Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Audibert, F.
Right arrow Articles by Frydman, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Audibert, F.
Right arrow Articles by Frydman, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 18, No. 2, 437-440, February 2003
© 2003 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Embryo reduction and birth weight discordance in dichorionic twins

François Audibert1, Marine Boullier, Claire Boithias, Violaine Kerbrat, Michèle Vial and René Frydman

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris, Université Paris XI, 92140 Clamart, France

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. e-mail: francois.audibert{at}abc.ap-hop-paris.fr

BACKGROUND: Twin birth weight discordance is associated with a poor perinatal outcome. The aim of this study was to analyse the risk factors of growth discordance among dichorionic twin pregnancies. METHODS: A cohort of 346 dichorionic twin pregnancies delivered at one perinatal centre between January 1996 and December 1999 was analysed. Two groups were created, according to the presence or absence of intra-pair birth weight discordance (n = 75 and 271 respectively). Birth weight discordance was defined as a difference of >=20% of the weight of the heavier twin. The two groups were compared by uni- and multivariate analysis, with regard to the woman's characteristics, risk factors for growth restriction or discordance, and outcome of pregnancy. RESULTS: Pregnancies with birth weight discordance had a poor outcome compared with pregnancies without discordance, with a 4-fold increase in neonatal mortality. The rate of iatrogenic embryo reduction was significantly higher in discordant pregnancies (14.7 versus 6.6%, P = 0.03). The risk of birth weight discordance was increased with a larger starting number of embryos before reduction [20.2% (64/317), 28.6% (6/21), 57.1% (4/7) and 100% (1/1) respectively, for an initial number of two (no reduction), three, four, and five embryos, P = 0.02]. In multivariate analysis, embryo reduction was the only significant risk factor for the occurrence of birth weight discordance [adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 2.3 (1.0–5.2)]. CONCLUSIONS: Birth weight discordance carries a poor perinatal outcome. Embryo reduction is an independent risk factor for birth weight discordance in dichorionic twins. This finding emphasises the need for better control of assisted reproductive technology in order to avoid high-order multiple pregnancies.

Key words: birth weight discordance/embryo reduction/growth restriction/twin birth


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.