Human Reproduction, Vol. 17, No. 5, 1399-1403,
May 2002
© 2002 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
Changes with age in the level and duration of fertility in the menstrual cycle
1 Biostatistics Branch, MD A3-03 and 2 Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, P.O.Box 12233, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA and 3 Dipartimento di Scienze Statistiche, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
BACKGROUND: Most analyses of age-related changes in fertility cannot separate effects due to reduced frequency of sexual intercourse from effects directly related to ageing. Information on intercourse collected daily through each menstrual cycle provides the data for estimating day-specific probabilities of pregnancy for specific days relative to ovulation, and these estimates allow unconfounded analysis of ageing effects. METHODS: A total of 782 healthy couples using natural family planning methods contributed prospective data on 5860 menstrual cycles. Day of ovulation was based on basal body temperature measurements. Estimates of day-specific probabilities of pregnancy and the length of the fertile window were compared across age groups. RESULTS: Nearly all pregnancies occurred within a 6 day fertile window. There was no evidence for a shorter fertile window in older men or women. On average, the day-specific probabilities of pregnancy declined with age for women from the late 20s onward, with probabilities of pregnancy twice as high for women aged 1926 years compared with women aged 3539 years. Controlling for age of the woman, fertility was significantly reduced for men aged >35 years. CONCLUSIONS: Women's fertility begins to decline in the late 20s with substantial decreases by the late 30s. Fertility for men is less affected by age, but shows significant decline by the late 30s.
Key words: Bayesian/fertile interval/ovulation/menstrual cycle/pregnancy probabilities
4 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: dunson1{at}niehs.nih.gov
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. A. Sartorius and E. Nieschlag Paternal age and reproduction Hum. Reprod. Update, August 20, 2009; (2009) dmp027v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. French and E. T. Kus KAMA: A Temperature-Driven Model of Mate Choice Using Dynamic Partner Representations Adaptive Behavior, February 1, 2008; 16(1): 71 - 95. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G.F. Homan, M. Davies, and R. Norman The impact of lifestyle factors on reproductive performance in the general population and those undergoing infertility treatment: a review Hum. Reprod. Update, May 1, 2007; 13(3): 209 - 223. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. B. Stanford and D. B. Dunson Effects of Sexual Intercourse Patterns in Time to Pregnancy Studies Am. J. Epidemiol., May 1, 2007; 165(9): 1088 - 1095. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Buston, L. Williamson, and G. Hart Young women under 16 years with experience of sexual intercourse: who becomes pregnant? J Epidemiol Community Health, March 1, 2007; 61(3): 221 - 225. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Axmon, L. Rylander, M. Albin, and L. Hagmar Factors affecting time to pregnancy Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2006; 21(5): 1279 - 1284. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Ecochard Heterogeneity in fecundability studies: issues and modelling Statistical Methods in Medical Research, April 1, 2006; 15(2): 141 - 160. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Colombo, A. Mion, K. Passarin, and B. Scarpa Cervical mucus symptom and daily fecundability: first results from a new database Statistical Methods in Medical Research, April 1, 2006; 15(2): 161 - 180. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Zhou Statistical models for human fecundability Statistical Methods in Medical Research, April 1, 2006; 15(2): 181 - 194. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Lampic, A. S. Svanberg, P. Karlstrom, and T. Tyden Fertility awareness, intentions concerning childbearing, and attitudes towards parenthood among female and male academics Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2006; 21(2): 558 - 564. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
ESHRE Capri Workshop Group Fertility and ageing Hum. Reprod. Update, May 1, 2005; 11(3): 261 - 276. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Gnoth, E. Godehardt, P. Frank-Herrmann, K. Friol, J. Tigges, and G. Freundl Definition and prevalence of subfertility and infertility Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2005; 20(5): 1144 - 1147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Brosens, S. Gordts, M. Valkenburg, P. Puttemans, R. Campo, and S. Gordts Investigation of the infertile couple: when is the appropriate time to explore female infertility? Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2004; 19(8): 1689 - 1692. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Miro, S. W. Parker, L. J. Aspinall, J. Coley, P. W. Perry, and J. E. Ellis Relationship between Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Levels at the Beginning of the Human Menstrual Cycle, Length of the Follicular Phase and Excreted Estrogens: The FREEDOM Study J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2004; 89(7): 3270 - 3275. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Kuhnert and E. Nieschlag Reproductive functions of the ageing male Hum. Reprod. Update, July 1, 2004; 10(4): 327 - 339. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A.J. Wilcox, D. Day Baird, D. B. Dunson, D. R. McConnaughey, J. S. Kesner, and C. R. Weinberg On the frequency of intercourse around ovulation: evidence for biological influences Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2004; 19(7): 1539 - 1543. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Leridon Can assisted reproduction technology compensate for the natural decline in fertility with age? A model assessment Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2004; 19(7): 1548 - 1553. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Bigelow, D. B. Dunson, J. B. Stanford, R. Ecochard, C. Gnoth, and B. Colombo Mucus observations in the fertile window: a better predictor of conception than timing of intercourse Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2004; 19(4): 889 - 892. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Westhoff Emergency Contraception N. Engl. J. Med., November 6, 2003; 349(19): 1830 - 1835. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Gnoth, D. Godehardt, E. Godehardt, P. Frank-Herrmann, and G. Freundl Time to pregnancy: results of the German prospective study and impact on the management of infertility Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2003; 18(9): 1959 - 1966. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Taylor Extent of the problem BMJ, August 23, 2003; 327(7412): 434 - 436. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. De La Rochebrochard, K. Mcelreavey, and P. Thonneau Paternal Age Over 40 Years: The "Amber Light" in the Reproductive Life of Men? J Androl, July 1, 2003; 24(4): 459 - 465. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Mathematical Model Misrepresents Age-Related Fertility Decline Journal Watch Women's Health, July 23, 2002; 2002(723): 2 - 2. [Full Text] |
||||










