Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thomson, A.B.
Right arrow Articles by Wallace, W.H.B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thomson, A.B.
Right arrow Articles by Wallace, W.H.B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 17, No. 7, 1715-1723, July 2002
© 2002 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Investigation of suppression of the hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal axis to restore spermatogenesis in azoospermic men treated for childhood cancer

A.B. Thomson1, R.A. Anderson2, D.S. Irvine2, C.J.H. Kelnar1, R.M. Sharpe2 and W.H.B. Wallace1,3

1 Section of Child Life and Health, Department of Reproductive and Developmental Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 1LW and 2 MRC Human Reproductive Sciences Unit, Centre for Reproductive Biology, Edinburgh EH3 9ET, UK

BACKGROUND: Does suppression of the hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal (HPG) axis restore spermatogenesis in men rendered azoospermic following treatment of childhood cancer? METHODS: Seven men with azoospermia secondary to treatment for childhood cancer, median age (range), 22.2 (18–25.3) years, aged 10.4 (4.4–13.3) years at original diagnosis, participated. Each subject underwent semen analysis and testicular biopsy, followed by treatment with medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), 300 mg i.m. repeated after 12 weeks, with 800 mg testosterone pellets s.c. on day 1 to suppress the HPG axis. Hormone and semen analysis was performed every 6 weeks for 48 weeks. A second testicular biopsy was performed at week 48. RESULTS: Before HPG axis suppression, mean ± SEM plasma LH was 9.0 ± 1.8 U/l, testosterone 17.9 ± 1.5 nmol/l and FSH 22.4 ± 4.4 U/l. Median (range) venous plasma and seminal plasma inhibin B levels were 10.0 (7.8–35) and 11.2 (7.8–770) ng/l respectively. During HPG suppression, FSH and LH levels were undetectable for >=12 weeks followed by a gradual return to pretreatment concentrations by 48 weeks. All men remained azoospermic at study completion and complete absence of germ cells on biopsies was demonstrated by immunocytochemistry for all specimens pre- and post-HPG axis suppression. CONCLUSIONS: HPG axis suppression with MPA–testosterone for >=12 weeks did not restore spermatogenesis in azoospermic men treated with gonadotoxic radiotherapy and chemotherapy for childhood cancer.

Key words: cancer/childhood/hormone suppression/spermatogenesis/testis

3 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Department of Haematology/Oncology, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, 17 Millerfield Place, Edinburgh EH9 1LW, UK. E-mail: Hamish.Wallace{at}luht.scot.nhs.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ReproductionHome page
M. L Meistrich and G. Shetty
Hormonal suppression for fertility preservation in males and females
Reproduction, December 1, 2008; 136(6): 691 - 701.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
S. J. Lee, L. R. Schover, A. H. Partridge, P. Patrizio, W. H. Wallace, K. Hagerty, L. N. Beck, L. V. Brennan, and K. Oktay
American Society of Clinical Oncology Recommendations on Fertility Preservation in Cancer Patients
J. Clin. Oncol., June 20, 2006; 24(18): 2917 - 2931.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CA Cancer J ClinHome page
B. Simon, S. J. Lee, A. H. Partridge, and C. D. Runowicz
Preserving Fertility After Cancer
CA Cancer J Clin, July 1, 2005; 55(4): 211 - 228.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Natl Cancer Inst MonogrHome page
G. Shetty and M. L. Meistrich
Hormonal Approaches to Preservation and Restoration of Male Fertility After Cancer Treatment
J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, March 1, 2005; 2005(34): 36 - 39.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
G. Shetty, C. C. Y. Weng, O. U. Bolden-Tiller, I. Huhtaniemi, D. J. Handelsman, and M. L. Meistrich
Effects of Medroxyprogesterone and Estradiol on the Recovery of Spermatogenesis in Irradiated Rats
Endocrinology, October 1, 2004; 145(10): 4461 - 4469.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
W H B Wallace and A B Thomson
Preservation of fertility in children treated for cancer
Arch. Dis. Child., June 1, 2003; 88(6): 493 - 496.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
M. L. Meistrich and G. Shetty
Inhibition of Spermatogonial Differentiation by Testosterone
J Androl, March 1, 2003; 24(2): 135 - 148.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.