Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (49)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bonduelle, M.
Right arrow Articles by Liebaers, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bonduelle, M.
Right arrow Articles by Liebaers, I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 18, No. 2, 342-350, February 2003
© 2003 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Developmental outcome at 2 years of age for children born after ICSI compared with children born after IVF

M. Bonduelle1,5, I. Ponjaert2, A.Van Steirteghem3, M.-P. Derde4, P. Devroey3 and I. Liebaers1

1 Centre for Medical Genetics, 2 Department of Developmental Psychology, 3 Centre for Reproductive Medicine and 4 Centre for Biostatistics, Dutch-speaking Brussels Free University, Brussels, Belgium

5 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Medische Genetica, AZ-VUB, Laarbeeklaan 101, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium. e-mail: maryse.bonduelle{at}az.vub.ac.be

BACKGROUND: Since the introduction of ICSI in 1991, medical outcome studies on ICSI children have been performed, but few have addressed developmental outcome. Hence, this outcome was assessed by performing a standard developmental test on children born after ICSI as compared with children born after IVF, at the age of 2 years. METHODS: In a prospective study, the medical and developmental outcome of 439 children born after ICSI (378 singletons, 61 twins) were compared with those of 207 children born after IVF (138 singletons, 69 twins), at the age of 24–28 months. These children were part of a cohort of children followed since birth. Of children reaching the age of 24–28 months between May 1995 and March 2002, 44.3% (2375/5356) were examined by a paediatrician who was unaware of the type of treatment used for each couple. Of all the children born, 12.2% (439/3618) in the ICSI group and 11.9% (207/1738) in the IVF group underwent a formal developmental assessment using the Bayley Scale of Infant Development (mental scale) by a paediatrician blinded to the type of treatment. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in maternal educational level, maternal age, gestational age, parity, birthweight, neonatal complication rate or malformation rate at 2 years between ICSI and IVF singletons, or between ICSI and IVF twins. No significant difference was observed in the developmental outcome using the Bayley scale at the age of 24–28 months (raw scores or test age) between ICSI children or IVF children. A multivariate regression analysis for the singleton children indicated that parity, sex (boys had lower scores than girls) and age had a significant influence on the test result, but that the fertility procedure (ICSI versus IVF) did not influence the test result. ICSI children from fathers with low sperm concentration, low sperm motility or poor morphology had a similar developmental outcome to that of children from fathers with normal sperm parameters. There were no significant differences between the initial cohort and the group lost to follow-up, nor between the psychologically tested and the non-tested group for a number of variables such as maternal educational level, birthweight in singletons and neonatal malformation rate. Although only some of the cohort of ICSI children were evaluated, a representative sample of both ICSI and IVF children was compared. CONCLUSIONS: There is no indication that ICSI children have a lower psychomotor development than IVF children. Paternal risk factors associated with male-factor infertility were found not to play a role in developmental outcome.

