Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baukloh, V
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Baukloh, V
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 17, No. 7, 1788-1794, July 2002
© 2002 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Retrospective multicentre study on mechanical and enzymatic preparation of fresh and cryopreserved testicular biopsies

V Baukloh on behalf of the German Society for Human Reproductive Biology

BACKGROUND: Isolation of sperm suitable for ICSI from fresh or frozen–thawed testicular sperm extraction (TESE) can be facilitated by mechanical or enzymatic processing of the samples. METHODS: A retrospective multicentre study was initiated to compare these two approaches. Eleven German centres provided data on their TESE cycles performed during the period 1996/1997. Quality of retrieved sperm, fertilization rates of injected oocytes, embryo quality, resulting pregnancy rates and evolution of pregnancies were evaluated. RESULTS: The percentage of cycles with at least some motile sperm available for injection was higher after mechanical preparation. Independent of the preparation method, fertilization rates were higher for motile compared with immotile sperm or elongated spermatids in all groups and in general higher for cryopreserved versus fresh samples. Embryo quality was significantly better after injection of motile sperm for all treatments and in particular after enzymatic versus mechanical processing of biopsies. Pregnancy rates were identical for embryos derived from sperm prepared mechanically or enzymatically from fresh or cryopreserved testicular samples. The abortion rate (32/172, 18.6%) and the rate of multiple implantations (32/140, 22.9%) were not different from results reported in the literature for ICSI using ejaculated sperm. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective multicentre study, no unequivocal advantage of one over the other preparation method could be identified in 839 ICSI cycles using testicular sperm from 549 patients.

Key words: embryo quality/fertilization rates/pregnancy rates/sperm preparation/testicular biopsy

To whom correspondence should be addressed: Vera Baukloh, Fertility Center Hamburg, Speersort 4, D-20095 Hamburg, Germany. E-mail: vbaukloh{at}fertility-center-hh.de


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J AndrolHome page
R. Hauser, L. Yogev, A. Amit, H. Yavetz, A. Botchan, F. Azem, J. B. Lessing, and D. Ben-Yosef
Severe Hypospermatogenesis in Cases of Nonobstructive Azoospermia: Should We Use Fresh or Frozen Testicular Spermatozoa?
J Androl, November 1, 2005; 26(6): 772 - 778.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
G. Verheyen, V. Vernaeve, L. Van Landuyt, H. Tournaye, P. Devroey, and A. Van Steirteghem
Should diagnostic testicular sperm retrieval followed by cryopreservation for later ICSI be the procedure of choice for all patients with non-obstructive azoospermia?
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2004; 19(12): 2822 - 2830.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.