Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cho, S.-I.
Right arrow Articles by Xu, X.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cho, S.-I.
Right arrow Articles by Xu, X.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 17, No. 4, 1060-1066, April 2002
© 2002 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Reliability of serial urine HCG as a biomarker to detect early pregnancy loss

S.-I. Cho1, M.B. Goldman2,9, L.M. Ryan3, C. Chen1, A.I. Damokosh1, D.C. Christiani1,4, B.L. Lasley5, J.F. O'Connor6, A.J. Wilcox7 and X. Xu1,8,10

1 Department of Environmental Health, 2 Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, 3 Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, and Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, 4 Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, 5 Institute of Toxicology and Environmental Health, University of California, Davis, CA, 6 Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, 7 Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC and 8 Channing Laboratory, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

BACKGROUND: To examine the reliability of HCG as a biomarker for early pregnancy loss, five experienced researchers independently assessed data from 153 menstrual cycles, determining whether each cycle represented `no conception,' a `continuing conception' or a `conception lost.' METHODS: Urine samples were analysed by immunoradiometric assay using a combination of capture antibodies for the intact heterodimer (B109) and for an epitope common to the beta subunit and the beta core fragment (B204). For each cycle, HCG data were presented as graphs of daily assay results. Summary statistics for HCG assays from 46 women who had undergone bilateral tubal ligation represented baseline values. RESULTS: Pairwise agreement among the assessors for any of the three options ranged from 78–89%. At least three experts agreed for 147 cycles (96%), accounting for 28 conception losses and 19 continuing conceptions. The multi-rater kappa was 0.62 for the conception lost category and 0.68 for continuing conceptions, indicating substantial agreement. CONCLUSION: The main sources of disagreement involved deciding whether there was sufficient information for assessment, interpreting cycle parameters such as cycle length or bleeding event, and interpreting a distinct HCG rise pattern that does not exceed the baseline value obtained from the sterilized women.

Key words: early pregnancy loss/human chorionic gonadotrophin/immunoradiometric assay/reliability

9 Present address: Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA and New England Research Institutes, Watertown, MA, USA

10 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Occupational Health Program, Department of Environmental Health, Harvard School of Public Health, 665 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA. E-mail: xu{at}hsph.harvard.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
N.H. Hjollund, J.P. Bonde, E. Ernst, S. Lindenberg, A.N. Andersen, and J. Olsen
Pesticide exposure in male farmers and survival of in vitro fertilized pregnancies
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2004; 19(6): 1331 - 1337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.