Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Derhaag, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Dumoulin, J. C.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Derhaag, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Dumoulin, J. C.M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 18, No. 12, 2565-2574, December 2003
© 2003 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Chromosomally abnormal cells are not selected for the extra-embryonic compartment of the human preimplantation embryo at the blastocyst stage

Josien G. Derhaag1,2,4, Edith Coonen1,2, Marijke Bras1,2, J.Marij Bergers Janssen1,2, Rosie Ignoul-Vanvuchelen1,2, Joep P.M. Geraedts1,3, Johannes L.H. Evers1,2 and John C.M. Dumoulin1,2

1 Research Institute Growth and Development (GROW), Maastricht University, 2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Maastricht and 3 Department of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands

4 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: IVF Laboratory, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Academic Hospital Maastricht, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands. e-mail: jderh{at}ms-azm-3.azm.nl

BACKGROUND: Although well defined for embryos at cleavage stages, the occurrence and frequency of chromosomal aberrations in human blastocysts is relatively unknown. It has been reported that only one in four blastocysts is comprised totally of chromosomally normal cells. One of the selection mechanisms for the embryo proper to become free of these chromosomally abnormal cells would be to sequester them to the extra-embryonic compartment during development. The study aim was to investigate whether such a mechanism of selection exists in human preimplantation embryos. METHODS: Inner cell mass (ICM)/trophectoderm (TE) differentiation was performed, followed by fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH), to study the chromosomal distribution in both populations of cells. RESULTS: Of the 94 successfully analysed blastocysts, 68.8 ± 1.5% of all analysable nuclei per blastocyst showed a disomic chromosomal content. Only 22.6% of blastocysts analysed were classified as normal. Of the embryos classified as abnormal at the blastocyst stage, 11.9% showed a simple mosaic pattern and 32.1% a complex mosaic pattern. An equally large group of blastocysts showed either a chaotic pattern (16.7%), or the chromosomal pattern could not be classified. The average degree of normal cells in the ICM (67.9%) was similar to the degree observed in the TE (69.5%). CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that chromosomally abnormal cells are not preferentially segregating to the extra-embryonic compartment of the human preimplantation embryo at the blastocyst stage. Hence, other mechanisms should be responsible for an absence of chromosomally abnormal cells in the embryo proper at later stages of development. One possible mechanism might be the elimination of the chromosomally abnormal cells by selective cell death activation.

Key words: chromosomal mosaicism/fluorescence in-situ hybridization/human blastocyst/inner cell mass/trophectoderm


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
P. Donoso, C. Staessen, B.C.J.M. Fauser, and P. Devroey
Current value of preimplantation genetic aneuploidy screening in IVF
Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2007; 13(1): 15 - 25.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
K. Chatzimeletiou, E. E. Morrison, N. Prapas, Y. Prapas, and A. H. Handyside
Spindle abnormalities in normally developing and arrested human preimplantation embryos in vitro identified by confocal laser scanning microscopy
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2005; 20(3): 672 - 682.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. C.M. Dumoulin, J. G. Derhaag, M. Bras, A. P.A. Van Montfoort, A. D.M. Kester, J. L.H. Evers, J. P.M. Geraedts, and E. Coonen
Growth rate of human preimplantation embryos is sex dependent after ICSI but not after IVF
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2005; 20(2): 484 - 491.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.