Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ena, G.
Right arrow Articles by Rozenberg, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ena, G.
Right arrow Articles by Rozenberg, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 18, No. 11, 2245-2248, November 2003
© 2003 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Issues to debate on the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) study. Prescription attitudes among Belgian gynaecologists after premature discontinuation of the WHI study

Graziella Ena and Serge Rozenberg1

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St Peter University Hospital, Free University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Department Obstetrics and Gynecology, St Peter University Hospital, Free University of Brussels, Rue Haute, 322, 1000 Brussels, Belgium. e-mail: serge.rozenberg@skynet.be

BACKGROUND: A survey was conducted in order to assess the attitude of Belgian practitioners toward HRT, after publication of the results of the ‘Women’s Health Initiative’ (WHI) study. METHODS: Using a single case of a 55-year-old woman (no particular medical history, no longer climacteric symptoms), eight clinical case records were constructed by modifying three variables: (i) the HRT type [either conjugated estrogens (CEE) 0.625 mg + medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) or tibolone 2.5 mg]; (ii) the HRT duration (2 years or 11 years); and (iii) the bone density result (T-score +0.5 or –1.5). One case (drawn at random) was sent to Belgian gynaecologists (n = 1374), who were asked whether they would pursue, discontinue or modify the HRT regimen. RESULTS: In total, 577 returns were obtained (42% response rate). Globally, 19.8% of the physicians would stop prescribing the CEE+MPA regimen, 19.5% would continue the same regimen, and 60.7% would prescribe another HRT type, while respectively 15.9% of them would discontinue tibolone, 76.1% would continue it and 8% would prescribe another regimen (P < 0.001). After 2 years of use, 11.7% would discontinue HRT, while 23.5% would do so after 11 years (P < 0.001). No differences in prescription rates or discontinuation rates were observed in relation to the bone density results. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this survey suggested that Belgian gynaecologists intend to continue prescribing HRT, despite the negative findings of the WHI study. When patients are using tibolone, physicians generally maintain the same regimen, but when using CEE+MPA physicians tend to prescribe another HRT regimen. Less than 25% of physicians will spontaneously discontinue HRT, even after 11 years of use.

Key words: breast cancer/HRT/questionnaire/WHI study


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Rozenberg, B. Pornel, P. R. Koninckx, S. Palacios, and C. Christiansen
Endometrium protection and acceptability of nasally administered continuously combined hormone therapy: a multicentre, multinational, double-blind trial in post-menopausal women evaluating three regimens of 17{beta}-estradiol and norethisterone when compared with an orally administered 17{beta}-estradiol norethisterone regimen
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2009; 24(7): 1739 - 1747.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.