Human Reproduction, Vol. 17, No. 11, 2783-2786,
November 2002
© 2002 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
Debate continued |
Epigenetic risks related to assisted reproductive technologies
Short- and long-term consequences for the health of children conceived through assisted reproduction technology: more reason for caution?
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
Does the manipulation of gametes and embryos as practised in human IVF invoke perturbations in fetal and neonatal phenotype? There is increasing evidence that the answer is yes, although the degree of perturbation may be less acute than observed in other species. However, the long-term consequences are not known, and may prove to be considerable. There is now a substantial body of evidence from animal models suggesting that assisted reproductive technologies (ART) are associated with altered outcomes in fetal and neonatal development. Epigenetic modification of gene expression is an attractive hypothesis that accounts for these differences and is one of a number of causal pathways that may be activated by cellular stress invoked during manipulation. Here we widen the debate to propose that environment-induced cellular stress also acts to modify fetal and placental gene expression, potentially also contributing to phenotype skewing after ART.
Key words: embryo culture/epigenetic/fetal development/gene expression/placenta
1 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Reproductive Medicine Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Adelaide, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville Road, Woodville, South Australia, 5011. E-mail: jeremy.thompson{at}adelaide.edu.au
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Y. Chin, A. M. Macpherson, J. G. Thompson, M. Lane, and S. A. Robertson Stress response genes are suppressed in mouse preimplantation embryos by granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2009; 24(12): 2997 - 3009. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X.L. Jin, V. Chandrakanthan, H.D. Morgan, and C. O'Neill Preimplantation Embryo Development in the Mouse Requires the Latency of TRP53 Expression, Which Is Induced by a Ligand-Activated PI3 Kinase/AKT/MDM2-Mediated Signaling Pathway (Reprinted with Correction) Biol Reprod, July 1, 2009; 81(1): 233 - 242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Robertson, L. R. Guerin, J. J. Bromfield, K. M. Branson, A. C. Ahlstrom, and A. S. Care Seminal Fluid Drives Expansion of the CD4+CD25+ T Regulatory Cell Pool and Induces Tolerance to Paternal Alloantigens in Mice Biol Reprod, May 1, 2009; 80(5): 1036 - 1045. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. D. Sakka, A. Malamitsi-Puchner, D. Loutradis, G. P. Chrousos, and C. Kanaka-Gantenbein Euthyroid Hyperthyrotropinemia in Children Born after in Vitro Fertilization J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2009; 94(4): 1338 - 1341. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X.L. Jin, V. Chandrakanthan, H.D. Morgan, and C. O'Neill Preimplantation Embryo Development in the Mouse Requires the Latency of TRP53 Expression, Which Is Induced by a Ligand-Activated PI3 Kinase/AKT/MDM2-Mediated Signaling Pathway Biol Reprod, February 1, 2009; 80(2): 286 - 294. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Adjaye, R. Herwig, T. C. Brink, D. Herrmann, B. Greber, S. Sudheer, D. Groth, J. W. Carnwath, H. Lehrach, and H. Niemann Conserved molecular portraits of bovine and human blastocysts as a consequence of the transition from maternal to embryonic control of gene expression Physiol Genomics, October 19, 2007; 31(2): 315 - 327. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Nikolettos, B. Asimakopoulos, and I. S. Papastefanou Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection-An Assisted Reproduction Technique That Should Make Us Cautious About Imprinting Deregulation Reproductive Sciences, July 1, 2006; 13(5): 317 - 328. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. P. Fleming, W. Y. Kwong, R. Porter, E. Ursell, I. Fesenko, A. Wilkins, D. J. Miller, A. J. Watkins, and J. J. Eckert The Embryo and Its Future Biol Reprod, October 1, 2004; 71(4): 1046 - 1054. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Lucifero, J.R. Chaillet, and J. M. Trasler Potential significance of genomic imprinting defects for reproduction and assisted reproductive technology Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2004; 10(1): 3 - 18. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Geuns, M. De Rycke, A. Van Steirteghem, and I. Liebaers Methylation imprints of the imprint control region of the SNRPN-gene in human gametes and preimplantation embryos Hum. Mol. Genet., November 15, 2003; 12(22): 2873 - 2879. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. D. Lambert Safety issues in assisted reproductive technology: Aetiology of health problems in singleton ART babies Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2003; 18(10): 1987 - 1991. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D.J. Kennaway, T.J. Varcoe, and V.J. Mau Rhythmic expression of clock and clock-controlled genes in the rat oviduct Mol. Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2003; 9(9): 503 - 507. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||







