Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (51)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pellestor, F.
Right arrow Articles by Demaille, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pellestor, F.
Right arrow Articles by Demaille, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 17, No. 8, 2134-2145, August 2002
© 2002 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Mechanisms of non-disjunction in human female meiosis: the co-existence of two modes of malsegregation evidenced by the karyotyping of 1397 in-vitro unfertilized oocytes

Franck Pellestor1,3, Brigitte Andréo1, Françioise Arnal2, Claude Humeau2 and Jacques Demaille1

1 CNRS-UPR 1142, F-34396 Montpellier and 2 IVF Laboratory, C.H.U. Arnaud de Villeneuve, F-34033 Montpellier, France

BACKGROUND: Although numerous studies have been published on the chromosomal constitution of in-vitro unfertilized human oocytes, data remain highly variable and controversial because of the size of oocyte samples, technical reservations and potential misinterpretation. METHODS: A cytogenetic study was undertaken on 3042 unfertilized human oocytes recovered from 792 women participating in an IVF programme for various infertility problems. Both a gradual fixation technique and an R-banding procedure were used. RESULTS: The analysis was successful in 1397 oocytes (45.9%) for which interpretable metaphases were obtained. Of the 1397 oocyte karyotypes, 1088 (77.9%) were normal (23,X). The overall frequency of chromosomal abnormality was 22.1%. No correlation was found between the rate of abnormalities and the type of infertility. Aneuploidy was observed in 151 cells (10.8%), consisting of 5.4% hypohaploidies, 4.1% hyperhaploidies, 0.8% complex aneuploidies and 0.05% extreme aneuploidies with less than 18 chromosomes. Both whole chromosome non-disjunction and chromatid predivision contributed to the formation of aneuploid oocytes, but the numerical abnormalities due to single chromatids significantly exceeded conventional non-disjunctions. Abnormalities also included 5.4% diploid oocytes, 3.8% sets of chromatids alone and 2.1% structural aberrations. Aneuploidy was found in all chromosome groups. However, groups E and G exhibited significantly higher frequencies of non-disjunction than expected, whereas groups A and B showed a significantly low incidence of aneuploidy. CONCLUSIONS: The implication of both chromosome and chromatid abnormalities in the occurrence of non-disjunction are discussed in relation to the recent data on chromatid cohesion throughout cell division. The results were consistent with the hypothesis of an unequal occurrence of non-disjunction among the chromosome groups in female meiosis.

Key words: aneuploidy/chromatid predivision/human oocyte/karyotype/non-disjunction

3 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: CNRS-UPR 1142, IGH, 141, rue de la Cardonille, F-34396 Montpellier cedex 5, France. E-mail: Franck.Pellestor{at}igh.cnrs.fr


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Cukurcam, I. Betzendahl, G. Michel, E. Vogt, C. Hegele-Hartung, B. Lindenthal, and U. Eichenlaub-Ritter
Influence of follicular fluid meiosis-activating sterol on aneuploidy rate and precocious chromatid segregation in aged mouse oocytes
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2007; 22(3): 815 - 828.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
B. Rosenbusch
The contradictory information on the distribution of non-disjunction and pre-division in female gametes
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2006; 21(11): 2739 - 2742.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
F. Vialard, C. Petit, M. Bergere, D. M. Gomes, V. Martel-Petit, R. Lombroso, Y. Ville, H. Gerard, and J. Selva
Evidence of a high proportion of premature unbalanced separation of sister chromatids in the first polar bodies of women of advanced age
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2006; 21(5): 1172 - 1178.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Delimitreva, R. Zhivkova, E. Isachenko, N. Umland, and P.L. Nayudu
Meiotic abnormalities in in vitro-matured marmoset monkey (Callithrix jacchus) oocytes: development of a non-human primate model to investigate causal factors
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2006; 21(1): 240 - 247.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. Gutierrez-Mateo, J. Benet, H. Starke, M. Oliver-Bonet, S. Munne, T. Liehr, and J. Navarro
Karyotyping of human oocytes by cenM-FISH, a new 24-colour centromere-specific technique
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2005; 20(12): 3395 - 3401.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
N. M. Steuerwald, M. D. Steuerwald, and J. B. Mailhes
Post-ovulatory aging of mouse oocytes leads to decreased MAD2 transcripts and increased frequencies of premature centromere separation and anaphase
Mol. Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2005; 11(9): 623 - 630.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Pinton, T. Faraut, M. Yerle, J. Gruand, F. Pellestor, and A. Ducos
Comparison of male and female meiotic segregation patterns in translocation heterozygotes: a case study in an animal model (Sus scrofa domestica L.)
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2005; 20(9): 2476 - 2482.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
F. Pellestor, T. Anahory, and S. Hamamah
The chromosomal analysis of human oocytes. An overview of established procedures
Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2005; 11(1): 15 - 32.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. Gutierrez-Mateo, J. Benet, D. Wells, P. Colls, M.G. Bermudez, J.F. Sanchez-Garcia, J. Egozcue, J. Navarro, and S. Munne
Aneuploidy study of human oocytes first polar body comparative genomic hybridization and metaphase II fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2004; 19(12): 2859 - 2868.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
A. Kuliev and Y. Verlinsky
Meiotic and mitotic nondisjunction: lessons from preimplantation genetic diagnosis
Hum. Reprod. Update, September 1, 2004; 10(5): 401 - 407.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
F. J. Los, D. Van Opstal, and C. van den Berg
The development of cytogenetically normal, abnormal and mosaic embryos: a theoretical model
Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2004; 10(1): 79 - 94.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
F. Sun, I. Betzendahl, Y. Shen, R. Cortvrindt, J. Smitz, and U. Eichenlaub-Ritter
Preantral follicle culture as a novel in vitro assay in reproductive toxicology testing in mammalian oocytes
Mutagenesis, January 1, 2004; 19(1): 13 - 25.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Ziebe, K. Lundin, A. Loft, C. Bergh, A. Nyboe Andersen, U. Selleskog, D. Nielsen, C. Grondahl, H. Kim, and J.-C. Arce
FISH analysis for chromosomes 13, 16, 18, 21, 22, X and Y in all blastomeres of IVF pre-embryos from 144 randomly selected donated human oocytes and impact on pre-embryo morphology
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2003; 18(12): 2575 - 2581.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
T. Anahory, B. Andreo, G. Regnier-Vigouroux, J.P. Soulie, M. Baudouin, J. Demaille, and F. Pellestor
Sequential multiple probe fluorescence in-situ hybridization analysis of human oocytes and polar bodies by combining centromeric labelling and whole chromosome painting
Mol. Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2003; 9(10): 577 - 585.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Cukurcam, C. Hegele-Hartung, and U. Eichenlaub-Ritter
Meiosis-activating sterol protects oocytes from precocious chromosome segregation
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2003; 18(9): 1908 - 1917.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.