Human Reproduction, Vol. 18, No. 10, 2082-2088,
October 2003
© 2003 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
Biological variation of seminal parameters in healthy subjects
1 Unidad de Reproducción, Clínica Avicena, Jaén, 2 Unidad de Reproducción, Hospital Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, 3 CEIFER, Granada and 4 Departamento de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Jaén, Jaén, Spain
5 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Unidad de Reproducción, Hospital Virgen de las Nieves, E-18014, Granada, Spain. e-mail: josea.castilla.sspa{at}juntadeandalucia.es
BACKGROUND: A study was undertaken to assess the components of biological variation of seminal parameters in healthy subjects. METHODS: Twenty donor candidates were included in a 10-week follow-up study. Within- and between-subject biological variation, indices of individuality and heterogeneity, coefficient of reliability, critical differences, analytical goals and the lowest value observed with a <5% probability of having a true value less than the World Health Organization (1999) reference value were estimated for the following seminal parameters: concentration, total motility (WHO grades a + b + c), progressive motility (grades a + b), rapid progressive motility (grade a), sperm morphology and vitality. All analysis was performed by a single technician according to WHO 1999 guidelines for routine semen analysis. Analytical variation was assessed on different types of quality control material (frozen straws, sperm suspension, videotape, and slides) and at different (low, medium, high) quality levels. RESULTS: The analytical variation observed depended on the quality control material used and the level of semen quality. Concentration was the semen parameter with highest within- and between-subject variation, and vitality the lowest. Indices of individuality were all <0.7, and coefficients of reliability were high (0.68–0.84). The critical difference for sequential values significant at P < 0.05 for vitality, progressive motility and morphology (34.4, 49.2 and 58.0% respectively) were lower than for concentration (77.8%). CONCLUSIONS: The study results showed that conventional reference values for seminal parameters have little diagnostic value because of their marked individuality, though seminal parameters can be useful for assessing differences in an individual’s serial results, in particular of progressive motility, morphology and vitality.
Key words: analytical goals/analytical variation/biological variation/semen
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. E M Lewis Is sperm evaluation useful in predicting human fertility? Reproduction, July 1, 2007; 134(1): 31 - 40. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 I.M. Agbaje, D.A. Rogers, C.M. McVicar, N. McClure, A.B. Atkinson, C. Mallidis, and S.E.M. Lewis Insulin dependant diabetes mellitus: implications for male reproductive function Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2007; 22(7): 1871 - 1877. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Erenpreiss, M. Bungum, M. Spano, S. Elzanaty, J. Orbidans, and A. Giwercman Intra-individual variation in sperm chromatin structure assay parameters in men from infertile couples: clinical implications Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2006; 21(8): 2061 - 2064. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Ye, G.-n. Huang, Y. Gao, and D. Y. Liu Relationship between human sperm-hyaluronan binding assay and fertilization rate in conventional in vitro fertilization Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2006; 21(6): 1545 - 1550. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J.A. Castilla, C. Alvarez, J. Aguilar, C. Gonzalez-Varea, M.C. Gonzalvo, and L. Martinez Influence of analytical and biological variation on the clinical interpretation of seminal parameters Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2006; 21(4): 847 - 851. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J.A. Castilla, J. Morancho-Zaragoza, J. Aguilar, R. Prats-Gimenez, M.C. Gonzalvo, E. Fernandez-Pardo, C. Alvarez, R. Calafell, and L. Martinez Quality specifications for seminal parameters based on the state of the art Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2005; 20(9): 2573 - 2578. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. van Leeuwen, J.M. van Weert, F. van der Veen, and S. Repping The effects of the human immunodeficiency virus on semen parameters and intrauterine insemination outcome Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2005; 20(7): 2033 - 2034. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Sergerie, G. Laforest, K. Boulanger, F. Bissonnette, and G. Bleau Longitudinal study of sperm DNA fragmentation as measured by terminal uridine nick end-labelling assay Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2005; 20(7): 1921 - 1927. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|