Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Child, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Tan, S. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Child, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Tan, S. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 17, No. 12, 3110-3113, December 2002
© 2002 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Endometrial volume and thickness measurements predict pituitary suppression and non-suppression during IVF

Tim J. Child1, Camille Sylvestre and Seang Lin Tan

McGill Reproductive Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Royal Victoria Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 1A1, Canada

BACKGROUND: The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the usefulness of three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound measurement of endometrial volume and thickness as a predictor of pituitary suppression and non-suppression following GnRH agonist administration for IVF. METHODS: A total of 144 women undergoing 164 IVF cycles had transvaginal ultrasound measurement of their endometrial volume and thickness following 8–14 days of buserelin acetate administration. Serum estradiol concentrations were measured on the same day. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used for statistics. A ROC curve was produced for each of four estradiol thresholds commonly used by clinics to diagnose pituitary suppression (100, 150, 200, 250 pmol/l). From each curve, endometrial volume and thickness thresholds that best predicted pituitary suppression and, separately, non-suppression were selected and the associated sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were reported. RESULTS: The area under the curve (AUC) was consistently higher (better test) for 3D volume than thickness estimation for all four estradiol thresholds, although it was only significantly different when a threshold of 200 pmol/l was used. The AUC increased towards 1.0 (perfect test) for both volume and thickness measurement as the selected estradiol threshold increased. Very different volume and thickness thresholds were optimal depending on whether the aim of the test was to predict pituitary suppression or non-suppression. CONCLUSIONS: 3D endometrial volume estimation provides a new tool, alongside endometrial thickness measurement, to diagnose pituitary suppression and non-suppression during IVF. Different endometrial thresholds must be selected depending upon whether the priority is to identify pituitary suppressed, or arguably more importantly, non-suppressed cycles.

Key words: endometrial thickness/endometrial volume/pituitary suppression/serum estradiol/3D-ultrasound

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Oxford Fertility Unit, Level 4, Women's Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK. E-mail: Timothychild{at}yahoo.com


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
F. De Castro, F. J. Moron, L. Montoro, J. J. Galan, L. M. Real, and A. Ruiz
Re: Polymorphisms Associated With Circulating Sex Hormone Levels in Postmenopausal Women
J Natl Cancer Inst, January 19, 2005; 97(2): 152 - 153.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.