Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jones, K.D.
Right arrow Articles by Sutton, C.J.G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jones, K.D.
Right arrow Articles by Sutton, C.J.G.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 17, No. 4, 845-849, April 2002
© 2002 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

The ovarian endometrioma: why is it so poorly managed?

Indicators from an anonymous survey

K.D. Jones,1, A. Fan and C.J.G. Sutton

Department of Gynaecological Endoscopic Surgery, The Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, Surrey GU2 7XX, UK

As a tertiary referral centre for women with severe endometriosis we see a large number of patients who have endometriotic cysts, and many of these patients have been operated on by gynaecologists elsewhere in the UK. We have been surprised by the variety of approaches to their management. In order to establish the current clinical practices of endometrioma management amongst gynaecologists in the UK, we have carried out an anonymous survey. There appears to be an equal preference for open versus endoscopic surgery, even though there is considerable evidence suggesting that endoscopic surgery is superior. However, the management of endometriomas varies significantly between the two groups. In this article, we have presented the results of our survey and used them as the basis for a debate on the management of endometriomas.

Key words: endometrioma/management

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: 62 Stoke Road, Guildford, Surrey, GU1 4HR, UK. E-mail: kjones{at}rschguildford.freeserve.co.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
N. Hammadieh, M. Afnan, J. Evans, K. Sharif, N. Amso, and O. Olufowobi
A postal survey of hydrosalpinx management prior to IVF in the United Kingdom
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2004; 19(4): 1009 - 1012.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
M.S. Arruda, C.A. Petta, M.S. Abrao, and C.L. Benetti-Pinto
Time elapsed from onset of symptoms to diagnosis of endometriosis in a cohort study of Brazilian women
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2003; 18(4): 756 - 759.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
M. Canis, G. Mage, A. Wattiez, J.L. Pouly, and M.A. Bruhat
The ovarian endometrioma: why is it so poorly managed?: Laparoscopic treatment of large ovarian endometrioma: why such a long learning curve?
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2003; 18(1): 5 - 7.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.