Human Reproduction, Vol. 16, No. 9, 1954-1958,
September 2001
© 2001 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
Developmental ability of chromosomally abnormal human embryos to develop to the blastocyst stage
Gamete and Embryo Research Laboratory, The Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Science of Saint Barnabas Medical Center, West Orange, NJ 07052, USA
BACKGROUND: A correlation between morphology, developmental competence and chromosome abnormalities is established. However, since absolute correlations are rare, embryo selection remains one of the most arduous tasks in assisted reproduction. This study was undertaken in order to determine which chromosomal abnormalities are compatible with development to the blastocyst stage. METHODS: Embryos diagnosed by preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) as chromosomally abnormal or unsuitable for transfer were cultured to day 5 or 6. Morphology and development were observed daily. After extended culture, embryos were fixed and analysed by two rounds of FISH with the same probes used for PGD. RESULTS: Some types of numerical chromosome abnormalities do not preclude full differentiation in vitro. For instance, extensive mosaicism was detected in blastocysts and trisomic embryos reached the blastocyst stage with a frequency of 37%. Interestingly, only those monosomies compatible with first trimester development (monosomy X and 21) were detected at blastocyst stage. CONCLUSION: Even though there is a strong selection against chromosomally abnormal embryos, extended culture to day 5 or 6 cannot be used as a reliable tool to select against clinically relevant chromosome abnormalities such as trisomies.
Key words: blastocyst/chromosome abnormalities/embryo development/extended culture
1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mireia.sandalinas{at}embryos.net
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Yamagata, R. Suetsugu, and T. Wakayama Assessment of chromosomal integrity using a novel live-cell imaging technique in mouse embryos produced by intracytoplasmic sperm injection Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2009; 24(10): 2490 - 2499. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Staessen, W. Verpoest, P. Donoso, P. Haentjens, J. Van der Elst, I. Liebaers, and P. Devroey Preimplantation genetic screening does not improve delivery rate in women under the age of 36 following single-embryo transfer Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2008; 23(12): 2818 - 2825. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Fragouli, M. Lenzi, R. Ross, M. Katz-Jaffe, W.B. Schoolcraft, and D. Wells Comprehensive molecular cytogenetic analysis of the human blastocyst stage Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2008; 23(11): 2596 - 2608. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Obradors, E. Fernandez, M. Oliver-Bonet, M. Rius, A. de la Fuente, D. Wells, J. Benet, and J. Navarro Birth of a healthy boy after a double factor PGD in a couple carrying a genetic disease and at risk for aneuploidy: Case Report Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2008; 23(8): 1949 - 1956. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Yakin and B. Urman What next for preimplantation genetic screening? A clinician's perspective Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2008; 23(8): 1686 - 1690. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. P.S. Jansen, M. C. Bowman, K. A. de Boer, D. A. Leigh, D. B. Lieberman, and S. J. McArthur What next for preimplantation genetic screening (PGS)? Experience with blastocyst biopsy and testing for aneuploidy Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2008; 23(7): 1476 - 1478. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Donoso, C. Staessen, B.C.J.M. Fauser, and P. Devroey Current value of preimplantation genetic aneuploidy screening in IVF Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2007; 13(1): 15 - 25. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Gianaroli, M.C. Magli, A.P. Ferraretti, M. Lappi, E. Borghi, and B. Ermini Oocyte euploidy, pronuclear zygote morphology and embryo chromosomal complement Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2007; 22(1): 241 - 249. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Donoso, P. Platteau, E.G. Papanikolaou, C. Staessen, A. Van Steirteghem, and P. Devroey Does PGD for aneuploidy screening change the selection of embryos derived from testicular sperm extraction in obstructive and non-obstructive azoospermic men? Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2006; 21(9): 2390 - 2395. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Michiels, E. Van Assche, I. Liebaers, A. Van Steirteghem, and C. Staessen The analysis of one or two blastomeres for PGD using fluorescence in-situ hybridization Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2006; 21(9): 2396 - 2402. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Delimitreva, R. Zhivkova, E. Isachenko, N. Umland, and P.L. Nayudu Meiotic abnormalities in in vitro-matured marmoset monkey (Callithrix jacchus) oocytes: development of a non-human primate model to investigate causal factors Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2006; 21(1): 240 - 247. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E.B. Baart, E. Martini, I. van den Berg, N.S. Macklon, R-J.H. Galjaard, B.C.J.M. Fauser, and D. Van Opstal Preimplantation genetic screening reveals a high incidence of aneuploidy and mosaicism in embryos from young women undergoing IVF Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2006; 21(1): 223 - 233. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Chen, K. Qian, J. Hu, D. Liu, W. Lu, Y. Yang, D. Wang, H. Yan, S. Zhang, and G. Zhu The derivation of two additional human embryonic stem cell lines from day 3 embryos with low morphological scores Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2005; 20(8): 2201 - 2206. