Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Freundl, G.
Right arrow Articles by Gnoth, Ch.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Freundl, G.
Right arrow Articles by Gnoth, Ch.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 18, No. 12, 2628-2633, December 2003
© 2003 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Estimated maximum failure rates of cycle monitors using daily conception probabilities in the menstrual cycle

G. Freundl1,5, E. Godehardt2, P.A. Kern1, P. Frank-Herrmann3, H.J. Koubenec4 and Ch. Gnoth1

1 Department of Reproductive Medicine and Gynaecological Endocrinology, Staedtische Kliniken Duesseldorf gGmbH, Frauenklinik Benrath and Institute of Natural Family Planning, 2 Biometric Research Group, Clinic for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery and 3 Department of Gynaecological Endocrinology, University of Heidelberg and 4 Stiftung Warentest, Berlin, Germany

5 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Frauenklinik Städt. Krankenhaus Düsseldorf-Benrath, Urdenbacher Allee 83, 40593 Düsseldorf, Germany. e-mail: freundlg{at}uni-duesseldorf.de

BACKGROUND: A number of menstrual cycle monitors have been developed to detect the fertile window of the menstrual cycle, mainly for contraceptive purposes. Reliable data on most of these systems are still missing but are urgently needed because many women use them and the tested systems differ enormously in price and effectiveness. We suggest a new efficacy estimating method to evaluate cycle monitors prior to full prospective clinical trials. METHODS: Sixty-two women prospectively tested seven cycle monitors and the symptothermal method (STM) of natural family planning (NFP) but not more than two different systems at the same time. The clinical fertile window was determined by detecting the day of ovulation using daily urinary LH measurements and daily ultrasonic folliculometry. This was compared to the fertile phase predicted by the systems. Maximum failure rates were estimated for each cycle monitor and the STM, using the daily conception probability rates taken from the European Fecundability Study. Intercourse was assumed to occur on each of all falsely predicted days of infertility. RESULTS: Sixty-two women with a mean age of 31 years (range: 21–42 years) contributed a total of 122 cycles to this study. Monitors based on the microscopic evaluation of saliva or mucus had many more false infertile days than the other methods based on temperature or hormonal measurements (225 versus 42 days). The maximum unintended pregnancy rates per cycle for temperature computers were estimated to be 0.0134–0.0336, for the hormonal computer 0.1155 and for mini-microscopes 0.2313–0.2369. For the STM of NFP, there were no false infertile days. CONCLUSIONS: The STM of NFP proved to be the most effective contraceptive method to detect the fertile window among all the methods tested. The estimated efficacy of the other cycle monitors range from the temperature computers (upper level) to the hormonal computer (medium level) and the mini-microscopes with very low estimated contraceptive efficacy.

Key words: cycle monitor/hormonal computer/mini-microscopes/natural family planning/temperature computers


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
K. L. Scolaro, K. B. Lloyd, and K. L. Helms
Devices for home evaluation of women's health concerns
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., February 15, 2008; 65(4): 299 - 314.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
P. Frank-Herrmann, J. Heil, C. Gnoth, E. Toledo, S. Baur, C. Pyper, E. Jenetzky, T. Strowitzki, and G. Freundl
The effectiveness of a fertility awareness based method to avoid pregnancy in relation to a couple's sexual behaviour during the fertile time: a prospective longitudinal study
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2007; 22(5): 1310 - 1319.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.