Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (55)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anthony, S.
Right arrow Articles by den Ouden, A.L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Anthony, S.
Right arrow Articles by den Ouden, A.L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 17, No. 8, 2089-2095, August 2002
© 2002 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Congenital malformations in 4224 children conceived after IVF

S. Anthony1,3, S.E. Buitendijk1, C.A. Dorrepaal1, K. Lindner1, D.D.M. Braat2 and A.L. den Ouden1

1 TNO Prevention and Health, Department of Reproduction and Perinatology, P.O.Box 2215, 2301 CE Leiden and 2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital St Radboud, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

BACKGROUND: The percentage of children born after IVF will continue to increase due to demographic changes such as increasing maternal age and new developments in assisted reproduction techniques. IVF conceptions may carry an increased risk of congenital malformations. METHODS: We compared overall and specific congenital malformation rates calculated for IVF children (n = 4224) and naturally conceived children (n = 314 605), using records from the same Dutch national database for the years 1995 and 1996 and controlling for confounding maternal factors. RESULTS: The overall crude odds ratio (OR) for the risk of any malformation for IVF children compared with naturally conceived children was 1.20 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01–1.43]. After correction for differences in maternal age, parity and ethnicity between the IVF and control population the OR was 1.03 (95% CI: 0.86–1.23). The crude OR for IVF children appeared higher for the cardiovascular organ system and for several specific minor congenital malformations. However, these could be chance findings due to comparison of many malformation categories or may result from remaining differences in ascertaining malformations between IVF and naturally conceived children. CONCLUSIONS: The small increase in overall congenital malformations observed in the IVF children appears to be attributable to differences in maternal characteristics and not to any aspect of the IVF procedure.

Key words: congenital malformations/IVF children/national registry/Netherlands

3 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail:s.anthony{at}pg.tno.nl


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
IOVSHome page
R. Axer-Siegel, Z. Herscovici, S. Davidson, N. Linder, I. Sherf, and M. Snir
Early Structural Status of the Eyes of Healthy Term Neonates Conceived by In Vitro Fertilization or Conceived Naturally
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., December 1, 2007; 48(12): 5454 - 5458.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
G. Giritharan, S. Talbi, A. Donjacour, F. Di Sebastiano, A. T Dobson, and P. F Rinaudo
Effect of in vitro fertilization on gene expression and development of mouse preimplantation embryos
Reproduction, July 1, 2007; 134(1): 63 - 72.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
U. M. Reddy, R. J. Wapner, R. W. Rebar, and R. J. Tasca
Infertility, Assisted Reproductive Technology, and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: Executive Summary of a National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Workshop
Obstet. Gynecol., April 1, 2007; 109(4): 967 - 977.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
P. Poikkeus, M. Gissler, L. Unkila-Kallio, C. Hyden-Granskog, and A. Tiitinen
Obstetric and neonatal outcome after single embryo transfer
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2007; 22(4): 1073 - 1079.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
U.-B. Wennerholm, M. Bonduelle, A. Sutcliffe, C. Bergh, A. Niklasson, B. Tarlatzis, C. M. Kai, C. Peters, A. V. Cederqvist, and A. Loft
Paternal sperm concentration and growth and cognitive development in children born with a gestational age more than 32 weeks after assisted reproductive therapy
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2006; 21(6): 1514 - 1520.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
B. J. Van Voorhis
Outcomes From Assisted Reproductive Technology
Obstet. Gynecol., January 1, 2006; 107(1): 183 - 200.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
R. Axer-Siegel, D. Bourla, L. Sirota, D. Weinberger, and M. Snir
Ocular Growth in Premature Infants Conceived by In Vitro Fertilization versus Natural Conception
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., April 1, 2005; 46(4): 1163 - 1169.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
J. M.R. Gerris
Single embryo transfer and IVF/ICSI outcome: a balanced appraisal
Hum. Reprod. Update, March 1, 2005; 11(2): 105 - 121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Hansen, C. Bower, E. Milne, N. de Klerk, and J. J.Kurinczuk
Assisted reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects--a systematic review
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2005; 20(2): 328 - 338.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. Bergh
Single embryo transfer: a mini-review
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2005; 20(2): 323 - 327.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Bonduelle, U.-B. Wennerholm, A. Loft, B.C. Tarlatzis, C. Peters, S. Henriet, C. Mau, A. Victorin-Cederquist, A. Van Steirteghem, A. Balaska, et al.
A multi-centre cohort study of the physical health of 5-year-old children conceived after intracytoplasmic sperm injection, in vitro fertilization and natural conception
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2005; 20(2): 413 - 419.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
G.M. Buck Louis, E.F. Schisterman, V.M. Dukic, and L.A. Schieve
Research hurdles complicating the analysis of infertility treatment and child health
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2005; 20(1): 12 - 18.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J.D. Biggers and M.C. Summers
When to avoid creating surplus human embryos
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2004; 19(11): 2457 - 2459.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
N. S. Green
Risks of Birth Defects and Other Adverse Outcomes Associated With Assisted Reproductive Technology
Pediatrics, July 1, 2004; 114(1): 256 - 259.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
L. A. Schieve, S. A. Rasmussen, G. M. Buck, D. E. Schendel, M. A. Reynolds, and V. C. Wright
Are Children Born After Assisted Reproductive Technology at Increased Risk for Adverse Health Outcomes?
Obstet. Gynecol., June 1, 2004; 103(6): 1154 - 1163.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
R. D. Lambert
Safety issues in assisted reproductive technology: Aetiology of health problems in singleton ART babies
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2003; 18(10): 1987 - 1991.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Sinawat, W.-C. Hsaio, J. H. Flockhart, M. H. Kaufman, J. Keith, and J. D. West
Fetal abnormalities produced after preimplantation exposure of mouse embryos to ammonium chloride
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2003; 18(10): 2157 - 2165.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
Minerva
BMJ, August 31, 2002; 325(7362): 502 - 502.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.