Human Reproduction, Vol. 17, No. 10, 2769-2775,
October 2002
© 2002 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
Death and conception
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Fertility & Reproductive Medicine Laboratories, Royal Free & University College Medical School, London, UK
The complex moral, ethical and legal concerns that have arisen as a result of posthumous assisted reproduction (PAR) are examined in this report. Difficult questions such as what constitutes informed consent, and whether it is ethical to retrieve spermatozoa from patients who are in a coma, are considered. Legal issues, such as whether gametes can be considered as property and the need to clarify the legal definition of paternity in cases of children born in such circumstances, are also discussed, while other points regarding the advisability of PAR, respecting the wishes of the deceased donor and the need to protect the interests of the unborn child, are outlined. The motives of the gestating women, viewing their desire for PAR perhaps as part of the grieving process, and the effects on the children concerned are examined; it is concluded that there appears to be no adverse effect, but this finding might be premature. The report also asserts the need for responsible accounting on the part of fertility clinics, and calls for fairness, transparency and patience to help the bereaved reach an unbiased yet informed decision. This may be achieved by offering ample time for informed and support counselling. Finally, consideration should be expressed for the welfare of unborn child, in a balanced, pragmatic and sensible manner.
Key words: conception/consent/death/gamete cryopreservation/posthumous insemination
1 Address for correspondence: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Fertility & Reproductive Medicine Laboratories, Royal Free & University College Medical School, 25 Grafton Way, London WC1E 6DB, UK. E-mail: g.bahadur{at}ucl.ac.uk
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  B. Weber, R. Kodama, and K. Jarvi Postmortem Sperm Retrieval: The Canadian Perspective J Androl, July 1, 2009; 30(4): 407 - 409. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Braun and L. Baider Souvenir Children: Death and Rebirth J. Clin. Oncol., December 1, 2007; 25(34): 5525 - 5527. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Shefi, G. Raviv, M. L. Eisenberg, R. Weissenberg, L. Jalalian, J. Levron, G. Band, P. J. Turek, and I. Madgar Posthumous sperm retrieval: analysis of time interval to harvest sperm Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2006; 21(11): 2890 - 2893. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Dostal, R. Utrata, S. Loyka, J. Brezinova, M. Svobodova, and F. Shenfield Post-mortem sperm retrieval in new European Union countries: Case report Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2005; 20(8): 2359 - 2361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Bahadur Ethics of testicular stem cell medicine Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2004; 19(12): 2702 - 2710. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Landau Posthumous sperm retrieval for the purpose of later insemination or IVF in Israel: an ethical and psychosocial critique Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2004; 19(9): 1952 - 1956. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|