Keywords: children/development/ICSI/IVF/male and female infertility


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Pediatr PsycholHome page
L. Goldbeck, F. Gagsteiger, I. Mindermann, S. Strobele, and Y. Izat
Cognitive Development of Singletons Conceived by Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection or In vitro Fertilization at Age 5 and 10 years
J. Pediatr. Psychol., August 1, 2009; 34(7): 774 - 781.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. Nekkebroeck, M. Bonduelle, S. Desmyttere, W. Van den Broeck, and I. Ponjaert-Kristoffersen
Mental and psychomotor development of 2-year-old children born after preimplantation genetic diagnosis/screening
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2008; 23(7): 1560 - 1566.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Golombok, F. Olivennes, C. Ramogida, J. Rust, T. Freeman, and The Follow-Up Team
Parenting and the psychological development of a representative sample of triplets conceived by assisted reproduction
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2007; 22(11): 2896 - 2902.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
F. Belva, S. Henriet, I. Liebaers, A. Van Steirteghem, S. Celestin-Westreich, and M. Bonduelle
Medical outcome of 8-year-old singleton ICSI children (born >=32 weeks' gestation) and a spontaneously conceived comparison group
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2007; 22(2): 506 - 515.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
L. Leunens, S. Celestin-Westreich, M. Bonduelle, I. Liebaers, and I. Ponjaert-Kristoffersen
Cognitive and motor development of 8-year-old children born after ICSI compared to spontaneously conceived children
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2006; 21(11): 2922 - 2929.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
V. Soderstrom-Anttila, T. Salokorpi, M. Pihlaja, S. Serenius-Sirve, and A.-M. Suikkari
Obstetric and perinatal outcome and preliminary results of development of children born after in vitro maturation of oocytes
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2006; 21(6): 1508 - 1513.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
U.-B. Wennerholm, M. Bonduelle, A. Sutcliffe, C. Bergh, A. Niklasson, B. Tarlatzis, C. M. Kai, C. Peters, A. V. Cederqvist, and A. Loft
Paternal sperm concentration and growth and cognitive development in children born with a gestational age more than 32 weeks after assisted reproductive therapy
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2006; 21(6): 1514 - 1520.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
A. Pinborg
IVF/ICSI twin pregnancies: risks and prevention
Hum. Reprod. Update, November 1, 2005; 11(6): 575 - 593.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J.-L. Hwang, K.-M. Seow, Y.-H. Lin, B.-C. Hsieh, L.-W. Huang, H.-J. Chen, S.-C. Huang, C.-Y. Chen, P.-H. Chen, and C.-R. Tzeng
IVF versus ICSI in sibling oocytes from patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome: a randomized controlled trial
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2005; 20(5): 1261 - 1265.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Le Du, I.J. Kadoch, N. Bourcigaux, S. Doumerc, M-C. Bourrier, N. Chevalier, R. Fanchin, R-C. Chian, G. Tachdjian, R. Frydman, et al.
In vitro oocyte maturation for the treatment of infertility associated with polycystic ovarian syndrome: the French experience
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2005; 20(2): 420 - 424.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. C.M. Dumoulin, J. G. Derhaag, M. Bras, A. P.A. Van Montfoort, A. D.M. Kester, J. L.H. Evers, J. P.M. Geraedts, and E. Coonen
Growth rate of human preimplantation embryos is sex dependent after ICSI but not after IVF
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2005; 20(2): 484 - 491.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
J. Gianotten, M.P. Lombardi, A.H. Zwinderman, R. J. Lilford, and F. van der Veen
Idiopathic impaired spermatogenesis: genetic epidemiology is unlikely to provide a short-cut to better understanding
Hum. Reprod. Update, November 1, 2004; 10(6): 533 - 539.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. Celik-Ozenci, A. Jakab, T. Kovacs, J. Catalanotti, R. Demir, P. Bray-Ward, D. Ward, and G. Huszar
Sperm selection for ICSI: shape properties do notpredict the absence or presence of numericalchromosomal aberrations
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2004; 19(9): 2052 - 2059.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
N. S. Green
Risks of Birth Defects and Other Adverse Outcomes Associated With Assisted Reproductive Technology
Pediatrics, July 1, 2004; 114(1): 256 - 259.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
Z. Papaligoura, O. Panopoulou-Maratou, M. Solman, K. Arvaniti, and J. Sarafidou
Cognitive development of 12 month old Greek infants conceived after ICSI and the effects of the method on their parents
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2004; 19(6): 1488 - 1493.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Bungum, P. Humaidan, M. Spano, K. Jepson, L. Bungum, and A. Giwercman
The predictive value of sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA) parameters for the outcome of intrauterine insemination, IVF and ICSI
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2004; 19(6): 1401 - 1408.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
L. Gandini, F. Lombardo, D. Paoli, F. Caruso, P. Eleuteri, G. Leter, R. Ciriminna, F. Culasso, F. Dondero, A. Lenzi, et al.
Full-term pregnancies achieved with ICSI despite high levels of sperm chromatin damage
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2004; 19(6): 1409 - 1417.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
P. Devroey and A. Van Steirteghem
A review of ten years experience of ICSI
Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2004; 10(1): 19 - 28.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.