Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sharif, K.
Right arrow Articles by Afnan, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sharif, K.
Right arrow Articles by Afnan, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 18, No. 3, 483-485, March 2003
© 2003 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

The IVF league tables: time for a reality check

Khaldoun Sharif1 and Masoud Afnan

Assisted Conception Unit, Birmingham Women’s Hospital, Birmingham B15 2TG, UK

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. e-mail: khaldoun.sharif@bham-womens.thenhs.com

In many countries the reported results of the different IVF clinics are published nationally by the relevant regulatory bodies, such as the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority in the UK. The published format suggests that clinics are being compared on a valid basis, and the involvement of the regulatory bodies apparently gives this comparison the official seal of authenticity. However, clinics can control many factors in patient selection, management and reporting, and these can inflate the reported results. Consequently, patients, instead of being appropriately guided, can be misled by these so-called ‘IVF league tables’. The IVF community, including users, providers and regulatory bodies, need to recognize these factors and to develop a way forward for comparing clinics results on an equal and a valid basis. In this paper we discuss the factors that could affect the reported IVF results, and suggest possible options for valid comparison.

Key words: IVF/league tables/results


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
J. A. Castilla, J. Hernandez, Y. Cabello, A. Lafuente, N. Pajuelo, J. Marqueta, B. Coroleu, and (Assisted Reproductive Technology Register of the
Defining poor and optimum performance in an IVF programme
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2008; 23(1): 85 - 90.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
H. Abdalla and M.Y. Thum
Repeated testing of basal FSH levels has no predictive value for IVF outcome in women with elevated basal FSH
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2006; 21(1): 171 - 174.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
H. Abdalla and M.Y. Thum
An elevated basal FSH reflects a quantitative rather than qualitative decline of the ovarian reserve
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2004; 19(4): 893 - 898.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.