Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (59)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Koivurova, S.
Right arrow Articles by Järvelin, M.-R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Koivurova, S.
Right arrow Articles by Järvelin, M.-R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 17, No. 5, 1391-1398, May 2002
© 2002 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Neonatal outcome and congenital malformations in children born after in-vitro fertilization

Sari Koivurova1,2,5, Anna-Liisa Hartikainen2, Mika Gissler3, Elina Hemminki3, Ulla Sovio4 and Marjo-Riitta Järvelin1,4

1 Department of Public Health Science and General Practice, 2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Oulu, Oulu, 3 National Research and Development Center for Welfare and Health, Helsinki, Finland and 4 Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Imperial College School of Medicine, London, UK

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the neonatal outcome and the prevalence of congenital malformations in children born after IVF in northern Finland we carried out a population-based study with matched controls. METHODS: Firstly, 304 IVF children born in 1990–1995 were compared with 569 controls, representing the general population in proportion of multiple births, randomly chosen from the Finnish Medical Birth Register (FMBR) and matched for sex, year of birth, area of residence, parity, maternal age and social class. Secondly, plurality matched controls (n = 103) for IVF twins (n =103) were randomly chosen from the FMBR and analysed separately. Additionally, IVF singletons (n = 153) were compared with singleton controls (n = 287). Mortality rates were compared with national figures from FMBR. RESULTS: Most mortality rates were twice as high as national figures in the general population. When compared with the control group representing the general population, the incidences of preterm birth [odds ratio (OR) 5.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.7–8.6], very low birth weight (OR 6.2, 95% CI 2.0–19.0), low birth weight (OR 9.8, 95% CI 5.6–17.3), neonatal morbidity (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.7–3.4) and hospitalization (OR 3.2, 95% CI 2.2–4.6) were significantly higher in the IVF group. The prevalence of heart malformations was four-fold in the IVF population than in the controls representing the general population (OR 4.0, 95% CI 1.4–11.7). CONCLUSIONS: Neonatal outcome after IVF is worse than in the general population with similar maternal age, parity and social standing, mainly due to the large proportion of multifetal births after IVF. The higher prevalence of heart malformations does not solely arise from multiplicity but from other causes. In order to improve neonatal outcome after IVF, the number of embryos transferred should be limited to a minimum.

Key words: congenital malformations/hospitalization/in-vitro fertilization/neonatal outcome

5 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Oulu, PO BOX 24, 90029 Oulu, Finland. E-mail: sari.koivurova{at}oulu.fi


