Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (53)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Duran, E.H.
Right arrow Articles by Oehninger, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Duran, E.H.
Right arrow Articles by Oehninger, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 17, No. 12, 3122-3128, December 2002
© 2002 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Sperm DNA quality predicts intrauterine insemination outcome: a prospective cohort study

E.H. Duran, M. Morshedi, S. Taylor and S. Oehninger1

The Jones Institute for Reproductive Medicine, Eastern Virginia Medical School, 601 Colley Avenue, Norfolk, VA 23507-1627, USA

BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate whether sperm DNA quality may predict intrauterine insemination (IUI) outcome. METHODS: The study was designed in a prospective cohort fashion, at a tertiary centre for reproductive medicine. A total of 119 patients underwent 154 cycles of IUI. Parameters related to demography, cycle management and semen sample used for IUI were evaluated. Conventional semen parameters, morphology (strict criteria), sperm DNA fragmentation and stability [evaluated by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUDP nick-end labelling (TUNEL) and acridine orange staining under both acid and acid + heat denaturing conditions respectively] were measured. The main outcome measure was clinical pregnancy, defined as ultrasonographic visualization of intrauterine gestational sac(s). RESULTS: Logistic regression analyses were done on six sets of data, including all cycles combined, cycles with washed samples, first cycle of each couple, first cycle of each couple with washed samples, cycles stimulated with gonadotrophins and finally gonadotrophin-stimulated cycles with washed samples. The number of pre-ovulatory follicles on day of hCG, the age of the woman and the percentage of sperm with acid- + heat-resistant DNA were the parameters that predicted IUI outcome in most of these data subsets. For the gonadotrophin-stimulated cycles, age of the man appeared as a predictor as opposed to that of the woman; and for the cycles within this subgroup, where the semen sample was washed, sperm DNA fragmentation and age of the man were the only two parameters to predict IUI outcome. No samples with >12% of sperm having DNA fragmentation resulted in pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: The number of follicles, age of the woman/man and sperm DNA quality may predict IUI outcome.

Key words: acridine orange/DNA fragmentation/DNA stability/intrauterine insemination/sperm

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: oehninsc{at}evms.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J AndrolHome page
J. D. Meeker, N. P. Singh, and R. Hauser
Serum Concentrations of Estradiol and Free T4 Are Inversely Correlated With Sperm DNA Damage in Men From an Infertility Clinic
J Androl, July 1, 2008; 29(4): 379 - 388.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. D. Meeker, D. B. Barr, and R. Hauser
Human semen quality and sperm DNA damage in relation to urinary metabolites of pyrethroid insecticides
Hum. Reprod., June 25, 2008; (2008) den242v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
S. E. M. Lewis and I. M. Agbaje
Using the alkaline comet assay in prognostic tests for male infertility and assisted reproductive technology outcomes
Mutagenesis, May 1, 2008; 23(3): 163 - 170.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. G. Alvarez and S. Lewis
Sperm chromatin structure assay parameters measured after density gradient centrifugation are not predictive of the outcome of ART
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2008; 23(5): 1235 - 1236.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Bungum, M. Spano, P. Humaidan, P. Eleuteri, M. Rescia, and A. Giwercman
Sperm chromatin structure assay parameters measured after density gradient centrifugation are not predictive for the outcome of ART
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2008; 23(1): 4 - 10.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. A.H.A. Derijck, G. W. van der Heijden, L. Ramos, M. Giele, J. A.M. Kremer, and P. de Boer
Motile human normozoospermic and oligozoospermic semen samples show a difference in double-strand DNA break incidence
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2007; 22(9): 2368 - 2376.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
R. Hauser, J.D. Meeker, N.P. Singh, M.J. Silva, L. Ryan, S. Duty, and A.M. Calafat
DNA damage in human sperm is related to urinary levels of phthalate monoester and oxidative metabolites
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2007; 22(3): 688 - 695.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
L. Muriel, V. Goyanes, E. Segrelles, J. Gosalvez, J. G. Alvarez, and J. L. Fernandez
Increased Aneuploidy Rate in Sperm With Fragmented DNA as Determined by the Sperm Chromatin Dispersion (SCD) Test and FISH Analysis
J Androl, January 1, 2007; 28(1): 38 - 49.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Borini, N. Tarozzi, D. Bizzaro, M.A. Bonu, L. Fava, C. Flamigni, and G. Coticchio
Sperm DNA fragmentation: paternal effect on early post-implantation embryo development in ART
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2006; 21(11): 2876 - 2881.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. Erenpreiss, M. Bungum, M. Spano, S. Elzanaty, J. Orbidans, and A. Giwercman
Intra-individual variation in sperm chromatin structure assay parameters in men from infertile couples: clinical implications
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2006; 21(8): 2061 - 2064.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
D. Evenson
Reply to: 'The predictive value of the sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA)'--a response from the SCSA inventor.
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2006; 21(2): 570 - 572.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Bungum, L. Bungum, and P. Humaidan
A prospective study, using sibling oocytes, examining the effect of 30 seconds versus 90 minutes gamete co-incubation in IVF
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2006; 21(2): 518 - 523.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Sergerie, G. Laforest, L. Bujan, F. Bissonnette, and G. Bleau
Sperm DNA fragmentation: threshold value in male fertility
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2005; 20(12): 3446 - 3451.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Reproductive SciencesHome page
S. Oehninger
Strategies for Fertility Preservation in Female and Male Cancer Survivors
Reproductive Sciences, May 1, 2005; 12(4): 222 - 231.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
S.L. Taylor, S.L. Weng, P. Fox, E.H. Duran, M.S. Morshedi, S. Oehninger, and S.J. Beebe
Somatic cell apoptosis markers and pathways in human ejaculated sperm: potential utility as indicators of sperm quality
Mol. Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2004; 10(11): 825 - 834.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Bungum, P. Humaidan, M. Spano, K. Jepson, L. Bungum, and A. Giwercman
The predictive value of sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA) parameters for the outcome of intrauterine insemination, IVF and ICSI
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2004; 19(6): 1401 - 1408.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.