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M.R. Gerris Single embryo transfer and IVF/ICSI outcome: a balanced appraisal Hum. Reprod. Update, March 1, 2005; 11(2): 105 - 121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D.D. Daphnis, J.D.A. Delhanty, S. Jerkovic, J. Geyer, I. Craft, and J.C. Harper Detailed FISH analysis of day 5 human embryos reveals the mechanisms leading to mosaic aneuploidy Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2005; 20(1): 129 - 137. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Staessen, P. Platteau, E. Van Assche, A. Michiels, H. Tournaye, M. Camus, P. Devroey, I. Liebaers, and A. Van Steirteghem Comparison of blastocyst transfer with or without preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in couples with advanced maternal age: a prospective randomized controlled trial Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2004; 19(12): 2849 - 2858. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Schwarzler, H. Zech, M. Auer, K. Pfau, G. Gobel, P. Vanderzwalmen, and N. Zech Pregnancy outcome after blastocyst transfer as compared to early cleavage stage embryo transfer Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2004; 19(9): 2097 - 2102. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E.B. Baart, D. Van Opstal, F.J. Los, B.C.J.M. Fauser, and E. Martini Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of two blastomeres from day 3 frozen-thawed embryos followed by analysis of the remaining embryo on day 5 Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2004; 19(3): 685 - 693. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Coonen, J. G. Derhaag, J. C.M. Dumoulin, L. C.P. van Wissen, M. Bras, M. Janssen, J. L.H. Evers, and J. P.M. Geraedts Anaphase lagging mainly explains chromosomal mosaicism in human preimplantation embryos Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2004; 19(2): 316 - 324. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.G. Katz-Jaffe, A.O. Trounson, and D.S. Cram Mitotic errors in chromosome 21 of human preimplantation embryos are associated with non-viability Mol. Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2004; 10(2): 143 - 147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. J. Los, D. Van Opstal, and C. van den Berg The development of cytogenetically normal, abnormal and mosaic embryos: a theoretical model Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2004; 10(1): 79 - 94. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. G. Derhaag, E. Coonen, M. Bras, J.M. Bergers Janssen, R. Ignoul-Vanvuchelen, J. P.M. Geraedts, J. L.H. Evers, and J. C.M. Dumoulin Chromosomally abnormal cells are not selected for the extra-embryonic compartment of the human preimplantation embryo at the blastocyst stage Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2003; 18(12): 2565 - 2574. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Gamiz, C. Rubio, M. J. d. l. Santos, A. Mercader, C. Simon, J. Remohi, and A. Pellicer The effect of pronuclear morphology on early development and chromosomal abnormalities in cleavage-stage embryos Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2003; 18(11): 2413 - 2419. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Pehlivan, C. Rubio, L. Rodrigo, J. Remohi, A. Pellicer, and C. Simon Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis by Fluorescence In Situ Hybridiation: Clinical Possibliities and Pitfalls Reproductive Sciences, September 1, 2003; 10(6): 315 - 322. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Virant-Klun, T. Tomazevic, B. Zorn, L. Bacer-Kermavner, J. Mivsek, and H. Meden-Vrtovec Blastocyst formation--good indicator of clinical results after ICSI with testicular spermatozoa Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2003; 18(5): 1070 - 1076. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Hardarson, G. Caisander, A. Sjogren, C. Hanson, L. Hamberger, and K. Lundin A morphological and chromosomal study of blastocysts developing from morphologically suboptimal human pre-embryos compared with control blastocysts Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2003; 18(2): 399 - 407. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Rubio, C. Simon, F. Vidal, L. Rodrigo, T. Pehlivan, J. Remohi, and A. Pellicer Chromosomal abnormalities and embryo development in recurrent miscarriage couples Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2003; 18(1): 182 - 188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kahraman, Y. Kumtepe, S. Sertyel, E. Donmez, M. Benkhalifa, N. Findikli, and P. Vanderzwalmen Pronuclear morphology scoring and chromosomal status of embryos in severe male infertility Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2002; 17(12): 3193 - 3200. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Emiliani, E. Gonzalez-Merino, M. Van den Bergh, D. Delneste, Y. Englert, and M. Abramowicz Correlation between fluorescence in-situ hybridization analyses and in-vitro development to blastocyst stage of embryos from Robertsonian translocation (13;14) carriers Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2002; 17(11): 2957 - 2962. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N.S. Macklon, M.H.E.C. Pieters, M.A. Hassan, P.H.M. Jeucken, M.J.C. Eijkemans, and B.C.J.M. Fauser A prospective randomized comparison of sequential versus monoculture systems for in-vitro human blastocyst development Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2002; 17(10): 2700 - 2705. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Ebner, M. Moser, M. Sommergruber, C. Yaman, U. Pfleger, and G. Tews First polar body morphology and blastocyst formation rate in ICSI patients Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2002; 17(9): 2415 - 2418. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Malmgren, S. Sahlen, J. Inzunza, M. Aho, B. Rosenlund, M. Fridstrom, O. Hovatta, L. Ahrlund-Richter, M. Nordenskjold, and E. Blennow Single cell CGH analysis reveals a high degree of mosaicism in human embryos from patients with balanced structural chromosome aberrations Mol. Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2002; 8(5): 502 - 510. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



