Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (31)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peterlin, B.
Right arrow Articles by Zorn, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Peterlin, B.
Right arrow Articles by Zorn, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 17, No. 1, 17-24, January 2002
© 2002 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Screening for Y chromosome microdeletions in 226 Slovenian subfertile men

B. Peterlin1,4, T. Kunej1, J. Sinkovec2, N. Gligorievska1 and B. Zorn3

1 Division of Medical Genetics, 2 Department of Pathology and 3 Andrology Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Centre, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to estimate the frequency of Y chromosome microdeletions in the Slovenian population of infertile men and to analyse the consequences of mutation in respect to clinical severity and prognosis. METHODS: In a controlled clinical study at the university-based medical genetics service and infertility clinic, 226 infertile men undergoing ICSI were tested. The main outcome measures included polymerase chain reaction amplification of 16 genes and gene families and 42 sequence-tagged sites in the non-recombining region of the Y chromosome, semen, testicular volume and testicular histological analysis, serum FSH concentrations, fertilization and respective pregnancy rates. RESULTS: The incidence of deletions was 4.4%: 8.6% in men with azoospermia and 1.5% in men with oligoasthenoteratozoospermia. Isolated gene deletions were not identified. No statistically significant differences in clinical outcome measures were found in patients with mutations versus patients without mutations. High fertilization (49%) and pregnancy (43%) rates with sperm of patients with Y chromosome deletions were obtained. CONCLUSIONS: Testing for gene-specific microdeletions does not contribute significantly to the sensitivity of microdeletion test. Fertilization and pregnancy rates obtained using sperm of patients with Y chromosome deletions were comparable with those achieved in conventional IVF.

Key words: azoospermia/ICSI/male infertility/oligozoospermia/Y chromosome microdeletions

4 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: borut.peterlin{at}guest.arnes.si


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J AndrolHome page
S. G. Martinez-Garza, M. C. Gallegos-Rivas, M. Vargas-Maciel, J. M. Rubio-Rubio, M. E. de los Monteros-Rodriguez, C. Gonzalez-Ortega, P. Cancino-Villarreal, L. G. V. de Lara, and A. M. Gutierrez-Gutierrez
Genetic Screening in Infertile Mexican Men: Chromosomal Abnormalities, Y Chromosome Deletions, and Androgen Receptor CAG Repeat Length
J Androl, November 1, 2008; 29(6): 654 - 660.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
R. Radpour, M. Rezaee, A. Tavasoly, S. Solati, and A. Saleki
Association of Long Polyglycine Tracts (GGN Repeats) in Exon 1 of the Androgen Receptor Gene With Cryptorchidism and Penile Hypospadias in Iranian Patients
J Androl, January 1, 2007; 28(1): 164 - 169.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
K. Writzl, B. Zorn, and B. Peterlin
Preliminary analysis of AZFb region duplication by quantitative real-time PCR
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2006; 21(3): 753 - 754.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.