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
P. Donoso, C. Staessen, B.C.J.M. Fauser, and P. Devroey
Current value of preimplantation genetic aneuploidy screening in IVF
Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2007; 13(1): 15 - 25.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
L. Gianaroli, M.C. Magli, A.P. Ferraretti, M. Lappi, E. Borghi, and B. Ermini
Oocyte euploidy, pronuclear zygote morphology and embryo chromosomal complement
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2007; 22(1): 241 - 249.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
P. Donoso, P. Platteau, E.G. Papanikolaou, C. Staessen, A. Van Steirteghem, and P. Devroey
Does PGD for aneuploidy screening change the selection of embryos derived from testicular sperm extraction in obstructive and non-obstructive azoospermic men?
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2006; 21(9): 2390 - 2395.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Michiels, E. Van Assche, I. Liebaers, A. Van Steirteghem, and C. Staessen
The analysis of one or two blastomeres for PGD using fluorescence in-situ hybridization
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2006; 21(9): 2396 - 2402.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Delimitreva, R. Zhivkova, E. Isachenko, N. Umland, and P.L. Nayudu
Meiotic abnormalities in in vitro-matured marmoset monkey (Callithrix jacchus) oocytes: development of a non-human primate model to investigate causal factors
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2006; 21(1): 240 - 247.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E.B. Baart, E. Martini, I. van den Berg, N.S. Macklon, R-J.H. Galjaard, B.C.J.M. Fauser, and D. Van Opstal
Preimplantation genetic screening reveals a high incidence of aneuploidy and mosaicism in embryos from young women undergoing IVF
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2006; 21(1): 223 - 233.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
H. Chen, K. Qian, J. Hu, D. Liu, W. Lu, Y. Yang, D. Wang, H. Yan, S. Zhang, and G. Zhu
The derivation of two additional human embryonic stem cell lines from day 3 embryos with low morphological scores
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2005; 20(8): 2201 - 2206.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
J. M.R. Gerris
Single embryo transfer and IVF/ICSI outcome: a balanced appraisal
Hum. Reprod. Update, March 1, 2005; 11(2): 105 - 121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
D.D. Daphnis, J.D.A. Delhanty, S. Jerkovic, J. Geyer, I. Craft, and J.C. Harper
Detailed FISH analysis of day 5 human embryos reveals the mechanisms leading to mosaic aneuploidy
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2005; 20(1): 129 - 137.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. Staessen, P. Platteau, E. Van Assche, A. Michiels, H. Tournaye, M. Camus, P. Devroey, I. Liebaers, and A. Van Steirteghem
Comparison of blastocyst transfer with or without preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in couples with advanced maternal age: a prospective randomized controlled trial
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2004; 19(12): 2849 - 2858.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
P. Schwarzler, H. Zech, M. Auer, K. Pfau, G. Gobel, P. Vanderzwalmen, and N. Zech
Pregnancy outcome after blastocyst transfer as compared to early cleavage stage embryo transfer
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2004; 19(9): 2097 - 2102.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E.B. Baart, D. Van Opstal, F.J. Los, B.C.J.M. Fauser, and E. Martini
Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of two blastomeres from day 3 frozen-thawed embryos followed by analysis of the remaining embryo on day 5
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2004; 19(3): 685 - 693.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E. Coonen, J. G. Derhaag, J. C.M. Dumoulin, L. C.P. van Wissen, M. Bras, M. Janssen, J. L.H. Evers, and J. P.M. Geraedts
Anaphase lagging mainly explains chromosomal mosaicism in human preimplantation embryos
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2004; 19(2): 316 - 324.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
M.G. Katz-Jaffe, A.O. Trounson, and D.S. Cram
Mitotic errors in chromosome 21 of human preimplantation embryos are associated with non-viability
Mol. Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2004; 10(2): 143 - 147.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
F. J. Los, D. Van Opstal, and C. van den Berg
The development of cytogenetically normal, abnormal and mosaic embryos: a theoretical model
Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2004; 10(1): 79 - 94.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. G. Derhaag, E. Coonen, M. Bras, J.M. Bergers Janssen, R. Ignoul-Vanvuchelen, J. P.M. Geraedts, J. L.H. Evers, and J. C.M. Dumoulin
Chromosomally abnormal cells are not selected for the extra-embryonic compartment of the human preimplantation embryo at the blastocyst stage
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2003; 18(12): 2565 - 2574.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
P. Gamiz, C. Rubio, M. J. d. l. Santos, A. Mercader, C. Simon, J. Remohi, and A. Pellicer
The effect of pronuclear morphology on early development and chromosomal abnormalities in cleavage-stage embryos
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2003; 18(11): 2413 - 2419.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Reproductive SciencesHome page
T. Pehlivan, C. Rubio, L. Rodrigo, J. Remohi, A. Pellicer, and C. Simon
Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis by Fluorescence In Situ Hybridiation: Clinical Possibliities and Pitfalls
Reproductive Sciences, September 1, 2003; 10(6): 315 - 322.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
I. Virant-Klun, T. Tomazevic, B. Zorn, L. Bacer-Kermavner, J. Mivsek, and H. Meden-Vrtovec
Blastocyst formation--good indicator of clinical results after ICSI with testicular spermatozoa
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2003; 18(5): 1070 - 1076.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
T. Hardarson, G. Caisander, A. Sjogren, C. Hanson, L. Hamberger, and K. Lundin
A morphological and chromosomal study of blastocysts developing from morphologically suboptimal human pre-embryos compared with control blastocysts
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2003; 18(2): 399 - 407.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. Rubio, C. Simon, F. Vidal, L. Rodrigo, T. Pehlivan, J. Remohi, and A. Pellicer
Chromosomal abnormalities and embryo development in recurrent miscarriage couples
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2003; 18(1): 182 - 188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Kahraman, Y. Kumtepe, S. Sertyel, E. Donmez, M. Benkhalifa, N. Findikli, and P. Vanderzwalmen
Pronuclear morphology scoring and chromosomal status of embryos in severe male infertility
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2002; 17(12): 3193 - 3200.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Emiliani, E. Gonzalez-Merino, M. Van den Bergh, D. Delneste, Y. Englert, and M. Abramowicz
Correlation between fluorescence in-situ hybridization analyses and in-vitro development to blastocyst stage of embryos from Robertsonian translocation (13;14) carriers
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2002; 17(11): 2957 - 2962.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
N.S. Macklon, M.H.E.C. Pieters, M.A. Hassan, P.H.M. Jeucken, M.J.C. Eijkemans, and B.C.J.M. Fauser
A prospective randomized comparison of sequential versus monoculture systems for in-vitro human blastocyst development
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2002; 17(10): 2700 - 2705.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
T. Ebner, M. Moser, M. Sommergruber, C. Yaman, U. Pfleger, and G. Tews
First polar body morphology and blastocyst formation rate in ICSI patients
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2002; 17(9): 2415 - 2418.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
H. Malmgren, S. Sahlen, J. Inzunza, M. Aho, B. Rosenlund, M. Fridstrom, O. Hovatta, L. Ahrlund-Richter, M. Nordenskjold, and E. Blennow
Single cell CGH analysis reveals a high degree of mosaicism in human embryos from patients with balanced structural chromosome aberrations
Mol. Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2002; 8(5): 502 - 510.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.