Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wieringa-de Waard, M.
Right arrow Articles by Bonsel, G. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wieringa-de Waard, M.
Right arrow Articles by Bonsel, G. J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 17, No. 6, 1638-1642, June 2002
© 2002 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Expectant management versus surgical evacuation in first trimester miscarriage: health-related quality of life in randomized and non-randomized patients

Margreet Wieringa-de Waard,1, Esther E. Hartman, Willem M. Ankum, Johannes B. Reitsma, Patrick J.E. Bindels and Gouke J. Bonsel

Academic Medical Center–University of Amsterdam, Department of General Practice/Family Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

BACKGROUND: Expectant management, although less effective, is an alternative treatment option for surgical evacuation in women with a miscarriage. We assessed health-related quality of life (HRQL) differences over time between expectant and surgical management in women with a miscarriage. METHODS: Women with a miscarriage were randomized to either expectant (n = 64) or surgical (n = 58) management, and 305 eligible women who refused randomization because of a preference for either treatment option were managed according to their choice following the same clinical protocol (126 expectant, 179 surgical). The main outcome measures were score differences of HRQL during 12 weeks. Repeated measures analysis was applied. RESULTS: Out of a total of 427 women, 198 were excluded in the questionnaire follow-up, leaving 229 women who participated. Mental health of women allocated to expectant management improved more and earlier (treatment effect) than of women allocated to surgical evacuation. Mental health scores were significantly better in women who chose, rather than women who were randomized, to curettage. The groups managed according to their own preference showed no differences in mental health scores. CONCLUSION: Women with a miscarriage who chose their own treatment had the best HRQL over time, supporting the role of free choice from a clinical point of view. Women without a treatment preference should be encouraged to start with expectant management for psychological reasons.

Key words: anxiety/grief/quality of life/randomized controlled trial/spontaneous abortion

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Academic Medical Center–University of Amsterdam, Department of General Practice/Family Medicine, Division of Public Health, PO Box 22700, 1100 DE Amsterdam, The Netherlands. E-mail: m.wieringa{at}amc.uva.nl


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 The Obstetrician and GynaecologistHome page
H. Sagili and M. Divers
Modern management of miscarriage
Obstet Gynaecol (Lond), April 1, 2007; 9(2): 102 - 108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
W. H. Tam, M. H. Y. Tsui, I. H. Lok, S.-K. Yip, P. M. Yuen, and T. K. H. Chung
Long-term reproductive outcome subsequent to medical versus surgical treatment for miscarriage
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2005; 20(12): 3355 - 3359.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.