Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (24)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Whitehead, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Lacey, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Whitehead, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Lacey, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 17, No. 3, 589-594, March 2002
© 2002 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Acute and chronic effects of genistein, tyrphostin and lavendustin A on steroid synthesis in luteinized human granulosa cells

Saffron A. Whitehead,1, Julia E. Cross, Clare Burden and Michael Lacey

Department of Physiology, St George's Hospital Medical School, Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 0RE, UK

BACKGROUND: Phytoestrogens, including genistein and other inhibitors of tyrosine kinases (TKs), inhibit specific steroidogenic enzymes. This study was designed to compare the effects of genistein, with two other TK inhibitors, on steroid synthesis in human granulosa luteal (GL) cells and to identify which steroidogenic enzymes they may affect. METHODS: GL cells, obtained from women undergoing IVF procedures, were cultured for various periods of time with and without substrates for progesterone and estradiol synthesis, in the presence or absence of the TK inhibitors. RESULTS: The TK inhibitors significantly suppressed progesterone and estradiol synthesis in a dose-dependent manner over a 48 h culture period. Progesterone production in the presence of 10-7 mol/l pregnenolone during a 4 h period was inhibited by both acute (4 h) and chronic (24 h) exposure of GL cells to 50 µmol/l genistein (P < 0.05) whilst no significant effects of 50 µmol/l tyrphostin A23 were observed. Genistein (4 and 24 h exposure) inhibited the production of estradiol using 10-7 mol/l estrone as a substrate, but inhibition of estradiol synthesis using androstenedione or testosterone as substrates was only observed after a 24 h exposure. In contrast, tyrphostin acutely stimulated estradiol synthesis when androstenedione and testosterone were used as substrates (P < 0.05) but not estrone. CONCLUSIONS: Genistein directly inhibits 3 and 17ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase activity, whilst tyrphostin has an acute stimulatory effect on aromatase activity. Over a longer time (24 and/or 48 h period), both TK inhibitors suppress steroid synthesis.

Key words: estradiol/genistein/human granulosa luteal cells/progesterone/tyrphostin

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: s.whitehead{at}sghms.ac.uk

Submitted on July 20, 2001


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Nutr.Home page
B. L. Dillingham, B. L. McVeigh, J. W. Lampe, and A. M. Duncan
Soy Protein Isolates of Varying Isoflavone Content Exert Minor Effects on Serum Reproductive Hormones in Healthy Young Men
J. Nutr., March 1, 2005; 135(3): 584 - 591.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
S.A. Whitehead and M. Lacey
Phytoestrogens inhibit aromatase but not 17{beta}-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (HSD) type 1 in human granulosa-luteal cells: evidence for FSH induction of 17{beta}-HSD
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2003; 18(3): 487 - 494.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.