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Hansen, L. Colvin, B. Petterson, J. J. Kurinczuk, N. de Klerk, and C. Bower
Twins born following assisted reproductive technology: perinatal outcome and admission to hospital
Hum. Reprod., May 20, 2009; (2009) dep173v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. L. Boulet, L. A. Schieve, A. Nannini, C. Ferre, O. Devine, B. Cohen, Z. Zhang, V. Wright, and M. Macaluso
Perinatal outcomes of twin births conceived using assisted reproduction technology: a population-based study
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2008; 23(8): 1941 - 1948.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
R. Axer-Siegel, Z. Herscovici, S. Davidson, N. Linder, I. Sherf, and M. Snir
Early Structural Status of the Eyes of Healthy Term Neonates Conceived by In Vitro Fertilization or Conceived Naturally
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., December 1, 2007; 48(12): 5454 - 5458.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
M. O. Bahtiyar and J. A. Copel
Improving Detection of Fetal Cardiac Anomalies: A Fetal Echocardiogram for Every Fetus?
J. Ultrasound Med., December 1, 2007; 26(12): 1639 - 1641.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Koivurova, A.-L. Hartikainen, M. Gissler, E. Hemminki, and M.-R. Jarvelin
Post-neonatal hospitalization and health care costs among IVF children: a 7-year follow-up study
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2007; 22(8): 2136 - 2141.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeoReviewsHome page
J. Johnson, T. Hartman, and C. E. Colby
Developmental and Genetic Outcomes in Children Conceived Through Assisted Reproductive Technologies
NeoReviews, December 1, 2006; 7(12): e615 - e626.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
V. Soderstrom-Anttila, T. Salokorpi, M. Pihlaja, S. Serenius-Sirve, and A.-M. Suikkari
Obstetric and perinatal outcome and preliminary results of development of children born after in vitro maturation of oocytes
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2006; 21(6): 1508 - 1513.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
A. Pinborg
IVF/ICSI twin pregnancies: risks and prevention
Hum. Reprod. Update, November 1, 2005; 11(6): 575 - 593.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
R. Axer-Siegel, D. Bourla, L. Sirota, D. Weinberger, and M. Snir
Ocular Growth in Premature Infants Conceived by In Vitro Fertilization versus Natural Conception
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., April 1, 2005; 46(4): 1163 - 1169.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Hansen, C. Bower, E. Milne, N. de Klerk, and J. J.Kurinczuk
Assisted reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects--a systematic review
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2005; 20(2): 328 - 338.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
P. Saldeen and P. Sundstrom
Would legislation imposing single embryo transfer be a feasible way to reduce the rate of multiple pregnancies after IVF treatment?
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2005; 20(1): 4 - 8.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Koivurova, A.-L. Hartikainen, M. Gissler, E. Hemminki, R. Klemetti, and M.-R. Jarvelin
Health care costs resulting from IVF: prenatal and neonatal periods
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2004; 19(12): 2798 - 2805.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
N. S. Green
Risks of Birth Defects and Other Adverse Outcomes Associated With Assisted Reproductive Technology
Pediatrics, July 1, 2004; 114(1): 256 - 259.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Pinborg, A. Loft, S. Rasmussen, L. Schmidt, J. Langhoff-Roos, G. Greisen, and A. Nyboe Andersen
Neonatal outcome in a Danish national cohort of 3438 IVF/ICSI and 10 362 non-IVF/ICSI twins born between 1995 and 2000
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2004; 19(2): 435 - 441.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
F. M Helmerhorst, D. A M Perquin, D. Donker, and M. J N C Keirse
Perinatal outcome of singletons and twins after assisted conception: a systematic review of controlled studies
BMJ, January 31, 2004; 328(7434): 261.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Koivurova, A.-L. Hartikainen, U. Sovio, M. Gissler, E. Hemminki, and M.-R. Jarvelin
Growth, psychomotor development and morbidity up to 3 years of age in children born after IVF
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2003; 18(11): 2328 - 2336.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
R. D. Lambert
Safety issues in assisted reproductive technology: Aetiology of health problems in singleton ART babies
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2003; 18(10): 1987 - 1991.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Tiitinen, L. Unkila-Kallio, M. Halttunen, and C. Hyden-Granskog
Impact of elective single embryo transfer on the twin pregnancy rate
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2003; 18(7): 1449 - 1453.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
R. D. Lambert
Safety issues in assisted reproduction technology: The children of assisted reproduction confront the responsible conduct of assisted reproductive technologies
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2002; 17(12): 3011 - 3015.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Koivurova, A.-L. Hartikainen, L. Karinen, M. Gissler, E. Hemminki, H. Martikainen, L. Tuomivaara, and M.-R. Jarvelin
The course of pregnancy and delivery and the use of maternal healthcare services after standard IVF in Northern Finland 1990-1995
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2002; 17(11): 2897 - 2903.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Koivurova, U. Sovio, and M.-R. Jarvelin
Neonatal outcome and congenital malformations in children born after IVF
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2002; 17(11): 3005 - 3005.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
P. Merlob and B. Fisch
Neonatal outcome and congenital malformations in children born after IVF
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2002; 17(11): 3004 - 3005.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
D. H. Barlow
The children of assisted reproduction_the need for an ongoing debate
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2002; 17(5): 1133 - 1134.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.