Human Reproduction, Vol. 17, No. 3, 654-658,
March 2002
© 2002 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
Pilot study on the use of repeated doses of sublingual misoprostol in termination of pregnancy up to 12 weeks gestation: efficacy and acceptability
1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China
BACKGROUND: A sublingual misoprostol-alone regimen was used in 50 women requesting medical abortion at up to 12 weeks gestation. The efficacy and acceptability of this regimen were studied. METHODS: The women were given 600 µg misoprostol sublingually every 3 h for a maximum of 5 doses. RESULTS: The overall complete abortion rate was 86% (95% confidence interval: 7493). The mean number of doses of misoprostol required was 4.1 ± 1.1. There was no significant change in haemoglobin concentration and the median duration of vaginal bleeding was 15 days (range: 756). Diarrhoea, fever and chills were the most common side-effects. The acceptability of this regimen of misoprostol was good: 97.7% of the women who had a complete abortion would choose this method again and 88.4% would recommend it to others. They preferred sublingual misoprostol as it is convenient to take, avoids the painful vaginal administration and gives more privacy during the abortion process. CONCLUSION: This regimen of sublingual misoprostol is an effective and acceptable method of medical abortion. Randomized controlled trials are required to compare the efficacy of various misoprostol-alone regimens of medical abortion. Pharmacokinetic studies and clinical trials are needed to find out the most appropriate dose, dosing interval and route of administration of misoprostol.
Key words: medical abortion/misoprostol/sublingual
2 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: 6/F, Professorial Block, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, 102, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong SAR, China. E-mail: ostang{at}graduate.hku.hk
Submitted on May 18, 2001; resubmitted on October 9, 2001
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Hamoda, P. W. Ashok, G. M.M. Flett, and A. Templeton A randomized trial of mifepristone in combination with misoprostol administered sublingually or vaginally for medical abortion at 13-20 weeks gestation Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2005; 20(8): 2348 - 2354. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. S. Tang, K. H. Mok, and P. C. Ho A randomized study comparing the use of sublingual to vaginal misoprostol for pre-operative cervical priming prior to surgical termination of pregnancy in the first trimester Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2004; 19(5): 1101 - 1104. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Saxena, S. Salhan, and N. Sarda Comparison between the sublingual and oral route of misoprostol for pre-abortion cervical priming in first trimester abortions Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2004; 19(1): 77 - 80. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-S. Chong, S. Chua, and S. Arulkumaran Sublingual misoprostol for first trimester termination of pregnancy: safety concerns Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2002; 17(10): 2777 - 2777. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O.-S. Tang Sublingual misoprostol for first trimester termination of pregnancy: safety concerns Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2002; 17(10): 2778 - 2778. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
